Read the Pfizer one can make you sterile.
Not only that, but mRNA vaccines have an enormous list of other problems:
mRNA vaccines do create robust immune responses. The problem is, they cause an over reaction by the immune system much later on when a person is exposed to the real virus in the wild. In animal studies, it causes organ failure and death. This is one of the reasons mRNA vaccines have never been created successfully, despite being around for decades. And yet, with this vaccine, we're supposed to believe everything will be ok, despite those very same trials being both rushed, and skipped altogether:
https://twitter.com/i/status/1335489612769157122
Even a former VP Pfizer talks about how terrible an idea it all is:
People with very compromised immune systems can definitely benefit from a (real) vaccine.
They can benefit from simple and proper nutritional supplementation (such as Vitamin D3 and Zinc) and food. Even just 5000 IUs of D3 per day prevents the need for a majority of hospitalizations.
If they still get sick, therapeutics like H202 nebulizers, budesonide, HCQ/Zn/Azythromyacin, and any other number of treatments are available to stop the disease (at least in the lungs). The first two I mentioned work with near 100% effectiveness, in any disease stage, with any patient, and with no side effects.
Agree with everything, except one thing: Vaccines have always been dangerous. Even the inventor of the Polio vaccine acknowledged that basically all polio cases in the US since 1961 were caused by the vaccines, and that's just one example.
vaccines have historically been well tested and they had a really good track record.
I would encourage you to watch this:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Bt2pVLJcx1ql/
Vaccines are far more dangerous than people think. Vaccine companies don't even have liability in the United States because they were getting sued so much for all the injuries and deaths they were causing that they made congress give them 100% liability in 1986. Since they got immunity, the number of vaccines has skyrocketed, from 3 being on the CDC schedule before 1989, to over 70 today. And along with the increase, all sorts of disabilities, allergies, and other problems have skyrocketed; things that were historically extremely rare.
Ron Coleman even retweeted to do this. The reality is, when a state allows their federal election to be stolen, it affects all the other states. In fact, those other states can sue the states that allowed the fraud. I just heard Jay Sekulow go over that (lawyer who's argued 12 cases before the Supreme Court).
Keep in mind, it's more productive for people to only focus on republicans for the time being. The RINOs might have a 50% chance of supporting a special session if they get enough of our calls. The dems... maybe only like 1%. I would edit your list to only have republicans, or at the very least, organize the repubs at the top and label them, and have the dems in the bottom.
Feel free to call Rep. Bowers and leave a voicemail letting him know how you feel about him shutting down everything and doing nothing to investigate fraud:
Rusty Bowers
(602) 926 3128 / [email protected]
From a post I made earlier:
🚨🚨 NEW IDEA: GET 1,000,000 SIGNATURES FOR RECALL ELECTION OF GOV BRIAN KEMP AND SEC OF STATE BRAD RAFFENSPERGER. HAVE THE PETITIONERS 150 FEET AWAY FROM THE GA POLLING PLACES DURING JANUARY 5TH RUNOFF. 3 BIRDS, 1 STONE: SCARE GOV & SEC INTO ACTION. GET TRUMP SUPPORTERS TO VOTE. REMOVE BOTH OF THEM 🚁
Georgia only needs 15% of voters to sign a petition to initiate a recall election for the Governor or the Secretary of State. So why not use this runoff election on January 5th as a way to also get signatures for a recall election? Do you really think there aren't 15% of Trump supporters who would love to see these two RINOs removed from office? Or even butthurt Stacey Abrams supporters? Kemp and Raffensperger have no supporters at all. Everybody hates them.
Them knowing this is going to happen will encourage Kemp to call for a special session of congress to investigate voter fraud, and might even encourage Raffensperger to do a proper signature/envelope audit and verification. The prospect of a potential recall election, which they stand a good chance of actually losing, should put some fire underneath their feet.
And if not, we'll remove both their asses out of office, without a single fuck being given. I don't care who replaces them. Fuck them both.
To be clear, these petitions will not remove them from office. They will initiate a recall election in which voters will get to decide in a few months whether to remove them or not.
More info (important):
-
Signature gatherers can't be within 150 feet of polling places on election day. They can be nearly any other public place (like grocery stores). Heck, we could even do it at a Trump rally.
-
No recall petition can have more than one person to be removed at a time (we'd need two petitions).
The provisions for a recall election are laid out in Title 21, Section 4 of the Georgia Code. The prescribed process is complex, lengthy, and difficult, by design. We must do the following:
-
Formally request a recall petition application from the Secretary of State, at which point we will have 15 days to collect the signatures of at least 100 “sponsors” for the application to move forward.
-
If that form is accepted, then we can begin circulating the recall petition, at which point we will have 90 days to collect the requisite number of signatures from across the state.
-
Once we’ve collected enough signatures on the petition, it will be submitted and the Secretary of State will have 30 days to determine if enough of the signatures are valid
-
After clearing the approval process, the Secretary of State will have 10 days to set a date for the recall election, which must be between 30-45 days after the petition is verified.
-
Then, we vote them out of office.
-
We would need signatures from approximately 1,035,000 people. Of those signatures, at least 1/15 of them (approximately 70,000) must come from each of Georgia’s fourteen congressional districts. The petition would not be ready to sign until the formal application had been submitted and found to be "legally sufficient" by elections officials and/or a judge. No online petitions could be used. The only way a legally recognized petition can be signed is in person, in the county where they live.
-
No person other than an elector of the electoral district of the officer sought to be recalled can circulate a recall petition.
-
If we fail to collect the needed number of signatures and there are no concurrent recall efforts, the Governor and Secretary of State would not be eligible for another recall for 6 months.
Note 1: There is a website out there called https://recallgovkemp.com/, but they appear to be democrat supporters. I would avoid trying to go through them, because they wouldn't want to do anything right now that could help Trump. So we would need to do this on our own. They do have a helpful FAQ section, though.
Note 2: The same Georgia recall law allows for removal of local elected officials too, with less stringent requirements (although note: "No application for a recall petition may be filed during the first 180 days or during the last 180 days of the term of office of any public official subject to recall").
Note 3: I am not a Georgia resident, so we need our Georgia pedes to help on this.
Full Georgia law code on this process. It's not that long, surprisingly:
https://law.justia.com/codes/georgia/2018/title-21/chapter-4/
They did much more than let it happen...
Post about how to do it:
https://thedonald.win/p/11QlPCkygb/-new-idea-get-1000000-signatures/c/
All that video is, is an official denying the vote count discrepancy was caused by the machines, but he does not actually say he knows what caused it. He just speculates that blaming the machines is preposterous. Of course, he may turn out to be correct, but he hardly offers anything conclusive.
Edit: Minor word change
When you show the suitcase video of ballot fraud at State Farm arena, be sure to use the composite version here:
https://youtube.com/watch?v=cbTSUkA8xgI
As a sidenote, there is so much voter fraud info out there, beyond just Georgia. The Pennsylvania USPS truck driver for example, or the Colonel Warden testimony he gave in multiple states (like for example in Pennsylvania, where he mentioned they had a period of ballots that were 570,000 for Biden, 3,200 for Trump).
I also recommend you watch some of the Richard Baris/Robert Barnes interviews.
If you want to better understand why the votes jumped when the machines turned back on then look into VWAP (Volume Weighted Avg Price) algorithms. I spent my career reverse engineering them to better understand market dynamics. In short, Financial Engineers created an Algorithm that treats each voter as a price entering the market and number of votes as volume. Contact me and I break it all down. I traded billions of shares (manually) over my career.I had no idea those insights would ever be relevant to voting systems.
I would encourage you to read this entire thread I had with another user. It's about 15 comments between the two of us.
Just because it would be dumb to do it a certain way doesn't mean you need to look for a different way
Well, usually if there is a major logical problem with something, and a much easier method available, then it is only logical to try to answer the problems. The only reason the other method would not have been used is because, A:), we either don't understand something, or, B:), the premise is flawed and never happened.
Not really sure what you're trying to achieve here
I'm trying to find the truth. If these questions can not be answered, then there is a serious problem in the hypothesis (ie, it didn't happen), or we do not have a complete hypothesis.
At any rate, if I can come up with these questions, you can be sure a defense team of 50 democrat lawyers can, too.
I don't either, but at the same time, most people replying to Soloman's videos, myself included, don't really understand what he's saying. The math is way over most people's heads.
I do, however, understand the questions I am asking, which are simple, and which have yet to be answered.
That's fine, but then that would mean that the fake ballots being added would not be being scanned. They would just be being added to backup what was already switched. They wouldn't need (or want) to actually scan them. The added ballots would only be being added to survive a potential recount later on.
The evidence thus far indicates that those fake ballots were, however, being scanned.
Furthermore, if the ballots were added but not scanned, then why wouldn't they just scan them the night of, and avoid switching anything digitally in the first place, which is way more risky?
Take 3000-5000 IUs of vitamin D3 every day. Take some omega 3s. Sardines are a great source of all these things, as well as vitamin E, and other vitamins and minerals.
These are some of the cheapest ways to be healthy and prevent covid-19 with no side effects.