I guess that's moreso where I'm going - some are suggesting they're just toss those ballots in the trash. I think it's more likely they'll have to try and audit all of the ballots counted during that time period. If they're not able to separate them, then I'm not sure what happens.
Is a re-vote possible?
It seems to me like the 'big play' in Pennsylvania will be the ballots counted while GOP observers were barred from entry and/or kept further than 6ft away. I have a ton of lingering questions:
- Will the SCOTUS side with us on that?
- It's obviously violates election law - so then what happens?
- I can't see them discarding the votes. Will they ask to audit all votes cast during that period? What if they're mixed in with the rest of them?
- Could we see a re-do of the vote in PA?
Here is the net change in image form.
Here is a calculation of the changes so people can see what flipped.
Also funny to note, Biden got all 54 new votes in this tally. If you calculate the difference between the two flipped values you get 52, but I believe that's a rounding error due to the imprecise percentages shown in the image.
As much as we like Tucker, and to a lesser extent Hannity and Ingraham, we have to turn them off as well. Fox needs to go down.
Tucker & co. are good enough to find success wherever they go. They should be leaving Fox and going elsewhere, and we should support them.
I made this myself. I took the data from the PA "2020 General Election Mail Ballot Requests" dataset and plotted it out. These are the ballots received either the same day, next day or BEFORE they were mailed out.
Philly sticks out like a sore thumb.
I'm in agreement with you, this isn't going to convince anyone.
I've been reading that all of the news orgs get their numbers from a system called "Clarity", and specifically those numbers go to AP and then agencies pull from them. The real question would be did "Clarity" switch the counts - I'm not sure who would or how we would confirm this.
Link to voter list: https://controlc.com/7c96196a
We have to stop propagating the 14k number - it's misleading and makes us look bad.
- There are indeed 14k registered voters in MI over the age of 100
- Of the 14k, only about 1300 appear to have voted
- Of the ~1300, it's unclear how many of them are still alive, this needs to be verified.
1300 of 93,927 is only 1.4%. This is reasonable. There is plenty of actual fraud to uncover and inform about, so let's not mix in misleading stuff which hurts our cause.
This might have been what Ted Cruz was alluding to yesterday, saying "Trump needs to have good lawyers on the ground filing these lawsuits" (I'm paraphrasing)