"I can't fathom risking our norms, traditions and institutions to pass a resolution retroactively changing the electors for Trump, simply because some think there may have been enough widespread fraud to give him the win," said Chatfield.
It's so fucked up. When the absentee ballot requirement was challenged months ago the court said "You haven't shown harm" and threw it out. Now, after the election when harm is shown they say "You didn't complain on time months ago when the change was made" You can't make this shit up. Banana Republic.
This is a better explanation. 1 Win 1 Loss in WI today. The win could still give the state to Trump if Republicans in legislature do the right thing and send Trump electors. The WI Supreme Court ruled that absentee ballots sent out illegally under the indefinite confinement clause by Gov, SoS and county clerks due to COVID alone. https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/12/one-two-wisconsin-supreme-court-rulings-give-president-trump-win-enough-votes-win-state/
Yeah, but didn't they refuse to grant relief (ie. throw out ballots) based on complaint being filed too late? (not expiditiously). https://thedonald.win/p/11R4XDNSHh/breaking-wi-supreme-court-rules-/c/
What is the final result of this? Does Trump win WI?
NO, this is potentially good. Remember, the states just sent electors today. The state election authorities have officially committed fraud. Will see if Rosen investigates.