Or don't, so you don't jack up the prices for no reason buying something you can't use in a few months and will end up having to turn in anyways.
Gun registration means:
Having unregistered guns is a crime, meaning you become a criminal overnight if you do not comply.
You have to register your gun or...
You can't transport your guns without risking being pulled over, searched, and taken to jail for having an unregistered gun.
You can't take your gun to a range to practice because if it is unregistered, the range will report you (they don't want to get in trouble and this loophole will be quickly closed when democrats realize they can mandate that ranges record serial numbers of guns used at their range).
You risk going to jail if you practice on private property because Karen might hear/see you and report you to the authorities.
You can't buy any new guns without registering them legally, meaning you are stuck with what you have or you pay massive black market prices and will likely get your dog shot when the ATF does a sting on you.
So, why not just register them? There are a lot of incentives to. But wait, what is the point of a gun registry? Just because they have a giant database of some/most of the guns doesn't stop criminals using them for criminal things, and it doesn't actually help with investigations or prosecutions of criminals. A big list of guns and their owners only helps if the criminal is using their own registered firearm and then leaves it at the scene of the crime, and even then, the police already have plenty of ways to tie the owner of a gun to that specific gun if it is found at the scene of the crime, or even to tie casings and bullets to a specific firearm. If the criminal takes the gun with them, the registry doesn't help, casings can later be tied to that gun and if it is found in your possession you are cooked anyways. If the gun is stolen, the registry doesn't help. The registry, therefore, is only really helpful for finding guns that have never been used for criminal activity. Why would the government want to do that?
Gun confiscation/bans/buybacks! A registry makes it easy to do one thing and one thing only, track down guns that have never been used for a crime and belong to a law abiding citizen who chose to comply and register their gun.
So what about a gun ban? Should you comply if they ban your AR15 and require you to destroy it or turn it in?
You cant be seen with it, you can't sell it, cant legally buy ammo for it, you can't upgrade it, you can't practice with it, if you use it for personal/home defense you will be prosecuted, if you use it for hunting you will be prosecuted... so on and so forth.
The gun registry has been drafted in the house. Bury your guns if you want, but you might as well be burying drug money you can't spend and will get you in a lot of trouble if someone finds it.
Best bet is probably to move to a free country that won't ban your guns. Oh wait, there are no more free countries.
I think they will make an attempt on biden's life and false flag it the shit out of it and blame trump supporters. Will be used to start persecuting us and do a gun grab and patriot act 2.0 to monitor and shut down free speech. This would be the most politically powerful move democrats could possibly make and would almost ensure that democrats have a permanent majority and individual freedoms are completely removed in one fel swoop. The incentive to do this, for the democrats, is massive. It lets them clean up literally every problem they have right now and secure power for the next 100 years or more AND prevent any possibility of a citizen uprising by grabbing all the guns. We will be China in no time flat, and there is no reason they would not want that to happen (let's be real, democrats have no problems with a little sacrifice for the greater good).
If that doesn't happen, he will probably "get sick" and step down.
The first is really bad for the aforementioned reasons. But also because then we end up with kamala. Biden is a walking corpse, a meat puppet for the globalist agenda. Kamala is scarier, she 100% wants to destroy the country and knows exactly how to do it. Biden has to be told what to do.
The second scenario is bad because we get Kamala but at least Trump supporters don't get false flagged.
Trump will never be president again. As great as he was, he failed to drain the swamp and do something about big tech, but he did expose the media to some people (others like to be brainwashed)
Its not uncommon for national guard to do this, at least I think. I saw this in a French Airport following a bomb threat declared all clear, soldiers walking around with unloaded FAMAS rifles, just to have a "presence" so everyone stays orderly while they wrap up whatever they are doing. I think when there is no immediate threat its common practice to keep rifles unloaded.
Thats that then.
Or maybe it's pArT oF tHe PlAn!!!
Got anymore of that hopium?
Either:
Trump is wasting everyone's time with dumb EOs, or...
Lin Woods claims of coercive blackmail are real, people are about to get arrested, and the EO is an attempt to layer on some precautions for the upcoming legal process.
No audio, not sure whats happening
For real? Thats awesome.
Need some 10% for the bug guy signs too.
To troll her. It was awesome.
Just because two groups fight with each other doesn't mean they aren't identical in every other fucking way.
Aftifa = nazis. They just disagree on who gets put in the mass graves.
WhItE sUpReMaCy!
But in all honesty this is beautiful.
Richard Spencer is mad that he wanted us to be our friend and we told him to fck off.
I find it shocking that anyone got tiktok to begin with
Yea you are right, it was Vitamin E acetate. Carry on then, puff away.
Isn't that the shit people were cutting the thc oil with that was killing kids with lipoid pneumonia, and the lying media was using these cases to push niccotine bans because they are pro-big tobacco and pro cancer?
More national guard?
Be careful with conspiracy theories. It is better to be skeptical of them and not treat lack of evidence against them as evidence for them.
There are some out there that in my opinion "warrant" thinking about.
There are some wierd questions about the Holocaust that need to be answered, and I am sure they could be easily but we are not allowed to ask them or we are Holocaust denying anti-semites (I am not, one of Trump's greatest moves was moving the embassy to Jerusalem and I have also supported Israel and been critical of the let's failure to properly understand how the Holocaust happened and how what they are doing leads to mass murder.)
The original moon landing does also have some questions that need to be answered. Pedogate as well. Some Q proofs are interesting, and it would be nice to know what Q is, how many people are involved and what their motivations are.
But when we start believing the really wild stuff that there is no basis for, lizard people, flat earth, ect. It can discredit the valid questions we have in the eyes of many who are inclined to accept mainstream narratives that they are told.
Its always worth asking questions, but the reality is we have to be careful about which ones we ask and when we ask them in this society. I think you will find that flat earth is a difficult theory to maintain as there is substantial evidence against it, and it will get you called crazy and friends and family will brush off any other ideas or theories you may have that may be less easy to disprove.
Yea stopped listening to him about a year ago.
He was fence sitting harder than beanie man and then seemed to go full libtard at some point. The fence sitting is honestly boring af so I just stopped watching and from the little I've seen since, I'm glad I did.
Deport this glowie/antifa
"wouldn’t a jet airliner also have to account for CE especially when landing on a runway that is not oriented perfectly east to west?"
Well, two answers. The first is that jet airliners do account for this in their navigation systems. Second is that jets are under constant variable acceleration. Jets can turn, accelerate, and decelerate during the entire flight, so compensation for the earths rotation can be distributed over the course of the flight. For ballistic flight, you must compensate by adjusting the windage an elevation of the barrel, after the projectile is in flight, no further adjustments can be made. For long range shots, the coreolis effect will "appear" to be a significant adjustment to your aim, whereas many smaller adjustments over the course of a flight may not even be noticeable to a pilot. The coreolis effect was first discovered in WWI when artillery batteries tried to bombard cities at great distances, and found their real point of impact to be considerably off from the calculated point of impact until the rotation of the earth was factored in.
"Moon landing"
The fake moon landing theory is more credible than flat earth, there are some eyebrow raising features of that theory. However, I do not believe it was faked. You completely lose me when we start assuming every single other satellite ever sent up is also faked, when my career and focus of study involves GPS and satellites that definitely do exist. See survey coordinates below.
"Survey coordinates - I have no idea."
I work with GIS systems and can tell you definitively that flat local grids don't work more any considerable distance from the intersect point of the flat grid and the earths sphere, and it is a massive pain in the ass trying to make them work when clients require that we use them. However, spherical coordinates do work. You can convert readily between coordinate systems with little to no loss of accuracy when you stick inside spherical coordinates, and this can be seen in real world applications such as using those coordinates for surveying. Modern survey grade GIS/GPS systems are centimeter accurate. I can locate a pebble in the real world reliably within 1 centimeter and plot it on a map every time, provided there are no multiparty issues with the GPS (which is explained pretty readily if you assume that everyone is NOT lying and the GPS receives its signals from real sattelites.)
"Sun and moon"
The sun and moon are round because they are spheres, which is the natural shape for a large body to take once that body is large enough for its own gravity to become the dominant force acting on it. If the sun and moon were cylindrical, they would defy all our current laws of gravity which have never been disproven in any laboratory experiment or observation. The "edges" of the cylinder would be further from the center point of the cylinder for some unexplained reason, as if someone had cookie cutter punched them out of a sheet and placed them in the sky. We must also consider the day night cycle, and how constellations move across the sky. All of these things are observable from your own backyard and contradict any theory that suggests these celestial bodies are not spherical and not acting under gravitational and centrifugal forces.
"How this is kept hidden"
It isn't just NASA, it would have to be a global collaboration between space agencies, between nations which are enemies, China, Russia, the USA, to conceal the truth, in addition to private entities which have launched sattelites into space. There are also many, many people working for these agencies who may not directly benefit from the high budget, and not one janitor has been a whistle-blower and leaked documents or images that contradict what is globally accepted? I find that hard to believe and more unlikely than that at least most of if not all of the photos and images taken from space by all of these agencies are real.
Lol!