7
PedeInspector 7 points ago +7 / -0

If the data I used to reach these numbers is accurate and represents what happened to the real votes, it would mean widespread fraud across ~47 states.

We'll have to wait for Georgia to finish their hand recount before we know whether the data is accurate or not though.

22
PedeInspector 22 points ago +22 / -0

If the hand recount in Georgia proves that this data is real, it will make this post into a prediction of the fraud found there. And afterwards, this post might be used as evidence that there is fraud in multiple other states as well. But don't take my word for it, I don't know shit about law.

51
PedeInspector 51 points ago +53 / -2

That is indeed the case in many states, but if we assume that this is indeed fraud by DNC/Biden, it would be expected to see something like that, I would definitely do that in order to make myself look innocent, then take those votes from 3rd party instead, you have plausible deniability and a ton of extra votes that way.

33
PedeInspector 33 points ago +34 / -1

I think that if this is indeed the result of fraud by the DNC/Biden, we shouldn't be looking at what Trump lost, but at what 3rd party lost and Biden gained.

222
PedeInspector 222 points ago +223 / -1

Seems I forgot Wyoming, and I can't edit the thread for some reason.

Wyoming

Trump to Biden 0

Trump to 3rd 0

Biden to Trump 0

Biden to 3rd 0

3rd to Biden 49

3rd to Trump 220

//////////////////

Trump to 3rd 0

Trump to Biden 0

Biden to 3rd 0

Biden to Trump 0

3rd to Trump 270

3rd to Biden 0

3
PedeInspector 3 points ago +3 / -0

I've update the my list that made it to the top of all.

https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8XQHhVH/updated-glitch-list/

If we assume that indeed all those 3rd party votes were switched to Biden, all of them would flip.

4
PedeInspector 4 points ago +4 / -0

It is possible that those 3rd party votes flipped to Trump instead of Biden, we have no way of knowing who got them, but I think it is safe to assume Biden did, and some of those were flipped to Trump to cover their tracks.

We can't really assume that the data is reliable until Georgia finishes their hand recount though. Antrim county isn't enough proof just yet.

5
PedeInspector 5 points ago +6 / -1

It already reached them, thank you though.

75
PedeInspector 75 points ago +75 / -0

I believe the way it works, is like this:

Dominion counts the votes and that's where the 'glitches' happen, then the result goes to the county website AND Edison Research, from Edison Research it goes to the NYT.

So there will be no discrepancy between the two.

78
PedeInspector 78 points ago +78 / -0

I would really want to know that too, finding that out might be the last piece of the puzzle. The fact that the Antrim County glitch shows up in the data though, confirms that it is indeed official data and represents the 'status' of the real count that the government has.

59
PedeInspector 59 points ago +60 / -1

Neither would affect the results at all.

69
PedeInspector 69 points ago +70 / -1

Sadly, it is the data itself that only uses three decimals, you can see it here https://static01.nyt.com/elections-assets/2020/data/api/2020-11-03/race-page/pennsylvania/president.json

But it is definitely not due to any rounding error that these switches and lost votes happen. Why are there so many states with 0 switches and 0 lost votes for example?

67
PedeInspector 67 points ago +67 / -0

If you run the code, findfraud('michigan') You'll see that the first thing it finds is Index 28 Past Index 27, with -5420 votes for Donald Trump, if you do the math yourself, you'll see that 3,096 of Trump's votes went to Biden, and that along with that, Trump also lost 2,324 votes, basically they were deleted, and if you add those two numbers up, you get 5420, the amount of votes that news articles claim were 'glitched' in Antrim county in Michigan.

The code isn't that great, but the results are VERY close to the real thing as Antrim county proved.

139
PedeInspector 139 points ago +140 / -1

Yeah, but all the data can be checked by other coder pedes, they can get the data straight from the source too, they don't have to use the one I downloaded, and if they check it, they'll see that everything matches.

69
PedeInspector 69 points ago +69 / -0

The biggest switch seems to be this one in Pennsylvania, 12,401 Trump votes went to Biden, and another 275,518 were 'deleted' from Trump.

51
PedeInspector 51 points ago +51 / -0

Indeed, it's right in this picture

2,984,468 * 0.566 = 1,689,208 < Trump Before

2,984,522 * 0.56 = 1,671,332 < Trump After

It is off by a bit, because the ratios aren't that precise in the data, but they are precise enough to help us find when the switches happened, and to get a VERY close number.

73
PedeInspector 73 points ago +74 / -1

There were indeed switches that went from Biden to Trump, albeit a LOT smaller, for example, in Pennsylvania, 220,883 Trump votes were switched to Biden, and 24,721 Biden votes were switched to Trump, only reason I didn't mention the other way around, was because I wanted it to get to the top and in the eyes of the Trump team as soon as possible, and thought it might be possible that it impedes that.

34
PedeInspector 34 points ago +34 / -0

It is indeed, here < That's the video where the PA glitch that I mention in the start of the original post happens.

51
PedeInspector 51 points ago +51 / -0

I'm actually not an American pede, so I'd rather someone else do that, maybe one of the mods, and refer the team to the post or something.

31
PedeInspector 31 points ago +31 / -0

There were indeed switches that went from Biden to Trump, albeit a LOT smaller, for example, in Pennsylvania, 220,883 Trump votes were switched to Biden, and 24,721 Biden votes were switched to Trump, only reason I didn't mention the other way around, was because I wanted it to get to the top and in the eyes of the Trump team as soon as possible, and thought it might be possible that it impedes that.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›