1
pepe-wont-stop 1 point ago +1 / -0

I certainly see that logic. So you think that FOX/Tucker are willing to take a hit (pretty substantial one, I think Tuck lost 33%) in ratings and in market share to protect against fraud investigations? IDK I think they like making more money. No?

1
pepe-wont-stop 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just like you, I'll let it play out. Like I said in another comment below, I'll be right there with you guys if it's just because of Fox money.

1
pepe-wont-stop 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah I hope not, if so then I'm right there with you ready to toss him out.

1
pepe-wont-stop 1 point ago +1 / -0

No, I think you missed my point. The right leaning boomers are hoping Sidney is going to drop the bomb, I'm not saying he's pandering to them.

The lefties just may flock to Tucker and be able to see the happening instead of being blacked out by MSNBC.

1
pepe-wont-stop 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thanks dude, I just couldn't believe he'd be the one to turn so I tried to rack my brain as to why. I really hope it isn't muh dollars from FOX, but it very well could be that as well.

2
pepe-wont-stop 2 points ago +2 / -0

I get that, pede for sure. Just a theory muh guy.

1
pepe-wont-stop 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes, that is what I am saying. Tuck has owned so many lefties for us in the past with grace and elegance, I don't see him turning on us. Again, like in my post, I could be wrong. Hence THEORY.

2
pepe-wont-stop 2 points ago +2 / -0

HIs bigger audience that is comprised of whom?

view more: Next ›