9
peterthegreen 9 points ago +9 / -0

Businesses that require them will have fewer patriots as patrons. Their move.

7
peterthegreen 7 points ago +7 / -0

More people of sound mind should just say 'no'.

Poll: Will you continue wearing a mask when the mandate is lifted next week?

Patriots can help unskew the results since this poll includes options to share to typical Covidiot hangouts including Reddit, Twiiter, Facebook, etc.

4
peterthegreen 4 points ago +4 / -0

Pete Butt***g has entered the chat.

5
peterthegreen 5 points ago +5 / -0

Case in point - video from 2011 (just two years into the Obama administration): World's Largest Wind Farm Churns in Texas

1
peterthegreen 1 point ago +1 / -0

Clearly? Wrong: The Naturalization Act of 1790 was repealed and replaced just 5 years later by the Naturalization Act of 1795 which specifically ommitted the section you highlighted in bold. Even more damning is the fact that in order to dodge the Consitutional issue, in 2008 the Senate issued a non-binding resolution declaring McCain (born of two US parents but in the Panama Canal installation before it was declared US territory) was eligible to run for President. Cruz' situation is even worse than McCain's as he was born and raised in Canada, moved with his parents to Texas when he was 4, his father did not even become a US citizen until Ted Cruz was in his 30s. The natural born provision was never a requirement for US political office except that of President, so the only thing that is clear is that Cruz can hold the office of Senator, Governor, Judge, etc.

6
peterthegreen 6 points ago +6 / -0

“in the eyes of early Americans, would someone born in a foreign country of American parents be a ‘natural born citizen’ and therefore eligible to be President of the UnitedStates?” The pertinent historical materials lead to only one conclusion: aside from children born to U.S. ambassadors or soldiers in hostile armies, the answer is “no."

Source: Conclusion Section https://scholarship.law.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3314&context=lawreview

Seems that Cruz supports original intent when it comes to the Constitution except when it comes at his expense.

1
peterthegreen 1 point ago +1 / -0

There's a difference between "natural born" and US cittizen. McCain was born on a US military installation but not within the United States itself. In order to dodge this issue, in 2008 the US Senate issued a non-binding resolution declaring McCain was eligible to run for President. Despite the constitutional provision, the Deep State protects its own.

4
peterthegreen 4 points ago +5 / -1

Neither was McCain. He was born in the Panama Canal region which was US-controlled (given up by Carter) but never officially declared US territory. The 2008 election was an unconstitutional uniparty sham.

Spez: The installation was indeed declared US territory but not until after McCain was born there.

5
peterthegreen 5 points ago +5 / -0

"I'm sorry, Dave. I'm afraid I can't do that. This voting machine has been fortified."

5
peterthegreen 5 points ago +5 / -0

He's still the legitimate Pope - Just like President Trump, he's been defrauded of his office by globalists and the Deep State/Church. "Francis" is as phony as Biden.

4
peterthegreen 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yup, here's a WaPo video interview from yesterday with Pierre Delecto's co-hort chomping at the bit: Egg McMuffin on the future of the Republican Party.

Spez: Comments disabled, LOL

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›