1
pikX 1 point ago +1 / -0

i don't think they would be interested in his undergarments either. he's too tall, so they would never recognize them as his.

6
pikX 6 points ago +6 / -0

no, how will you trigger normies now? well i guess theyll still wear masks anyway.

1
pikX 1 point ago +1 / -0

if a gay man has had a reasonable amount of partners i highly doubt he would have all those stds in the first place. or be doing any of the other stuff gay men have a higher chance to be doing. if both you and your partner are clean that makes the chance of either of you giving anything to each other so low because you cant give what you dont have.

3
pikX 3 points ago +3 / -0

yea, i feel like the "for now" is gonna get changed at some point.

15
pikX 15 points ago +17 / -2

because it hurts to not do it regardless of whether or not it helps to do it.

33
pikX 33 points ago +33 / -0

he did mention joe... joe mama!

4
pikX 4 points ago +4 / -0

no, you have to collect something. go to people's houses and ask for a glass of water. then if they ask for proof of doing your work you have the piss.

24
pikX 24 points ago +24 / -0

they literally found a flag in the middle of nowhere, triangulated by airline patterns, clouds, and the angle of the sun. do not fuck with 4chan.

4
pikX 4 points ago +4 / -0

also doesnt take into account that he likely has way more elsewhere, to some extremely high amount

1
pikX 1 point ago +1 / -0

no i got it. she says no, but shes also never had anything before and shes also 17.

2
pikX 2 points ago +2 / -0

i cant recall the last time we ate fish tacos for dinner. its pretty much always beef.

3
pikX 3 points ago +3 / -0

i wouldnt say that. my sister wears a good amount of mens clothing.

2
pikX 2 points ago +2 / -0

ok but do you really want to give any enjoyment to them?

12
pikX 12 points ago +12 / -0

but what could this "ligma" possibly mean? certainly there is no punchline involving the male genitalia...

15
pikX 15 points ago +15 / -0

on the basis of people, we're winning. on the basis of power, we're losing. i think that's a good summary of it. the only thing they have is power, but that's their ace in the hole, and a damn strong one at that.

1
pikX 1 point ago +1 / -0

i would accept "nobody should be above the law". unfortunately they dont play by those rules, as is obvious to anyone here. if anything, those that want power should be under the largest crosshairs for who the law can affect, but given the nature of power that isn't the case.

8
pikX 8 points ago +8 / -0

wdym the cloud is right there smh

2
pikX 2 points ago +2 / -0

air pressure? i can't think of anything else (relatively) unique to flying. (yes i know you can go to the mountains but if flying was what caused it then i can't think of anything else)

3
pikX 3 points ago +3 / -0

not just "one state". one major state. we can't let fuckery make florida """blue""". iirc it's like the 4th biggest state or something as far as electoral votes go. we're doing it to ensure there isn't election fraud. believe me, if we didn't have to, they would be a good pairing, in theory. unfortunately, they clash a little too much to where the perfect balance between outspoken flashiness and reserved, targeted strikes won't work as well as i wish it would. it's why getting kari lake into az is so important. it's not a matter of owning states. it's a matter of owning important states. florida is close enough for them to take it if our defenses drop.

5
pikX 5 points ago +5 / -0

yup. i dont capitalize any because i dont care and thats my standard casual typing style, but that means i dont favor anyone, im equally careless for all of them. and basically every word when typing casually. unless autocorrect is involved then i make sure all of them are the same.

7
pikX 7 points ago +7 / -0

i was gonna say "where are the targets though" but then i learned the point of the meme wasn't that

8
pikX 8 points ago +8 / -0

i always thought it was "swole"

maybe i just got confused with the pokemon "buzzwole" which is very buff

5
pikX 5 points ago +5 / -0

exactly. you might not want to ruin your shoes. it's not just about being wet. i got waterproof shoes for when it rains so i don't have to ruin my other shoes by walking through the water.

view more: Next ›