5
pithys 5 points ago +5 / -0

It's crunch time. He is saying dems are trying to remove trump even before jan 6. Also this past week showed Trump is surrounded by manipulating lawyers

40
pithys 40 points ago +43 / -3

she's attractive for sure. One thing bad about this era is that people can look completely different from their social media than in real life

4
pithys 4 points ago +4 / -0

Fortunately, that might have been only the first round in the fight to preserve the nation. A strategy exists to re-submit the Texas challenge under the Electors Clause to the Supreme Court in a way that even that Court could not dare refuse to consider. Just because Texas did not persuade the Justices that what happens in Pennsylvania hurts Texas does not mean that the United States of America could not persuade the justices that when Pennsylvania violates the U.S. Constitution, it harms the nation. Article III, § 2, cl. 2 confers original jurisdiction on the Supreme Court in any case suit brought by the United States against a state. Thus, the United States can and should file suit against Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan and Wisconsin. Like the Texas suit, that new suit would seek an order invalidating the appointment of the electors appointed by those four defendant States that refused to abide by the terms of the Presidential Electors Clause. That would leave it to the state legislatures in those four states to “appoint” electors — which is what the Constitution requires.

When those four States violated the Constitution by allowing electors who had not been appointed in the manner prescribed by the state legislature, the United States suffered an injury. Indeed, there could hardly have been a more significant injury to the nation than that which corrupted its Presidential election.

The United States has a vital interest and a responsibility to preserve the constitutional framework of the Republic, which was formed by a voluntary compact among the States. As with any contractual relationship of participants in an ongoing enterprise, no party is entitled to ignore or alter the essential terms of the contract by its unilateral action.

The President who has sworn to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution has the right and the duty to order the U.S. Department of Justice bring such an action in the Supreme Court — and should do so quickly.

1
pithys 1 point ago +1 / -0

I hope he's seen enough. Also could be red pilled if there's actually evidence of obama spying etc

4
pithys 4 points ago +4 / -0

would've won if he was pardoned 2 years ago. I bet leakers felt much safer leaking to wikileaks than trust regular people

2
pithys 2 points ago +2 / -0

'natural causes'

1
pithys 1 point ago +1 / -0

SCOTUS probably uses random number generator to see if they will have standing

8
pithys 8 points ago +9 / -1

another tweet said adam schiff arrested... If true it would be epic for him to be arrested on christmas eve

4
pithys 4 points ago +4 / -0

I hope watermelon head is arrested but this looks too good to be true

2
pithys 2 points ago +2 / -0

a campaign started by a constitutional lawyer called Ives i'm pretty sure. He said Pence had to write letters to contested states saying he was throwing out electors slates... It's interesting but they are trying to certify the alternative electors so it would disrupt that

by NoWay1
0
pithys 0 points ago +1 / -1

you think byrne made all this up? And he made up and leaked that they talked about martial law?

I don't buy that. I think Trumps surrounded by doomers and manipulators right now and byrne/flynn exposed it

5
pithys 5 points ago +5 / -0

the end of the article:

Will the Republican leadership stand up and disqualify these votes and assign all their electoral votes to President Trump or will the President have to continue to fight alone?

1
pithys 1 point ago +1 / -0

Pence said yesterday for the first time he will keep fighting this election

1
pithys 1 point ago +1 / -0

because if he rejected them, he would also be rejecting the alternate slates which could still be certified

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›