1
pithys 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't know much about Jones. From first impressions I'm a little weary he sounds too much like a politician. To be fair Cruz was like that 4 years ago though

2
pithys 2 points ago +2 / -0

i was trying to use streamable since it embeds, but they make you pay for long videos lol

1
pithys 1 point ago +1 / -0

honestly any absentee or mail ins should have a stricter deadline of the day BEFORE Nov 3, so we know exactly how many there are

1
pithys 1 point ago +1 / -0

All might not be lost. Powell has bashed 3 letter agencies for awhile now. Maybe Barr is actually going to do something but is waiting for her investigations to be over first

13
pithys 13 points ago +13 / -0

that's part of the great reset. They want small family businesses to die while big monopolies and government take everything

1
pithys 1 point ago +1 / -0

any vote not in the main warehouse by 8pm on Nov 3 should be disregarded completely

7
pithys 7 points ago +7 / -0

The first recount was hand count and I believe any after are machined. None of this matters, we need signature verification

1
pithys 1 point ago +1 / -0

yes that's exactly what they did with this 100 ballot sample size. They found 2 ballots that were changed

1
pithys 1 point ago +1 / -0

True I guess the difference is it spreading but still way less deaths

1
pithys 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's easier for poll workers to take a fresh ballot and recreate that ballot by filling in the same bubbles.

The poll worker is supposed to recreate a Trump ballot but fills in Biden instead.

1
pithys 1 point ago +1 / -0

heavily taxed though... and they don't allow smoking on a lot of campuses. But obviously this shit is overblown if flu deaths are basically included in covid deaths

1
pithys 1 point ago +1 / -0

no... imagine if a ballot has a rip. It's not going to feed through a scanner. It's easier for poll workers to take a fresh ballot and recreate that ballot by filling in the same bubbles. It's simpler for them because they can count all ballots thru the machine instead of having a manual count of unscannable ballots

1
pithys 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes that's how they caught 2 ballots out of the 100. The originals must be kept to compare later if someone audits

3
pithys 3 points ago +3 / -0

the duplicated ballots are when a ballot that cant be scanned (it got a rip or had the market bleed through) so they have a poll worker 'recreate' the ballot by filling the same bubbles on a fresh ballot. The problem is people have biases and can change the bubbles. There's only about 20k of these duplicated ballots

7
pithys 7 points ago +7 / -0

what's kraken folks

2
pithys 2 points ago +2 / -0

turns out these are ballots that couldn't be scanned. So they had to be duplicated by people onto new ballots. So obviously someone can easily cheat by changing from the original

16
pithys 16 points ago +16 / -0

There's only 20k duplicate ballots which are the ones hand filled out later. We also need a signature verification

51
pithys 51 points ago +51 / -0

"to settle scores for Trump" He hasn't done jack shit while he's in there, why would he settle anything later?

11
pithys 11 points ago +11 / -0

I think it's pretty likely those are them. The sharpies make the ballots unreadable by the scanners, so they need to be duplicated

8
pithys 8 points ago +8 / -0

So 1 ballot thrown out, and 1 changed to biden. That's a 3 point swing.

But how many duplicated ballots are there? We probably also need signature check

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›