1
plasssticman 1 point ago +1 / -0

The proper punishment would have been to make him write the definition of "sedition" 14000 times.

1
plasssticman 1 point ago +1 / -0

So much for "save the Polar Bears".

So is seal clubbing is back on?

1
plasssticman 1 point ago +1 / -0

He only lost out because Swalwell's ass opened up so wide it ate Feng Feng. You see Feng Feng was actually a nine before Swalwell's ass got a hold of her. It just wanted a little Chinese.

1
plasssticman 1 point ago +1 / -0

Maybe they are just projecting how they like to bbq children.

1
plasssticman 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's what I hired Trump to do in 2016. I consider him my Goverzilla Wrecking Ball. It's almost like he's got more power outside of Goverzilla.

4
plasssticman 4 points ago +4 / -0

Buttguy will single handedly destroy the travel industry, a feat only 9/11 could attempt.

1
plasssticman 1 point ago +1 / -0

Of the three defensive gun uses in my life not once did I even have to aim, much less fire.

The mere existence of the gun, my body language, and projecting a clear voice was all that was necessary.

15
plasssticman 15 points ago +16 / -1

NOPE! He's such a whiny bitch that when I called him out for smearing Dr. Peterson for not kissing his ring when he "made him famous" he blocked me. He talks big but can't handle it when a simple Frog calls him out for poor behavior. For the record this was during the time Dr. Peterson was hospitalized. He could have manned up and said "my bad, I shouldn't have kicked a man when he's down", but instead he ran straight to cancel culture. If he gains more power than being an attorney WATCH OUT! He will be dangerous. Again - he's an ATTORNEY - don't trust him.

1
plasssticman 1 point ago +1 / -0

I tried to show people what they might have in their masks with a blacklight flashlight. Every single person was too ignorant to understand. Outright rejected the idea.

1
plasssticman 1 point ago +1 / -0

I am talking about a major disruption in the proceedings. A direct flouting of THEIR procedures. Forget the "impeachment trial". How do you introduce evidence? It's not about a trial, it's about having a platform to send a message.

What would happen, and by that what would the entire world think if they tuned in to ImpeachMintsTV, watch Trump dump piles of evidence of corruption and worse of the very people judging him? Flip that script.

Would they turn the cameras off? And if so, what would all the people around the world think of the veracity of such evidence being displayed and then, at some point, the cameras shut off? Would the masses believe it more or less.

Trump can destroy the process itself by going in there personally and dominating the proceedings. The court of public opinion would force the traitors out.

Or he could drop proof of USA INC being a dead entity. Which would make the whole thing NULL AND VOID. You know - 'cause they'd be powerless. (haha)

GAME OVER!

2
plasssticman 2 points ago +2 / -0

I should have been clearer. I'm not talking about election rigging evidence, I'm talking about evidence of treason and pedo. If they arrest him it will kick off war.

1
plasssticman 1 point ago +2 / -1

By participating he can hijack the proceedings and drop evidence. Tell me the WHOLE world won't be watching if Trump shows up. What will they do if he shows up and drops volumes of evidence on LIVE TV?!

14
plasssticman 14 points ago +14 / -0

Since courts ruled that President Trump was not allowed to block someone on twatter, doesn't that mean that ALL of the conservatives booted from twatter have a standing to sue now?

0
plasssticman 0 points ago +1 / -1

The Republic died in 1871. Now it's time to SMOTHER democracy and make this a Republic again. This time there needs to be some serious penalties for betraying us.

2
plasssticman 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't think this goes far enough - factory reset your phones people.

I do like the LinkedIn joke - but they are an info-honeypot as well.

1
plasssticman 1 point ago +1 / -0

And the moment you turn around [Peter Strzok smirk].

view more: Next ›