2
poconopede 2 points ago +2 / -0

oh the shadows. they should be different lol yeah there's editing issues in the "live" video.

10
poconopede 10 points ago +10 / -0

OG americans yeah why not? u.s. govt. ruined that whole relationship too.

2
poconopede 2 points ago +2 / -0

govern - command/rule -ment - mind

1
poconopede 1 point ago +1 / -0

duh thats all they ever did. use ppl to prop up their own interests.

2
poconopede 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah sure whatever u say all knowing internet guy

2
poconopede 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sources from some college somewhere if I were to guess lol

Stomach it so you’ll know how to respond and know how they act

31
poconopede 31 points ago +31 / -0

omg the binder. that was always awesome. its like screenshots for the press IRL lol

1
poconopede 1 point ago +1 / -0

everyone's so butthurt lately. ad hominem ad hominem wahh. u should be certain of your english education well read before poking at ppl on the internet. different regions have different usages. its a big country.

put on your ass = knocking down put out on your ass = kicked out / removed

im plenty familiar with the phrase. the "right" sucks at arguments and definitions. it why they lose so much and continue to be the whipping boy for the "left".

1
poconopede 1 point ago +1 / -0

i solely hit the arguments until ur condescending mannerism took root. it was interesting discourse but i could see the dissonance. see ya later

0
poconopede 0 points ago +1 / -1

alright good luck learning how to be free! :D your responses followed the fetishized constitutionalist to a "T". certainly the best out of all current systems but far from ideal.

3
poconopede 3 points ago +3 / -0

idk if its "for biden" or "a guy" as it trails off

0
poconopede 0 points ago +1 / -1

economic Darwinism would be capitalism. the state wouldn't be bailing anyone out.

the founders knew what tyranny government could bring. why they set up a stronger federal level i have no idea. everyone seemed content with their states at the time.

fringe would also denote a nuanced individuality which pure freedom allows so im cool with that. make ur own choices and no one else's.

-3
poconopede -3 points ago +2 / -5

i gave good advice, looked for clarity, and thats malicious? when did the sjw's join .win?

again. theres little inflection in a text format. this is why social media fails at discourse and fuels arguments.

1
poconopede 1 point ago +1 / -0

fleets of subs are run by admirals but sure i guess. note how under the assumption of statism military is necessary. without a state there would be private defense available to everyone. the only way militaries are funded is through taxation. murder is illegal under state law but ya know human nature. still happens and many states dont let ppl protect themselves "legally" as if u need permission to guard ur own life.

FURTHER, would u say the u.s. was invaded already? #election

2
poconopede 2 points ago +2 / -0

could also be over exposure on the camera. who knows. lol everyone will know sooner or later.

4
poconopede 4 points ago +7 / -3

theres no "out" in the original post.

out on ass / on ass

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›