Savanah Hernandez has a lot of short videos on the DC march and the Antifa madness that comes out esp. when it gets dark: https://twitter.com/sav_says_
Sorry you went through this. DId you take any of the vitamins, etc. suggested? Vit C, VitD, Quercetin, zinc, NAC? For anyone, a fever for many, many days is NOT good. You need something. I've been taking all the above at least every other day, and every day when I worked the elections as a preventative/protective. But if you have symptoms, or if you're around people all day, you can possibly either get HCQ as a prophylaxis or as a just-in-case treatment via an affordable (up to $90) telehealth call: https://speakwithanmd.com/ + medicines that would probably be less than that.
If their symptoms are now from the second stage of the illness, not the virus, suggest to them to take NAC or Glutathione along with VitD - the first is a strong antioxidant and lung protector. Dr. Roger Seheult has taken NAC among other things as a preventative, but some suggest it as something that stops the cytokine storm - this young man had his mother take it when HCQ wasn't doing the trick (not taken early enough probably) nypost.com/2020/05/09/new-york-mom-with-coronavirus-saved-by-medical-student-son/
But there are also uninformed voters that save our asses from the wrongly-informed "smart" people. On the other hand, we need to somehow get rid of the ballot harvesting and all that crap - because those are taken from people who actually don't care enough and taken for ONE candidate - the harvester's. Honestly have no idea how to stop that - very few face jail time and there's $$ in it.
Yeah, honestly though I'd prefer NOT to be the type to cut off friends because of politics - because that's supposed to be the Left's modus operandus, if they've got full-blown TDS, what's the point? After Trump is no longer president, they may miraculously recover and you could be friends again :) For this reason I won't unfriend people - I'll just mute them. Also, I still hate Facebook so still don't want to use them often.
No, it's almost all popular magazines too - the frivolous crap. It's ALL anti-Trump, pro-dividing the country (unless you support 100% what the Left says of course). So the vain people who don't care about politics get fed anti-Trump propaganda. So gross.
What would be great is to actually graph a bunch of different counties, not just the ones that were allegedly screwed with - counties where the vote spread between straight ticket and indiv Trump support was not so different. Also comparing strong Dem areas. My math friend actually was skeptical about the numbers and would like to see the actual numbers of votes. I'd like to see a whole website dedicated to analyses of these.
You've got a lot of patience to listen to the whole thing - amazing! Believe me, I hate to be a downer.
I should say that my previous comment is an opinion - I don't know what acts fall under coercion.
On the positive side, I think we've got 3 places to get great impact for a Trump win and 1 not great pathway: 1) the software-switched and dropped votes in some states, 2) possibly (fingers crossed) get the unobserved middle-of-the-night impossible-to-match to voters ballots disqualified. That will enrage people - which is what they intended in order to get away with it - clever bastards. 3) discarding votes from dead/moved people 4) also really unpopular and unlikely - legislatures having balls and picking electors (sets a scary precedent for majority dem legislatures of the future, though)
We NEED easily-auditable nationwide voting standards - why the hell don't we have them? We all have social security numbers. Sometimes this state vs fed'l stuff pisses me off. I KNOW why it exists, and of course there's an advantage - I live in one of the most open (covid-wise) states and would hate stupid national mandates, but our election system is putrid.
I am optimistic about a Trump win! There was too much fraud they had to make up.
Duress (I think) is like deprivation of water, food and sleep, threatening, lying about having evidence against the interviewee, etc. This investigator went above and beyond to show he was being straight-forward. Let the worker kind of lead by his own comfort level. The investigator's saying not to talk to anyone during the break (though it was perfectly allowed to do so) was clever. This could be used in an interrogations course.
I agree the full audio is painful to HEAR https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QkNkQ2nDQfc, but the responses were in no way coerced. This makes O'Keefe look like a manipulator by initially posting such a tiny snippet and thus will easily lead people to dismiss him for other things for which he has much better statements - like the Bernie campaign workers admitting how radical they are (although that could also be labeled just talk, not intent).
The worker was manipulated, but he willingly said he'd been doubting himself already. I listened until about 1hr 10minutes - it was brutal (and boring to the get to the bad stuff). It's worth listening from 43 to 50 minutes or so. That's when the investigator makes the postal worker really doubt what he heard, all the while saying, "I understand" and "we all make mistakes." It's boiler plate tactics that worked.
Honestly, from the beginning, I didn't think this worker's overhearing some words was much evidence of anything, and there was no proof a LOT of ballots were affected. The lefties will say "well, all votes should count" - this wasn't an example of dumped ballots unless there were piles dumped which were then postmarked.
From 1:07 there's another section about postmarking and the investigator commiserates and says that it's logical to come to the conclusions the worker did in spite of what he thought he heard. Ouch. Just a big fucking OUCH. And Trump retweeted that the worker didn't recant. Okay, maybe the guy didn't technically, but fuck. He says what he overheard he interpreted as untoward stuff but wasn't sure. I'm not sure the average lawyer would have helped much except to tell him what not to do. And let's not pretend this is because this guy is dumb. It doesn't matter. You talk to an investigator and you take enormous risks. Your words get turned around, all while you're being convinced that the guy is on your side. I feel sorry for the guy. Damn.
I am not sure - it depends on the county, state, etc. But it would be logical to make the mailed-in one different from an in-person ballot. Those areas that want to hide more fraud could use the same ballot type - hmmm.
Me except the last part! I don't understand why blockchain couldn't be used to enhance chain-of-custody issues. Mail-in ballots should absolutely have some sort of identifier to verify when it was sent out, etc. I would really like to know how states like Florida do it.
Ah, right! I forgot you don't need the actual ballots which will be gone. If the data is still out there which it should be, great! Granted, this was a state where you had straight-ticket and individual options. In Texas, for example, that is no longer the case. I'd LOVE to see that.
And the two other analysts on the call? Plus he asked for other people to give their own analyses whether it confirms or denies theirs, and he claimed the weighted voting feature was in the machines' operating manuals which would be easy to check.
Yes, I would have gone but it's like entering enemy territory - D.C. is so horrid and I didn't have faith that the police would really protect anyone.