9
poobusdoobus 9 points ago +9 / -0

Very good! Unpopular opinion, but this is actually why we need history (a humanity!) because ideally, it emphasizes looking at primary sources and weighing them to get information. The problem now-a-days is so many historians and teachers in similar humanities subject don't do this, or if they do, they don't think "hey, maybe I should look at primary sources in my own life instead of just trusting what someone else spoon-feeds me."

5
poobusdoobus 5 points ago +5 / -0

Thanks for the preface. Trump isn't Jesus, but man if they won't use him to crucify historically Christians values.

"For our struggle is not against enemies of blood and flesh, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the cosmic powers of this present darkness, against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly places" ~ Ephesians 6:12

1
poobusdoobus 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's the strategy. One person who held to this view did this, so anything associated with that view must now be censored.

-2
poobusdoobus -2 points ago +1 / -3

I can assure you that I do not do the dudes. I'm just more skeptical than most.

-1
poobusdoobus -1 points ago +1 / -2

You're just giving fuel for the left to call us all racists with that term. People see what you're doing.

1
poobusdoobus 1 point ago +2 / -1

Thank you. Everyone just needs to be patient, see what happens. The Texas case may have been rejected because the justices legitimately thought Texas didn't have proper standing. They don't want to throw out what they believe is the rule of law, even if there is a legitimate case apart from it. Trump, however, would have proper standing. We'll see what happens.

5
poobusdoobus 5 points ago +5 / -0

I think this is on target. These people all know each other. From what I've seen, Tucker pulled his punches on Hunter but then relented when the major porn leaks happened. It's like lawyers in a small town. They can be ferocious opponents in public court, but they'll have lunch. That doesn't mean you're lawyer's bought off by the other guy.

1
poobusdoobus 1 point ago +1 / -0

Agreed. I'm in favor of vaccination in general, but I don't think this specific vaccine should be mandatory.

3
poobusdoobus 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's in Hallie's texts, which are mostly mundane family matters and her kids texting her "mommy" again and again.

2
poobusdoobus 2 points ago +2 / -0

yeah, the texts from Hallie's phone. Haha, sorry, I got a bit excited when I posted.

7
poobusdoobus 7 points ago +13 / -6 (edited)

Eh, guys, I've been around since 2016. While I personally haven't had people I know die, my sister had coworkers that died. My girlfriend's dad has had friends that died. I talked with a woman yesterday who had lost several people to COV-ID. I'm all for winning and being on the Trump Train and yeah, the whole COV-ID thing is overblown, but I think this overblown flippancy, the either don't wear a mask, don't take a vaccine, don't even believe in vaccines, and make light of COV-ID completely or you don't support Trump attitude is ridiculous.

14
poobusdoobus 14 points ago +15 / -1

His head is both entirely up his buttocks and his neck also bends backwards at a complete 180 degrees. It's quite impressive.

2
poobusdoobus 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thanks for this. I was looking for a good explanation and it's nice to here it from a professional in the field.

4
poobusdoobus 4 points ago +5 / -1

look at all those ding dong reporters yelling about the election

2
poobusdoobus 2 points ago +2 / -0

Seriously. He had the Republican party handed to him on a plate and screwed it up. It was my impression that Steele just didn't do a good job with the Republican party and since tried to ingratiate himself with the Democrats. Somewhat like Romney and McCain.

view more: Next ›