3
powershellder 3 points ago +3 / -0

Hopefully you won’t be able to because they will be defunded and our of business.

11
powershellder 11 points ago +11 / -0

Didn’t they also kill a Kennedy for that too?

1
powershellder 1 point ago +1 / -0

did Obama pass this law?

debunked. Presidents don’t pass laws, Congress does.

3
powershellder 3 points ago +3 / -0

I wholeheartedly believe this has to do with the lockdown they just barely announced.

Herbert was against it until a week after the election.

Republicans are complicit. He stands to make a lot of money if Trump is out.

6
powershellder 6 points ago +6 / -0

You don’t have to be “antivaxx” to recognize some severe issues with vaccine safety.

There is a massive propaganda campaign around all vaccines and there are very questionable practices such as:

-no true placebos: vaccines are tested against other vaccines or vaccine ingredients during trials, not with a true placebo like saline solution. This downplays how many adverse reactions there truly are because both groups have reactions and therefore it is “no more dangerous than the placebo”. Remember, someone just barely died from the placebo (meningitis vaccine) in the recent covid trial.

-manufacturers are exempt from lawsuits for faulty products. Unlike every other pharma product, you can’t sue if vaccines harm you.

-in exchange for exemption, Congress was supposed to perform safety studies. They have not been conducted for over 30 years.

3
powershellder 3 points ago +3 / -0

The socialism and propaganda is seeping in there too since it hit r/all.

There’s no way this many hardcore capitalists are in favor of Biden’s horrible tax plans.

7
powershellder 7 points ago +7 / -0

To add to this, look at some of the crap associated with the flu shot: https://www.reddit.com/r/axolotl_peyotl/comments/7rrcwq/comment/dsyzsqz

Sorry for Reddit, but a very good (and sourced) breakdown. Plus, he has great information on most vaccines if you want to jump down a wormhole

2
powershellder 2 points ago +3 / -1

Except the “placebo” is another vaccine and both groups have serious side effects, but “this vaccine is no more harmful than the placebo”.

Someone died in a recent vaccine trial from the placebo: an approved meningitis vaccine.

The meningitis trial placebo? The pneumococcal vaccine.

The pneumococcal vaccine placebo? Another vaccine.

Vaccine numbers are always Heavily manipulated.

1
powershellder 1 point ago +1 / -0

China needs us. It would be foolish to attack.

And if they did, India would jump in purely to stop China from gaining more power. Perhaps Russia And Korea as well.

We have a much better military than any of them, and with other allies, beat them with pure numbers as well.

1
powershellder 1 point ago +1 / -0

Reading about how vaccines theoretically work is much different from how they actually are.

There is an incredible amount of fraud in the pharma industry as a whole, and particularly with vaccines where manufacturers have no liability for faulty products.

2
powershellder 2 points ago +2 / -0

Utah just locked down yesterday though.

3
powershellder 3 points ago +3 / -0

At least for the flu shot, it’s more dangerous for the elderly to get it. This one is probably similar.

Plus, we have at least 3 very promising treatments including hydroxochloroquine.

I’d be weary of even the elderly getting it especially when we have alternatives.

It found that after decades and billions of dollars spent promoting flu shots for the elderly, the mass vaccination program did not result in saving lives. In fact, the death rate among the elderly increased substantially.

https://sharylattkisson.com/2015/09/govt-researchers-flu-shots-not-effective-in-elderly-after-all/

Official study is linked in the breakdown.

28
powershellder 28 points ago +28 / -0

Yes. Look at what they DO, not what they say.

They keep pushing taxes and building new things, instead of actually stopping pollution and conserving.

Driving a car from the 90’s is much more carbon efficient than mining the materials for all new cars.

Giving tax cuts to companies who offer working from home is much better than building new green buildings. It’s obvious.

They also do not care about any other pollution than harmless carbon. Pollution in aquifers is much more threatening.

Their actions imply that this is all a fraud.

2
powershellder 2 points ago +2 / -0

I’m not a pro investor, but it’s usually a bad idea to buy in right after it jumps on news.

If you really want it long term, wait for a dip or for it to stabilize before buying. Especially with pharma.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›