I'm sure nobody else has ever implemented software that can count before. Their "for loop" with an embedded "if statement" is truly too sophisticated to share.

Really, any level of sophistication that could be regarded as a trade secret within software built for a such a simple task is an anti-feature and any relationship with a government and their company should be severed immediately by them claiming to contain something so inappropriate in their product.

It seems like Dems have enough representation in basically every government office to at least slow walk any government investigation, release of information, or related process. They are reliably unprofessional and it is probably the easiest form of corruption. It hits us over and over again with exonerating evidence in the Russia hoax, incriminating evidence against Biden in Ukraine, this, the Flynn judge. The list goes on forever.

It probably is not really the programmers. The people who gave them the specs had some other explanation for the feature so the programmers implemented the basic feature without bothering to try to hide the fact that the feature was turned on for a particular run. The people who tried to pull it off didn't notice the bread crumbs since it superficially appeared to work. At least that would be my guess about how it would hypothetically play out.

Let them keep thinking they are until we pass the bill.

That is what I have thought too. It is actually a chance to gather data on several factors we may never have the chance to gather on again. Not just the masks, but all of the steps being taken. It would be really interesting to know what effect that will have on the flu or even the common cold.

They want the popular vote too, and California is probably the easiest place in the country to pick up a million or so fraudulent votes. Nobody is really going to spend a lot of resources verifying anything in a deep blue state .

Assuming they weren't backdated. Without this ruling that might have ended up being a moot point.

In other news, I have a really nice casket I'm willing to part with for 8 million. It is slightly used, but is worth 13 new!!!!

Pfizer opted out of one part of the warp speed program though were certainly part of other parts of the program such as the guarantees and fast-tracked fda approval. Some people are using the limited opt out to incorrectly state that Pfizer didn't participate at all.

I think he knows there was fraud as a lot of the techniques used are used by democrats every election. The ballot changes though just increased the surface area for fraud exponentially. It is a stretch from that too him necessarily knowing any specifics about the operations for this particular election. The DNC probably knows about most of them, but the fraud would have happened with or without him unless the dems nominated an unusually honest candidate who insisted they not operate as normal.

He would have a greater impact on Fox's bottom line by leaving, but he would lose his megaphone now and it is needed now more than ever. I think the timing of that kind of move should be considered carefully.

It probably is, but not knowing their system, it is possible they have some previously used machines/system that was still operational. It would have to be completely self-contained as you say and not running on the same hardware.

Yes, if there was an issue that late, it should have been well past any kind of freeze window. Either the change is not really important and thus can be put off until after the election, or if critica,l invalidated the use of the machines as an option and reverted to a hand count or whatever provably reliable backup method was already in place instead.

slippery slope is a "logical fallacy" based on some list(an appeal to authority) rather than a logical argument. It has a literal meaning that is true and is basic physics, and the figurative meaning is just implying that once you concede a principle like free speech or the right to bear arms, further restrictions along the same lines become easier. The reason people wrote down rights as hard lines in the sand is because this is true.

They are a pastime at best and a waste of time at worst. If the million best athletes on earth all had career ending injuries on the same day, It wouldn't matter at all. The next million could take their place and everything would just go on like before. The only annoying part would be sportscasters talking about it.

That seems to be the best thing. Moderation should be a user setting with available options including complete third parties. The core moderation might be for illegal content like child porn. All other moderation is at the discretion of the users who choose whatever group they trust to do their filtering.

Exculpatory evidence in an impeachment trial, and they hide it. How can a government agency like that even continue after something like this. What is the point. The US has less harmful enemies.

No doubt. It would be a once in a generation type of achievement towards middle east peace. If something like that happened, it would be ridiculous if he didn't get the Nobel peace prize. There can't be any real contenders since there are no accomplishments anywhere near this magnitude in this year or any other year in decades.

This is the right answer. A person may not know every term in existence and this is certainly forgivable. But if you don't know this one, you are clueless about border issues and your opinions are founded in ignorance.

Back then there was a lot more honor in politics as well. I know now that people reading this are thinking OF COURSE THE DEMOCRATS LIED!!!, but it wasn't always the case that you could not trust a gentlemen's agreement from them.

I root for anybody to think for themselves. The left is often vicious towards black people who don't toe the line so anybody who doesn't makes it a little easier for the next guy. Of course, just because someone is diverging from the party line it doesn't mean they will come to better conclusions, but it does make them eligible to come to better conclusions.

He makes a general statement about gaining citizenship in the US compared to other countries and then lists two ways which we are notoriously lax. He didn't say "with the exception of" so I'm not sure why the listed methods of gaining citizenship would be excluded. I do mostly agree with his post, but I don't think his initial statement is right at all. On whole, I am not seeing how our citizenship laws are particularly strict amongst western countries.

I don't talk to them. The media and the people who work with them are leftist partisans. Any information they gain will be used disproportionally to to help democrats, and there is no reason to expect they wouldn't leak it in some way to harm you if the situation presents itself to them.

I'm not sure where you get the idea that the US is more difficult to gain citizenship than most countries. Birth right citizenship automatically makes it easier in a lot of situations than many European countries which don't have it to gain citizenship. It is also one of the easiest ways to abuse a regulation with birth tourism or pregnancy in people who are not here legitimately themselves.

To some degree, but the root cause is corruption. If nothing is amiss, there were probably multiple other avenues to this same point that were ignored by the swamp and a media that won't scrutinize democrats. It is not like this is the first time there has been any hint of this. By the time the legally blind repairman hands it to Giuliani on a platter, one has to wonder on how many other fronts the story has been ignored if not outright buried by the powers that be.