5
preferredfault 5 points ago +5 / -0

Hank Hill says yes.

2
preferredfault 2 points ago +2 / -0

The ruble wouldn't be collapsing even if they hadn't gone out of their way to prepare. They just lightened the blow, that wasn't really ever going to be a blow to begin with. Russia's gas dependence, even if Europe stopped buying (which they would never do), will always be a boon for the cost of living in Russia.

Globalists want control of the world, but the world has that little problem of if you're reliant on other countries for shit, you're always going to be negatively effected by what goes on elsewhere. The US used to have this independence, both before WW2, and during Trump.

2
preferredfault 2 points ago +2 / -0

Democrats are paying billions of dollars....for a propaganda talking point. They're morons.

13
preferredfault 13 points ago +14 / -1

They're trying to make it look like Russia is broke or refusing to pay its debts, but they're just refusing to accept payments from Russia.....which doesn't actually mean they're defaulting....and also doesn't actually hurt Russia. Just like when all the fast food franchises abandoned Russia....only for Russia to take ownership of all the properties and make them into new restaurant chains...didn't hurt Russia one bit....gave Russia billions of dollars in free assets, assets it will likely never give back. If McDonalds wants to do business in Russia again, it's likely going to cost them billions of dollars to buy their way back in.

4
preferredfault 4 points ago +4 / -0

This. Ken Starr had stumbled into what they were really trying to hide, which was a shot ton of treasonous corruption against the citizens of the United States, that would have had people across the nation calling for Bill's head. But Ken's goal was impeachment, and they dangled Monica in front of him as a distraction, so he ignored everything else and went for the low hanging fruit.

1
preferredfault 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's really odd, because he put extra kill shots in everyone....except the black woman he shot in the butt/legs when entering the store. And she was audibly grunting. So I don't get why he didn't finish her too if it was truly a purely racist targeting.

The whole thing is odd, and certainly doesn't scream racist conservative on a killing spree at all. If it was real and not some crisis actor stuff (that guy at the trunk of the car hitting the ground like he was shot too early is sus, it looks like he was accidentally playing dead too early), but if it was real, it seems like the guy was a mentally ill lefty, and potentially even being guided by leftist political agency operations in order to lead him to do these things.

Just like how the Australian fires were started by environmentalists. They idiotically think they have to do the evil things in order to get the policies they want against the evil things they do. So for years, you get Democrats crying about conservative extremism that doesn't even exist at all, then you get Democrats committing crimes in order to paint it as conservatives, in order to try to villainize the people who aren't doing the things they themselves are doing.

It's always pretty convenient that Democrats make everything bad that happens into conservative extremism.

1
preferredfault 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ask George Zimmerman if he was "latin" when he was being falsely charged for defending his own life. Latin is the new white. In fact, if it wasn't for hispanic people being considered as white by virtually all documents of identification, the statistics would show that whites have been a minority for MUCH longer than people think. They keep saying whites will be a minority, but they already are. It's just you have a lot of hispanic people labeled as white, and not even just the whiter looking hispanic people, but clearly non white people having white on their drivers license. Why do they do this? So they can keep the lie going that whites are an evil majority and we need more "inclusion". There are many cities in America that are deemed white majority still, but are actually mostly black and hispanic.

16
preferredfault 16 points ago +16 / -0

Its always been about encroaching on states with election fraud and make them considered as blue states. Biden lost even major blue states in this election. They had to cheat in their own strongholds. And the reality is they've ALWAYS cheated, that's how they became strongholds in the first place. There hasn't been an honest election in a blue state for over 100 years. That's why they've held on to these states for soo long, despite systematically lowering the quality of life.

8
preferredfault 8 points ago +8 / -0

If they were really even in the slightest bit serious, there would be a 6pm curfew at the latest, and probably closer to a 4pm curfew.

1
preferredfault 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yep. There's enough oil in the ground around the world to power humanity for 100,000 years or more. It's everywhere plants grew, and plants have covered the earth forever. It's merely a matter of drilling depth. There's enough marble in the ground that we could rebuild every human structure out of it and still have a ton of it leftover. We're running out of literally nothing. There is an abundance of resources, and we're basically being force to sip from an eyedropper. And the worst part? They can't take it with them! So hoarding it is stupid. The only reason why it's done the way it is, is for power. That's why they want to make steak expensive....because then it becomes something only the elites can afford and have. The ultimate reason is they can't enjoy something unless it's something only they have access to, no matter how abundant it could be.

3
preferredfault 3 points ago +3 / -0

Has Ukraine sold off any of its own assets to cover its own expenses? This is all literally just Democrats Ukraine money theft scheme on steroids.

1
preferredfault 1 point ago +1 / -0

That is quite literally enough money to completely feed every American born for the first 2 years of their life, and then some.

1
preferredfault 1 point ago +1 / -0

The real question is, WHY are they even allowed to geo track people.

4
preferredfault 4 points ago +4 / -0

I don't think it's soo much a woke purge, but rather, since Democrats have figured out how to completely steal elections on a national level, they no longer really need some of their propaganda arms, thus the funding gets cut. Used and left for dead, they destroyed their own company. Just like how Obama bankrupted the DNC in the process of stealing his election. Democrats only use institutions and businesses until they've gotten what they wanted out of it, then they bail and leave them to bleed out from the damage they've done.

Netflix has been running a lot of FAKE accounts since all the anti-white and pedo stuff, to cover up the exodus. They thought they could contain the trend by trying to mask the trend, because if everyone hears X millions left Netflix, even more would follow because people would think "Hmm...should I be leaving too?".

So they've been running fake accounts to keep their subscriber numbers up, with money being funneled in from somewhere to make those fake accounts look real to reflect in their income/stock value. But now the jig is up and they can no longer prop up those fake numbers.

All one has to ask is where the funding for all those anti white and pedo movies came from. And I'd say the answer is from the US taxpayer, funneled in through various means by Democrats and other globalists working with them. Netflix has essentially proven that it would make and host any movie that an outside party was willing to fund. No different than how fake news pays people to write propaganda articles, and again, at the cost of the US taxpayer, as we saw that Obama gave them hundreds of millions of dollars on his way out, and then when that money started running dry, one by one they started shuttering or scaling back.

CNN is still their biggest operation right now though. If you look at their viewership numbers, there's no way that advertising is bringing in enough money to pay for even a fraction of their operating costs. There's small time youtubers with bigger audiences, and they don't run big ass studios with professional equipment and dozens of high paid anchors. Even most of CNN's youtube videos are in the sub 100K view count, and topping out at less than 2 million views in some. You know how much 2 million views pays on youtube? Like $10k. That's tiny in comparison to the costs of running a full studio set with anchors, staff, camera men, editors, offices, etc. That's buys probably less than a second of what the operating costs would be. It's clear that CNN is being propped up by taxpayer dollars through secret programs, just like Netflix.

The only difference is, they could make all the Netflix movies they want, but if no one is watching them to be propagandized by them, then they're pointless. And that's why the plug was pulled on Netflix. People shunned Netflix to such a degree that even their Democrat handlers pulled out because of the damage.

1
preferredfault 1 point ago +1 / -0

Honestly, I don't think he's really a redpiller anymore. In the beginning he was, but he lost his liberal audience a long time ago. His audience is pretty much purely conservatives now, and people only really watch him to watch him shit on the left. He also still says stupid lefty shit from time to time.

6
preferredfault 6 points ago +6 / -0

This. They're trying to determine the extent of vax injury, without saying they're trying to determine the extent of vax injury, because they don't want to admit that there's vax injury, and it's obviously a national security issue, so they're not going to outright admit that they basically crippled America's military with an emergency authorized vax they rushed into use in the name of bad politics that they never even had any business being involved in. Our military leadership should be apolitical, and protect us from political domestic threats....except they took the wrong side because it's the Democrats that are the domestic threat.

0
preferredfault 0 points ago +1 / -1

"First of all not a single baby has been murdered so you can stop saying that. That is you’re perception but not the perception of most Americans. There is no logical basis for claiming that. "

If you believe that, your belief is just a product of Democrat manipulation. Perception doesn't have anything to do with it. Murder is murder, and Democrats normalized it for generations by shoving Roe V. Wade down the country's throat. They convinced people murder isn't murder, and that leads nowhere good. Eventually it leads to where murdering even adult humans is no longer seen as murder, if they don't share the same political ideology.

"I also rather a young girl be allowed to make the choice, not the government"

Allowing abortion is government making a choice. By giving rights a person doesn't and shouldn't have, because it takes away the rights of another person to live, is inherently wrong. Again, that type of logic can evolve into more things, and it indeed has, with abortions even being allowed all the way up to the day of birth, and given enough time, that affects society in ways that lead to the lessening of the respect and value of life, even without realizing how far they've been pulled by it. Your beliefs are a prime example of that, but not the culmination of that. As generations go on, it will get worse and worse.

"god isn’t real and I don’t believe religion should have any bearing on policy in anything"

This has nothing to do with god nor religion.

"I don’t want babies being born into broken situations or overflowing orphanages which they invariable will be"

So because someone might be born into a bad situation, you think people should have the right to deny them the right to live? Can't you see it? You're basically saying if someone is going to have some strife in their life, that they don't deserve to exist at all and to be aborted....or deserve to be able to take others lives by aborting them. Can't you see where that leads? The final form of liberalism is totalitarianism. The final form of abortion is state sanctioned genocide, and not just of aborted babies. We're looking at a very dark dystopia if human civilization continues to evolve with these policies.

The fact is, abortion has been normalized, but lots of things that were bad for societies have been normalized in the past and the course changed. You would likely think very differently about abortion today had it never been shoved down our throats through Roe V. Wade. Civilization can normalize anything. Sacrificing people for crops and gods on an alter used to be normalized. Normalized things aren't inherently good.

I can make some compromises for at very early stages, but the problem with that is they will never compromise, they will always push further and further, as we've seen them extend abortion all the way to birth. So it creeps from "OK, 1 month. OK, 3 months. Eh, why not 9 months?". And that leads to "Eh, we terminate undesirable babies at 9 months, why not beyond birth?". It's not as big of a leap as it might seem. It doesn't happen overnight, it doesn't happen over a decade, but it will eventually happen. The value of life becomes cheaper and cheaper.

Think about this: A minor inconvenience of using contraceptives or taking personal responsibility and self control are more inconveniencing to them than TAKING ANOTHERS LIFE. That by proxy makes taking another's life into a granted convenience. When murder becomes normalized, and even not seen as murder, for the sake of convenience, for the sake of avoiding responsibility for ones own actions, imagine where society engrained with such a concept will develop into. We've actually already seen part of the consequences of that, we're living in it, and those consequences will continue to increase as time goes on.

Society today would be very different if Roe V. Wade was never forced down our throats. More regard for personal responsibility. More US citizens that share American values. Even immigration policy would be affected if Roe V. Wade was never forced on us. And much much more. Roe V. Wade has had a greater effect on the world we live in than you realize, and virtually none of it good, especially on balance.

1
preferredfault 1 point ago +1 / -0

It may be unfortunate, but so is a 10yo in the ghetto running around with a gun shooting people. Both are ignorant, both are committing murder. Also I would say there's an argument to be made that the people performing the abortion would be even more culpable. With them getting arrested left and right, or find themselves wanted in other states, the abortion profession would quickly dwindle even in blue states. They don't want to be driving or flying through Texas, only to be arrested for an abortion they performed on someone who flew to their state to get one at some point.

So really, you'd end up with a relatively small number of people getting punished before abortions become too legally risky of a profession. As more and more abortion doctors are arrested and imprisoned, more and more clinics will close, and at that point they won't even have the capacity. The backlog will be soo high, that most women won't even be able to get in before they're giving birth. They'll have to turn away 9 in 10 people seeking abortions, they'll have to run lotteries, and at that point people will start seeking abortion less and less, until it's effectively eradicated.

So no, it won't be millions of young girls ending up in prison. There's more people getting abortions, than there are abortion doctors. Once you burn through the doctors, there's no one left to perform abortions. It solves itself rather simply.

10's of millions of babies have been murdered....a few thousand people in prison in order to stop that, is on balance, far more moral. 10,000 teens in prison or 100,000,000 babies killed. Both aren't great prospects, but one sure as heck tips the scales more.

2
preferredfault 2 points ago +2 / -0

Too extreme?! Forcing it as national law through a SCOTUS ruling was what was really extreme. They need to take this shit and run with it while they can, otherwise Democrats will just normalize it back into existence as if the SCOTUS ruling never changed a thing, getting their way anyways, and making the overturning of Roe v Wade pointless. They need to hit hard on this. Treat abortion as murder, prosecute and imprison all those involved. Make it an uphill battle for Democrats. Make them go to court and argue why a persons prison sentence should be commuted for the murder of a baby by committing the crime of abortion. Make them try to argue that it wasn't taking another's life. Make them run through all the logic.

That's why Roe V Wade was soo egregious, it had no real debate, it was just pushed through by SCOTUS decree. They did that explicitly to avoid debate, because they knew they couldn't get around the simple logic of it being murder.

1
preferredfault 1 point ago +1 / -0

Technically, ALL abortion is homicide now. There are no laws legalizing it, it is the taking of a life, therefore it falls under the standard definition of murder. Democrats are quietly hoping no one realizes that fact and that no one does anything about it, but where it needs to start is would be fathers reporting women for getting an abortion, as a crime. The police will have no choice but to handle the situation and make a determination, and that opens them up to liability if they don't act.

3
preferredfault 3 points ago +3 / -0

But nothing will top when Don Cheadle found out his ancestors were owned by indians lol.

3
preferredfault 3 points ago +3 / -0

She mentions it because they're trying to get ahead of it. It's not just incestuous, it's unethical.

8
preferredfault 8 points ago +8 / -0

Oh no, now they have someone to take care of them when they're elderly, what a shame!

view more: Next ›