2
preferredfault 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is a perfect visual example of the absurdity of socialism/liberalism.

That one girl talking to that guy is basically the same height as him before the lifts, but they're both wearing lifts anyways. And why is that tall guy on the right wearing lifts at all? Is he not the benchmark for the height limit?!

Trying to create equality of outcome means you need to pump more into one person than another, and generally more into most people in order to reach the same outcome. Everyone gets lifted up...but some get less than others....which is technically not equality at all.

This is also a perfect example of how socialism doesn't make people equally rich, it makes people equally poor and unequally disadvantaged. These people with the lifts, the bigger they get, the more handicapped they become at excelling on their own, literally weighed down at their feet. Who can run faster? The guy with the least amount of lifts....and that's exactly how it would work in the real world. Except if liberals had their way, they would just merely make it illegal to run at a certain speed for the guy with the least amount of lifts. Which just further illustrates the absurdity of socialism/liberalism.

All universities seem to do these days is make dumb people think they're smart.

1
preferredfault 1 point ago +1 / -0

Even if an asteroid hits earth and wiped out mostly everything, it would still make more sense to wait in orbit and re-colonize earth than to colonize mars. You'd be able to put way more people in orbit than on mars. Even if there was a mars colony and the earth was hit by an asteroid, going back to earth after X number of years or centuries would still be better in the long run than trying to establish a permanent new home on mars. That's what these mars colonization dreams fail to realize....earth will always be the best candidate.

Just imagine you're on mars and earth is hit and X amount of time passes and the dust starts to settle. Even if the atmosphere is toxic, as long as the oceans haven't boiled away, that one sole reason alone would be enough to go back to re-colonize earth. Not to mention the gravity. Live in habitats on a desert wasteland with low gravity....or live in habitats on a toxic atmosphere earth with readily available water and other resources (that may eventually recover on its own) that is the right distance from the sun for liquid water with a thick enough atmosphere that you would only need breathers and not pressure suits. It's a no brainer!

1
preferredfault 1 point ago +1 / -0

They want the nuclear football so they can sell it to China to reverse engineer so that our whole offensive nuclear infrastructure is compromised. Change my mind.

11
preferredfault 11 points ago +11 / -0

And it's not like they can move on, which is the worst part. There's only about 1 man for every 1 woman. While some people can remarry, the vast majority won't be able to because there realistically isn't a million fish in the sea like people say. So they've destroyed relationships for a species that has almost an even 50/50 ratio in gender, which can only lead to nothing but loneliness. If liberals ruled over the entire species, our species would mathematically be doomed on their political divisiveness alone.

2
preferredfault 2 points ago +2 / -0

A colony on mars will never be entirely self sustainable, at least not for centuries. So they will always rely on some resource from earth, even if it's just replacement computer chips or upgrades and new hardware. As they expand, they'll also want more things, like more types of seeds, other equipment, etc. And that's not even counting the amount of people they would need for a true colony, which would take tens of thousands of people to have a successful breeding population that doesn't end up inbred. And that's even if people can be born on mars due to the low gravity or some other issue. If that's a limiting factor, then a mars base will never be anything but a glorified space hotel / research outpost.

1
preferredfault 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, sadly it seems from Elon's perspective, this is all only a temporary crazy place he has to deal with. He already said he wants to die on mars. Or in other words, his resources aren't for this earth, he's saving them for his trip to mars. He's all in on that dream. The problem is, in order to have a sustained colony on mars, you need to have shit on earth to not be soo volatile, otherwise the whole colony dream collapses if America turns full third world or becomes soo weakened that its enemies decide it wants a WWIII. Then all Elon will be able to do is watch the colony he built die....then he'll be remembered as a man who died on mars with his dream, rather than the man who died living his dream.

8
preferredfault 8 points ago +8 / -0

Honestly, they really have no choice but to defy him. The law demands it. And if Biden got his way, their jobs would become soo useless they would end up losing them. These people have pensions and other benefits on the line. They're not in their jobs because it's a summer or holiday job. They're in them because that's their career. So when Biden comes along and threatens that, you damn well better believe people in these jobs are going to fight, because that's their livelihood. But people like Joe don't understand that shit, because Joe has never worked a real job in his life.

9
preferredfault 9 points ago +10 / -1

Ask yourself, is the power that Americans need to heat their homes to keep from freezing to death, ever really "excess power"?

6
preferredfault 6 points ago +6 / -0

Meanwhile every liberal blindly trying to bash Texas says this is not the case, that Texas simply wasn't winterized properly and that Texas's non-federally run power plants simply cut corners and somehow aren't even subject to federal regulations.

It was all clearly a coordinated political attack on Ted Cruz, despite the fact that he wasn't even the guy in charge of these things. Governors are the ones to handle these things, not Senators. I mean shit, all you need to do is look at who has been running the lockdowns to know who is in charge of these things for states...It's governors! I haven't heard any news stories like "Senator issues lockdown orders", because that's not what Senators do!

These people turn blood thirsty over everything because they have no fucking idea or respect for how our system of government is supposed to work, that they'll get riled up at a Senator going on vacation for not handling a crisis that isn't even their job!

2
preferredfault 2 points ago +2 / -0

The US is even cleaner than people realize, we've massively surpassed even the Paris Accords in efficiency. The problem is, the Paris Accords just says "Reduce your carbon footprint regardless of any other factor!". But we've actually reduced it massively lower than it would have otherwise been, naturally.

For example, a computer from the 90's used about as much power as a computer does today. Yet computers are dozen's if not hundreds of times faster for the same power usage. Not to mention mobile devices that use even less power. If we made no advancements in efficiency, we'd be using hundreds of times more power to do the same things.

LED light bulbs can use 5-10x less power. More efficient production has reduced energy usage too.

The Paris Accords are a malicious joke against America. They only exist to stifle America, because the less resources America uses, the more resources available for China, and cheaper. This adds up to trillions of dollars in savings for China alone....so it's easy to see why they would do it. They want resources and they want it cheaper, and the only way to get it cheaper is to increase supply by decreasing other countries usage.

14
preferredfault 14 points ago +14 / -0

Black owned means 200% markup, just 'cause. Even black people avoid those stores. Then they get aid from the government to stay open. I've been seeing all kinds of places like minority owned restaurants getting "corona funds" to help them stay open even though they were struggling even before the lock downs because their restaurants suck, while the white owned restaurant across the street gets jack squat even though they were actually popular because they had good food at good prices.

19
preferredfault 19 points ago +19 / -0

Climate change is real. It's just that it's a natural occurrence. If we went by liberal logic, the planet should somehow stay the same climate forever, even though it's clear that the planet has never had a static climate.

The worst part is that if our emissions are causing any meaningful warming, that would actually be a good thing, because it will offset the upcoming ice age. And an ice age is definitely less conducive to life on earth than hot days. We can survive and thrive on a hot world....we cannot survive nor thrive in a frozen world.

19
preferredfault 19 points ago +19 / -0

Basically what they've been doing is the equivalent to if they rounded up a bunch of citizens and had them executed in the name of medical science. Except they do it to babies and promote the very thing that causes people to give them those babies. It's an intrinsic level of evil.

Other than some medical issue or fetus issue, there is no reason to support abortion other than to want the byproducts of abortion. We hear it all the time "Gotta import immigrants! Our population isn't rising enough!"....while at the same time telling us we need population control because the population causes global warming.

And with these artificial lockdowns, suddenly, "my body my choice" disappeared. How about that. Maybe it really wasn't about "my body my choice". Maybe it was about a massive industrial complex that needed lots and lots of human body parts for their research, and wanted it soo badly, they promoted mass murder under the guise of abortion, while painting it to not look like mass murder.

8
preferredfault 8 points ago +8 / -0

Not to mention that in DC, it's actually a hate crime to target people for their political beliefs. What Pelosi is openly doing is committing a hate crime in the only place in America where it's actually illegal.

15
preferredfault 15 points ago +15 / -0

What they were really trying to cover up is the fact that Pelosi orchestrated the violence on Jan 6th. She blocked Trump from sending more security in, had the capitol police invite people in, then told the capitol police it was an insurrection and to behave as such. Then the capitol police started attacking MAGA people, which prompted them to defend themselves, then it became a mini riot. It was all an orchestrated trap by Pelosi.

That's why as soon as Trump's lawyer talked about bringing up Pelosi as a witness, they quickly moved to have the final vote, instead of dragging things on. They didn't want Pelosi being exposed, because if the lawyers had gotten her deposition, they would have had everything they needed to show on the Senate floor that Pelosi was the one who actually committed what they were impeaching Trump for.

They would have interviews of the capitol police, and found that Pelosi blocked having more security, that Pelosi gave the order to allow the people in, and to have MAGA people attacked after having let them in. The whole thing was a reverse trojan horse. They allow protestors in, then act like the protestors were violent, thereby creating violence when the protestors defend themselves and get riled up from being treated that way.

Just look at the shots the press got. Does anyone think they just happened to have people in all the right places to capture it? It's just like what CNN did with Roger Stones raid. Even the filming of it was clearly orchestrated, like they had a Hollywood movie set prepped for filming. When you see that cop getting chased up the stairs, there's a person filming him the whole time, on the opposite side of the cop from the protestors.

And that definitely wasn't a smartphone quality video. Same with the people busting some doors. Full professional gear camera crew 2ft from people busting doors in a narrow cramped hallway, with just the right focal length lens for that distance!

This is what they are trying to hide, and exactly why they didn't want Trump to have witness depositions and why they didn't do any basic procedures or investigations in the house before sending impeachment over. They knew it would all point to Pelosi the moment Trump's lawyers were allowed to interview people to take depositions.

5
preferredfault 5 points ago +5 / -0

He stuck behind Trump for 4 years....but then in the last moment, betrayed him when it mattered most. That's how you separate true friends from tourists.

4
preferredfault 4 points ago +4 / -0

"That is why he must be convicted and acquitted.........I mean disqualified!"

Just making fools of themselves and a mockery of America in front of the whole world.

8
preferredfault 8 points ago +8 / -0

"he told the proud boys to standby".

ROFL. Standby is literally the opposite of attack. And she's leaving out the fact that the proud boys were fighting in self defense after having been attacked.

8
preferredfault 8 points ago +8 / -0

"yes he has encouraged actual violence"

...without giving one single example.

7
preferredfault 7 points ago +7 / -0

"he lost 60 something cases"

Lies. Those were cases not brought by the Trump campaign. Not a SINGLE case has been heard for the Trump campaign.

16
preferredfault 16 points ago +16 / -0

"he told the people the election was stolen, that's a combustible situation".

Oh you mean like what Democrats did for the last 4 years with the proven false Russian collusion?! They've basically admitted that they are complicit in all of the rioting for the last year, all of the attacks on Trump supporters, and more.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›