you're thinking about this all wrong. the left has done this many times. i sometimes call it the "disappearing carrot on the stick" trick: promise "ok so we're cool with this; we just want voter id. let's work together to make life more secure for everyone- especially after what russia did a few years ago" and tweet out #BLM randomly until you've earned enough trust to convincingly claim that you've "changed [your] dastardly ways" say that it's way easier to pass this thing, #makeamericamexicoagain, et cetera.. and then "whoops, sorry, we can't figure out a secure and standardized way to check vaccination records without massive HIPAA violations. we'll keep working on it, though
obama already admitted it. what's to investigate? and what's the goal? in my view, obama wasn't nearly the menace the sycophantic legacy media was in turning every day into the equivalent of a weatherman telling you that "the forecast tomorrow is more tickle fights and kitten whispers"
yeah- the left is gonna lose their shit any way/at whatever speed the shit hits the proverbial fan. i think it'd be more of a state-by-state "martial law" scenario until it was a full-on, countrywide civil conflict or whatever you want to call it- where people are driving state to state to go stack bodies somewhere else
trump has the support; for sure. reforming the RNC seems less worth the headache with each passing election ngl. again- we're open to it for sure, and we're definitely not alone
optically, i absolutely agree. but the thing with that is- the left can read a story about an illegal entrant raping and killing people and turn right around and talk about how illegal immigration is a net benefit. gun-free zones. "science" vs. gender activism. the list goes on and on. the "middle" might see it and scratch their head a little bit, but leftist media will screech harder than they ever have, and i don't know where we'd go from there. they've basically been turned up to 11 since he came down that escalator with melania and delivered his first campaign speech
"irrefutable" is one of those words where there aren't really gradations; it's a binary thing
how can something become more irrefutable, if you don't mind my asking? "the closer to irrefutable this small mountain of evidence becomes"? "the more difficult it is for the left to seriously challenge it"? i mean- it kind of reminds me of what the left did with all those women who totally credibly accused trump of sexual misconduct. it's, i guess, what we could call an "evidence bomb." sort through it. find, arrest, enforce, charge, and sentence for the big stuff which can be proven in a court of law. we can talk about the smaller stuff later once the big fish are taken care of
"hey- let's bring in a bunch of brand new senators who will have very little at their disposal in terms of fighting/stopping the worst excesses of democrats in the senate"
good.. um, well, i mean, good luck with that
this is almost as bad as sidney powell and lin wood arguing not to vote/to vote for or write in someone else in GA's election
why? just why? dennis prager often uses this little parable to describe the left: when a leftist encounters a fence, they call for it to be torn down. when a conservative sees a fence, they ask 'why is it here in the first place' and might discuss it further." i say that the same applies to systems- and, specifically, political systems. "why is mcconnell here? of what benefit is he? and the others?" should be asked first before saying simply "FRESH BLOOD FRESH BLOOD FUCK THESE PEOPLE"
this is foolish, trolling, or simply disingenuous. please reconsider
let's say PA isn't enough. that's 284
now let's say WI or AZ fail as well. that brings us down to 273 or 274
not sure why ME d2 is toss-up/tilt, but that's pretty inconsequential. that's actually quite narrow, since all it would take is a small handful of faithless electors to deny trump from getting to 270- in which case it'd go to the house, and each state (and presumably DC) would get precisely 1 vote. that would be 27 to 24 or 26 to 25 in the scenarios described above--assuming state legislatures choose someone who will vote as their state did rather than the comprisal of their state house+senate.
now that's when shit would really hit the fan, theoretically, because democrats would claim that the election was absolutely stolen and that republicans had stolen back the house et cetera. i mean- we can only go on for so much longer before we have bullets flying in both directions in towns and on streets across the US. i'm getting to the point where i legitimately believe that the sooner it happens, the better- because every day that passes where we don't have a major civil conflict, the more "powder" is fed into the "keg" so to speak. if the left sincerely believes that they could win that way, well, i guess it's never too late to invite them to try
a couple have a similar facial structure to obama
weird; i wonder if kenya and somalia are in the same haplogroup, similar to japan-korea (but don't tell that to koreans or japanese people; they'll get super pissed)
closest i could find says "mmmmaybe yes. inconclusive"
ninja e: if it's correct, it'd be E1b1b1a1a1b1-CTS3282 or FGC14377
i mean- it's already sunday gunday, if you're going by time in japan; but they have more or less mandatory vaccines
so fuck that noise