4
qingchangchong 4 points ago +4 / -0

Also, I wouldn't put some type of faux assassination attempt outside of their realm. They'll use staged assassination attempts as reason for revolt. Be aware.

2
qingchangchong 2 points ago +2 / -0

exactly. i would review anywhere he didn't atleast the same vote count. there's possible legitimate reasons as to why and they would/should be very apparent. otherwise, i would suspect chicanery at its finest.

by Alpha
1
qingchangchong 1 point ago +1 / -0

i won't accept a pine box

6
qingchangchong 6 points ago +7 / -1

data gurus, i have a question:

how many counties US wide had a decline in Trump votes?

is anyone able to help me out?

3
qingchangchong 3 points ago +3 / -0

Long, long time nascar fan. I defended the sport unconditionally since I can remember. They'll never do enough to get me to come back. Good riddance. It's not hard to find better racing without the bullshit.

4
qingchangchong 4 points ago +4 / -0

8 weeks and counting on getting my FOID card issued. This cannot be constitutional.

1
qingchangchong 1 point ago +1 / -0

I see this as nothing more than SCOTUS providing a clear antithesis example that directly opposes the actions of china ccp.

There should no longer be a person on God's green Earth that can even make a comparison that the US is more oppressive/tyrannical than the ccp.

4
qingchangchong 4 points ago +4 / -0

https://revisor.mo.gov/main/OneSection.aspx?section=563.031

Subsection 2, part 3: "Such force is used against a person who unlawfully enters, remains after unlawfully entering, or attempts to unlawfully enter private property that is owned or leased by an individual, or is occupied by an individual who has been given specific authority by the property owner to occupy the property, claiming a justification of using protective force under this section."

3
qingchangchong 3 points ago +3 / -0

I think if they mentioned the claims to be "unsubstantiated" one more time, I might have believed them😂

5
qingchangchong 5 points ago +5 / -0

How do you make a 2 year investigation of an individual based upon a farce and NOT start it with political bias?

I'm watching the spin of this story on the news right now and I'm flabbergasted. It's like watching state "sponsored" communist drivel. Unbelievable.