Here's a fellow patriot live stream: https://www.twitch.tv/brantforliberty
It happened again: https://media.thedonald.win/post/wbQ9cxrL.jpeg
Fake news.
A Grassley spokesman clarifies that the senator does not "have any indication Pence won't be present." Grassley, he said, was just trying to explain that as president pro tempore of the Senate, he would fill the chair if Pence does not show or steps out at points for a break.
From a GA judge's Opinion 3 months ago:
"recognizing the capacity for the unobserved injection of malware into computer systems to circumvent and access key codes and hash values to generate fraudulent codes and data. these risk issues are in play in the operation of Dominion’s Democracy Suite 5.5-A GA": https://bradblog.com/Docs/CurlingOpinion_GA-BMDs_101120.pdf
Trump didn't lose.
But you know that.
More interesting: Their banner says "NEW YEAR, New Look, 1/4/2021"
I step closer to being Soylent Green.
Not really. Same MO: Allegations of fraud in South Korean elections called warning on new voting technologies 5/8/2020 Particular attention was paid to “a new field of digital fraud involving vote counting machines, computer hardware and software, and Huawei information network telecommunications equipment,” Tara O noted in a May 8 analysis for East Asia Research Center.
I'm a certified genealogist with the DAR. I researched Brad's line back to his great grandfather, Clayton Raffensberger, born in 1868 PA. There are NO Ronalds in his line.
This guy is lying. Just 2 months ago he was involved in a lawsuit where Judge Totenberg affirmed: "recognizing the capacity for the unobserved injection of malware into computer systems to circumvent and access key codes and hash values to generate fraudulent codes and data. these risk issues are in play in the operation of Dominion’s Democracy Suite 5.5-A GA"
This story is wrong - they aren't related. I notified Gateway a few hours ago.
Under the US Constitution, governors generally have the authority to maintain order within state borders. This principle is reflected in a law called the Posse Comitatus Act, which generally bars the federal military from participating in domestic law enforcement.
The Insurrection Act, which was signed into law by Thomas Jefferson in 1807, creates an exception to the Posse Comitatus Act. It permits the president to send in US forces to suppress a domestic insurrection that has hindered the normal enforcement of US law but only at the explicit request of a state governor. If invoked, the Insurrection Act allows the president to deploy "land or naval forces of the U.S." ... "to suppress [an] insurrection" or rebellion.
The law lays out a scenarios in which the president is required to have approval from a state's governor or legislature - and also instances where such approval is not necessary.
You're wrong, of course. the Insurrection Act, which allows the use of active-duty or National Guard troops for federal law enforcement in cases when “rebellion against the authority of the U.S. makes it impracticable to enforce the laws of the U.S. by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings,” according to U.S. Northern Command.
Martial Law is not the same as invoking the Insurrection Act: the Insurrection Act, which allows the use of active-duty or National Guard troops for federal law enforcement in cases when “rebellion against the authority of the U.S. makes it impracticable to enforce the laws of the U.S. by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings,” according to U.S. Northern Command.
Yes. And one option is for the disputed states' electoral votes to be thrown out so that nobody gets to 270.
Where are you starting from? What plans have you made?
I stood on a street corner in a small Texas town with 5 other patriots with a "stop the steal" sign. We got mostly thumbs up and someone even handed us $10 for beer.
Read the AZ Bill: https://www.azleg.gov/legtext/55leg/1R/bills/SCR1002P.htm