5
RageBringer 5 points ago +5 / -0

Chubs McRib in the white shirt blasting pepper spray on everybody

3
RageBringer 3 points ago +3 / -0

Shame is not present in the liberal mind, neither is common sense. I honestly believe it to be a GENETIC defect that only an mRNA based injection could ever hope to cure... I just wish we had some mRNA based injection laying around that was coded and developed under the guise of something else, in an operation of FAST MOVEMENT or something similar.

1
RageBringer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Is this tweet from the future?

2
RageBringer 2 points ago +2 / -0

The DOMINION started in 2018 with all this bullshit, which is why this witch of a judge knows what is going to happen to her when he learn ALL THE TRUTH.

16
RageBringer 16 points ago +16 / -0

Then she said, 'Trump supporters want the court to overturn the election to keep their KING in power".... dumb cunt. Least she acknowledges him as Emperor though.

5
RageBringer 5 points ago +5 / -0

CLIP the part where Judge Karofsky yelled, "AMERICA IS NOT SELF GOVERNED"!!!

11
RageBringer 11 points ago +11 / -0

Light up Jill Karofsky's facebook page, she is bleeding blue

7
RageBringer 7 points ago +7 / -0

Somoene punch that John Devaney fucktard when he walks out of the court

3
RageBringer 3 points ago +4 / -1

TheDonald.win homebrew autist mathematician team from hell

0
RageBringer 0 points ago +8 / -8

LOL, you're lookin at it, don't expect you to understand by just looking. The math genius had to get some sleep, and so am I. Know we got them guys, its over. We'll knock out MI and WI next, then go after CA/NY

2
RageBringer 2 points ago +3 / -1

PA wheel number (blue), verification number (yellow), and 0(green) deviations verified.

No more accusations, now we have PROOF, undeniable. Dominion Algorithm reversed.

3
RageBringer 3 points ago +9 / -6

If you were told, it was too soon to use SCOTUS, and the Justices are all on board?

2
RageBringer 2 points ago +3 / -1

LOL, dude you cannot "appeal" a SCOTUS opinion or decision. There is no higher court.

2
RageBringer 2 points ago +2 / -0

No it is not, it is time to continue to rally allies, sway those in the middle, educate the ignorant. The fewer the innocent casualties the bigger our win.

10
RageBringer 10 points ago +10 / -0

There will be no secession. We OWN this entire nation, every state is RED. There are only BLUE DOMINION Cities and a few Liberal Swamps. We cordon off these cities, roadblock them, allow conservatives OUT and help them resettle in safe regions. We offer amnesty to liberals who are willing to convert and be divested into areas where they will be re-educated.

55
RageBringer 55 points ago +57 / -2

TEXAS case provided BONUS INTEL on:

  1. Who stood WITH the Patriots and Constitution. (Allies)
  2. Who was expected to stand with us, yet they did NOT. (Not our allies)
  3. Who stood AGAINST the Patriots and Constitution. (Traitors)
  4. Who OPENLY abandoned the Constitution by siding with Traitors? (Betrayers)

Prior to the TEXAS case being docketed at SCOTUS, this was all UNKNOWN. We have lost nothing that we had in our playbook (Texas was a side mission), the main quest is and has been our main objective. We will slay the Salty Dragon and get our +5 Longsword of Freedom!

2
RageBringer 2 points ago +2 / -0

TEXAS case provided BONUS INTEL on:

  1. Who stood WITH the Patriots and Constitution. (Allies)
  2. Who was expected to stand with us, yet they did NOT. (Not our allies)
  3. Who stood AGAINST the Patriots and Constitution. (Traitors)
  4. Who OPENLY abandoned the Constitution by siding with Traitors? (Betrayers)

Prior to the TEXAS case being docketed at SCOTUS, this was all UNKNOWN. We have lost nothing that we had in our playbook (Texas was a side mission), the main quest is and has been our main objective. We will slay the Salty Dragon and get our +5 Longsword of Freedom!

4
RageBringer 4 points ago +5 / -1

No. Texas did not have standing, because they have not been harmed YET. The merits of that case were solid and can always be brought up again by a party with MORE STANDING, such as the CANDIDATE. TEXAS was a great measuring stick on who was LOYAL and who were TRAITORS to the Constitution moving forward.

1
RageBringer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Denied on Standing only, the case needs to be resubmitted with a plaintiff that has the most standing.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›