6
ramennov 6 points ago +7 / -1

I provided a photo of Trump with the Clintons. You provided a photo of Wallace with Clooney. From a photo alone, my argument is just as valid as yours. Because you're having to reach outside of the photo to make a case that Trump didn't "hang out" with them, a photo alone doesn't prove what you're suggesting. Even a basic search shows multiple photos of Trump posing with Epstein/Maxwell.

2
ramennov 2 points ago +7 / -5

Trump hung out with Epstein and the Clintons. Does that make him a sexual predator? Let's endeavor to be less mentally lazy than the left.

6
ramennov 6 points ago +7 / -1

Sure, but I'd rather go by their words and actions to determine that. A photo doesn't prove what you're suggesting.

8
ramennov 8 points ago +11 / -3

A photo doesn’t prove bias. I’d rather stick to Wallace’s own words and actions.

1
ramennov 1 point ago +1 / -0

How about this: Joe's reading the answers to the questions through AR contact lenses, and listening to cues through an earpiece on how to respond to Trump, and behavior/posture cues.

1
ramennov 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's less about "too much work" and more about coming up with a platform that offers something the other platforms cannot readily offer while being novel enough to draw crowds.

1
ramennov 1 point ago +1 / -0

I wouldn't bet on Trump Jr. He's good at sarcasm, but he doesn't appear to have the persuasion skills or same insight into humanity as GEOTUS.

3
ramennov 3 points ago +3 / -0

Glad to hear it, but do you happen to have the source?

8
ramennov 8 points ago +8 / -0

"Asked" was The Hill's word. It's not clear from the article how the GOP feels.

6
ramennov 6 points ago +6 / -0

Did we identify the John Roberts from the flight log?

35
ramennov 35 points ago +35 / -0

These are the "new kids on the block".

2
ramennov 2 points ago +2 / -0

Will do. Thanks.

-4
ramennov -4 points ago +12 / -16

I can't say I'm thrilled about this pick, 'pedes. Unless you guys know something I don't.

1
ramennov 1 point ago +1 / -0

Trump said he wasn't planning on it but hopefully that's just smoke.

2
ramennov 2 points ago +3 / -1

Rigging doesn't necessarily mean a guaranteed outcome, at least not to me. Rigging for me meant election meddling.

36
ramennov 36 points ago +36 / -0

No chicks have dicks. Don’t give their side any inch of legitimacy, ‘pede.

16
ramennov 16 points ago +18 / -2

Please pick Lagoa please pick Lagoa please pick Lagoa

1
ramennov 1 point ago +1 / -0

Being lazy (physically and mentally) is definitely a component of it, but even a mentally lazy person can feel compelled to do things out of a need for self-esteem.

7
ramennov 7 points ago +7 / -0

Denver.

90
ramennov 90 points ago +91 / -1

They're liberal because they're unfuckable. The left is for low self-esteem people who don't meet standards of beauty.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›