-9
randomusers239874 -9 points ago +1 / -10

Nope, I just have a background in the hard sciences, and understand that people like you don't have the wherewithal to understand what is actually happening. The denial of evolution is a core component of communism; you've been indoctrinated and you don't even know it.

-8
deleted -8 points ago +2 / -10
-8
randomusers239874 -8 points ago +1 / -9

This is literally Marxism; the Bolsheviks did the exact same thing. Your quote gives you away; notice how they say they prosecuted "communists", then gloss over that fact and list a whole bunch of other people? Here's the secret, all those other people they "persecuted", they were also communists and communist sympathizers.

-11
randomusers239874 -11 points ago +2 / -13

Except that presumes that all races are equal, but there are literally no successful black nations. Even former Eastern Bloc nations are better off that every African nation.

-9
randomusers239874 -9 points ago +2 / -11

The average African IQ in the West is 85, and we know (via twin studies) that IQ is at least 60% genetic, and up to 90% genetic. They're weaponizing the fact that Africans just can't compete with whites by blaming racism, but it doesn't change the fact that Africans hated us before then because they couldn't compete.

-2
randomusers239874 -2 points ago +7 / -9

Marxists that infiltrated the US in the 1950s. It stems from the communist denial of evolution, and the focus on society as the primary driver of differences in behavior and outcomes.

-7
randomusers239874 -7 points ago +3 / -10

The SC already ruled that every commercial activity is "interstate commerce", even if it's done entirely within the state, because it could potentially cross state lines.

-7
randomusers239874 -7 points ago +3 / -10

Honestly, the interstate highway system produces much more wealth than the tax money it takes to maintain it. If the government stuck to mega-projects (such as cross-country high speed rail, internet backbones, etc) I don't think anyone would complain. It's getting into every minor state level project that's the problem.

-4
randomusers239874 -4 points ago +5 / -9

And as usual, the truth is a much more boring "none of it is true". It doesn't cure shit, and it doesn't cause mental psychosis. But, it can help alleviate symptoms in certain cases, and can exacerbate a mental illness if you already have one.

-3
randomusers239874 -3 points ago +7 / -10

I do believe that there is strong evidence that weed smoke does not lead to a higher rate of lung cancer. I don't recall the specifics, but IIRC it has to do with the combustion products being different versus modern tobacco. Or course, that data might change now that weed is being more widely used.

-1
randomusers239874 -1 points ago +8 / -9

The interstate commerce decision was the final nail in the coffin for states rights. It basically said that anything that could potentially have anything to do with interstate commerce, even if it hasn't yet, then the federal government can regulate it.

-4
randomusers239874 -4 points ago +5 / -9

"Oh the birth rate has been decimated because responsible people don't have kids when they can't afford them? Better give all those illegals amnesty to replace them!"

-13
randomusers239874 -13 points ago +5 / -18

Studies of historical data have shown that the CPI actually over estimates inflation. And yeah, I do trust it, not because I trust the government, but because all the foreign nations that put trillions into our bonds would be bitching about the rate being inaccurate as their yields would be lower. I trust that people investing billions of dollars would complain if their money was being fucked with.

-6
randomusers239874 -6 points ago +4 / -10

I think that the average person has to be dragged to the truth, kicking and screaming, despite the optics. In fact, I would say there probably has never been any revolution in history that didn't require beating people over the head with truth, because most people just want bread and circuses.

-5
randomusers239874 -5 points ago +4 / -9

True, but one could make the same exact argument about libertarianism, civic nationalists, and free marketers. Those have been practiced here for a long time and we're living through the ultimate result of those policies.

-7
randomusers239874 -7 points ago +1 / -8

No, but they have a higher IQ than the rest of the population. You know what a bell curve is, don't you? Also, you do realize that, even though we have a "diversity lottery" in our immigration system, the only people that are capable of meeting the requirements would be well off in their countries. That's where the selection bias comes in. Farmers in Africa literally have zero chance of being eligible to come here, and wouldn't have the means to even if they did.

-6
randomusers239874 -6 points ago +1 / -7

The people that beg and scrape all day to feed their family already have higher IQs than most. Why do you think fatherlessness us such a problem in that population? It's an effect, not a cause.

-7
randomusers239874 -7 points ago +1 / -8

The reason they aren't releasing it is because it could taint the jury pool, and make the criminal more likely to have a valid appeal asserting he didn't get a fair trial.

-5
randomusers239874 -5 points ago +2 / -7

You'd think that committing 56% of the crime would cause them to be taken off the streets, and that percentage would drop to basically nothing. But we keep letting them go for some reason.

-4
randomusers239874 -4 points ago +3 / -7

Selection bias. The ones that come here are usually well off, meaning they have higher than average IQ. If we were importing them at random, that phenomenon would not exist. Consider this, the average African IQ in the West is 85, whereas the Average IQ in Africa is 65.

-4
randomusers239874 -4 points ago +2 / -6

Civic nationalism in a nut shell.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›