Except that's mathematically provable, but, only rich people need to spend, not the average joe.
"X should be done to that person" <- 100% legal speech
"I'm going to do x to that person" <- an actionable threat, and not protected
Know the difference.
Who said I was for free markets? Interest rates and credit are tools, they do nothing on their own. They can be beneficial, or terrible, depending on how they're wielded, and who wields them. We agree the system is corrupt, that doesn't mean the tools of the system are intrinsically bad. That's the same retarded argument liberals make when they say that guns kill people. No, people kill people, with guns.
Case in point, the Nazis dropped their gold back currency (which was highly inflated) and created a fiat currency pinned to their labor output to get out of their economic depression. And yet, most people bitch about such currency in the US. It's neither good nor bad, they're just tools.
That's fair. I do admit that Hitler technically was a race traitor, but, that doesn't mean they didn't have a lot of good points and policies. I don't support genocide or imperialism, but the fact is that whites and non-whites just don't mesh together that well. Diversity weakens a society.
Well, that is true to a degree, but only when you drink more than your caloric needs. The liver is the only organ that can process sucrose, whereas all organs can process glucose, which is why that happens. But, if you're not eating enough to actually gain weight, the liver will never become fatty as it will never store excess energy.
100% this. Fascism came about to oppose communists. Go look up the original Antifasche Aktion (i.e. Antifa from the 1930s) and see what their political beliefs were.
Nazis were the good guys; the people they were rounding up were mostly communists. You're going to have to become fascist authoritarians if you want to beat these commies, because whether you like it or not, enforced conformity creates stronger groups than individual rights and liberty. They will win because they act as one, with no dissent to detract from their goals.
She wuz a gud girl, she dindu nuttin. She jist tryn to stop da hamburgler, dats all.
Ask a jogger why they did what they did, and you will invariably get the same answer. "I wasn't thinking." Btw, Africans do not have a future tense in their native language, indicating their brains did not evolve in an environment where forward thinking was required for survival. That's one of the reasons they have poor impulse control.
This isn't fascism, it's communism.
Ahh ok, I could be wrong for your situation, as I'm mostly sedentary (desk job and all). Your liver holds around 2000 calories worth of glycogen, which is the main energy source your body uses throughout the day, so exercising a lot in addition to keto could cause that type of brain fog. For a person like me, I'd still have enough glycogen (which is released as glucose) for base brain function, but also get an energy boost from my body having to pull from fat stores to replenish my glycogen. When you eat a lot of carbs, your body refills your glycogen with those sugars before it starts adding to fat, so you never go into ketosis.
I think peanut butter has a huge amount of carbs in it, doesn't it? You should expand out with other animals too, like chicken, eggs, pork (including bacon), and cheese (all fat and protein). I think some hot sauces are low carb too, like sriracha and tabasco, but don't quote me on that.
No, again, you're actually wrong, it actually decreases brain fog. I'm in tech, and my job is 100% pure thinking, and it works great. It's actually high calorie diets and carbs that cause brain fog due to the way we evolved. Tell me, if you're hungry, do you need more or less motivation to go out and do things? Conversely, if you've just had a big meal, do you think it's advantages to go out and do things (which is dangerous in the wild), or better to sit in your safe hiding place and sleep?
This is moronic, and smacks of somebody who has never owned a business. Credit and loans are a way for people with capital to invest it in people/businesses that need capital. There is absolutely nothing wrong with that, and actually is a huge boon for the economy. Do you think the money the banks lend out in businesses loans is just printed? Nope, a very small percentage is, but most is actually rich people investing in various financial vehicles with the bank, which is then lent out to patrons. The problem isn't credit, it's stupid people not understanding compound interest, and getting allocated way more credit than they should. And btw, I'm no fan of Jews, but the right wing "muh usury!" fags are just plain stupid.
I've found that fasting does help, actually. Eat once a day and try to stay in ketosis, and you start feeling pretty good.
Keto is better than vegan, imo. Plus, it's more about how much you eat, rather than what. You can be just healthy drinking just high fructose corn syrup technically, just so long as you don't go over your caloric needs. You might be hungry all the time due to the lack of protein (low satiation response with sugars), but it is possible if you have the will power.
No, that has been the rate since the 1970s, iirc.
I know, I was being generous because of the "Flynn effect". Africans in Africa might have higher IQs if they had better nutrition; but if it were only nutrition being an issue, Africans outside of Africa would have the same mean as Whites and Asians.
Your boomer creationism is dead. The last common ancestor between Whites and Africans was 60,000 years ago; that's a lot of time for divergent brain evolution. Race is real and we are not born equal; we're born with the evolutionary baggage of our ancestors. .
The "conservative message" hinges on creationism, or "blank slate theory" as the liberals call it. The last common ancestor between Africans and Whites was 60,000 years ago; that's a lot of time for divergent brain evolution. People are not born equal, or even with equal potential. We are born with the the evolutionary baggage of our ancestors.
No trolling is happening; your boomer creationism is just dying. The last common ancestor between Africans and Whites was 60,000 years ago; that's a lot of time for divergent brain evolution. In addition, Africans act the same way in ALL other countries and cultures. If a behavior exists cross-culturally, then it has a strong genetic component.
Actually, your view is the Marxist one. Marxists believe in "blank slate" theory, which is a denial of the effect of genes on behavior (and thus a denial of evolution). Libertarianism actually hinges upon that Marxist notion as they consider people to be mostly interchangeable cogs that are a product of their environment. Racism is actually anti-Marxist, as it recognizes that behavior is mostly genetic, and the race of the people you allow into the country does matter. There is a reason the best countries in the world are White and Asian, and why the worst are not, and it's not because of happenstance.
White privilege is real... we have superior genes lol