Also, wouldn't hurt to pardon all the nonviolent patriots who got caught up with the agitators in the capital.
WTF do they expect is going to happen next???
We watched a man beat a mostly rigged system in 2016 to become POTUS. They used their media to vilify him to a degree we’ve never seen; they weaponized all government agencies against him, especially the intelligence agencies. The only mistake they made was failing to rig the ballot box enough to prevent his victory (Hillary would never have conceded and would have demanded an audit if doing so wouldn’t have risked revealing the shenanigans) because they didn’t take into account that all their slander caused people to lie to pollsters. They didn’t make that mistake again in 2020.
The tyrants did that to Trump because he was not just another puppet candidate there to put on a show to make us think we have a say in the system. Trump did not answer to them, so it really pissed them off when their miscalculation allowed him to win. As a result, the tyrants have censored us to a point that this forum is just about the only place left on the internet that I can even say this without being banned. The slander they used before Trump was elected was turned into four years of repetitive brainwashing and projection. They told people Trump was the tyrant because THEY are the tyrants.
Humans have always been plagued by tyrants but this might actually be the final battle. I used to think technology was humanity’s greatest hope; it could have provided everyone with the culmination of all human knowledge at their fingertips (knowledge is power). Now, I see that technology is our greatest threat because tyrants have seized it and are using it to achieve utter control over the masses (both mind and body). Information is now highly controlled, and authoritarian mandates, tracking, and lockdowns are worsening rapidly. Can humanity beat back the tyrants with the kind of tech they control today? It seems we are at a pivotal point in history right now.
Here's what I wrote on popular Q sites at the time:
"I think 'Q' are Deep State operatives who are keeping Trump supporters distracted and placated with fantasies of the swamp being drained and justice being served. Graham has ALWAYS been a pawn of the Deep State & military contractors; he is in on the PSYOP, which is why he asked Kavanaugh those questions about military tribunals. I guarantee Graham knows who the Q people are. The Q deceivers have created a new religious cult of people who won’t tolerate any skepticism. The Deep Staters running the Q operation might actually be revealing a lot of bad things that are true to lure people in, but after Trump is gone, Q will unquestionably be accepted as a total scam and, even if anything the Q people revealed were true, it will also be considered a scam from that point forward. I suggest the faithful Q addicts take a deep breath and come to terms with reality. Believing that nonsense has made far too many of us complacent, which is exactly what they want."
The "Deep State", "Swamp" or whatever else you want to call them have subverted ALL of our institutions. It appears likely they are working with the CCP, but regardless they must be destroyed or all of humanity is doomed to utter authoritarian control and enslavement with technology being what it is today. We must fight them on every single front possible, and that includes pardoning Assange!
Imagine the justice, truth, and liberty we could be enjoying right now if they hadn't kept Trump and the very few trustworthy people around him either ignorant or misled about everything going on and everything they needed to do to ensure justice. The biggest promise Trump has not yet fulfilled was the promise to drain the swamp so power could be restored to the people. We saw that he made a good effort but totally underestimated the swamp at every turn. It's fucking war time whether we avert a Deep State Biden Presidency or not! If Trump gets another term he better go Godzilla mode on the Deep State or all of this will end up being pointless.
Make it a 20 year minimum prison sentence! They will eventually get rid of the EO, but whoever does get rid of it will look like traitorous POS! The NDAA did away with laws that made it illegal to propagandize the American public. We NEED that shit to be illegal again and enforced like they enforce a fucking Covid lockdown!
Obama signed into law the NDAA with provisions to allow the POTUS to indefinitely detain citizens without the right to habeas corpus, and make it legal for the government to use the media to propagandize us. As we have seen, Obama also weaponized all government agencies. I think the puppet masters used Obama to do it because he was not only a criminal like most politicians, but also an intelligent Black man happy to do their bidding, so most people (especially liberals) who were against these authoritarian actions kept their mouths shut due to psychological conditioning regarding race that was designed to ultimately bring down America with irreconcilable racial division and strife. https://commonsenseevaluation.com/2016/11/21/propaganda-on-the-us-public/
I know Trump renewed the NDAA before because he was kept in the dark and betrayed by just about every advisor he hired, but he needs to bite the bullet and just admit that the Deep State successfully infiltrated his administration and worked against him his entire term because he was not their puppet.
I somewhat liken Trump to a trusting Braveheart when he discovered the Scottish nobles betrayed their people. The difference is Braveheart dished out justice to one of the traitors by bashing his head in with a ball-and-chain; whereas our nobles continually betray us to CCP/NWO tyrants and no justice has ever been visited upon them yet.
EVERYTHING we have done is aimed at reducing the spread of droplets, but Covid-19 is AIRBORNE! Droplets do contain Covid, but all those droplets build up in our masks over time and the virus aerosolizes off of them; we are blowing it right through and around all these shitty masks like walking industrial pathogen factories. There is a reason we keep patients with Covid-19 in negative pressure rooms FFS! Wearing a mask that is not a fit-tested N95 or better puts you and EVERYONE within 30 feet of you at HIGHER risk of infection, and the longer you wear it, the higher the risk!
It is the fear of being sued that causes many businesses to require masks to be worn. We need to make it clear to everyone now that we know that wearing masks INCREASES infection rates, and we will sue everyone that requires us to wear masks if we get infected. That is how we will conquer this destructive, authoritarian bullshit!
A nice second bonus is that if Antifa aren't allowed to wear masks, they will go hide under their rocks again just like they did when cities started banning mask wearing before Covid changed everything.
I understand that the CCP has spent many years and a lot of effort into subverting our institutions to ensure that identity politics and systemic racism dogma rips us apart, but can't we just cheat and send all the brainwashed idiots they have produced here over to them? Knowing they would never allow that poison in their own country, I'm sure the CCP would likely stick em all in concentration camps and harvest their organs like they do with the Uyghur Muslims, but I think I could make peace with that at this point.
You can find your senators and send it to them via this link: https://contactsenators.com/
Dear Senator,
I request you exercise your Constitutional and statutory authority to object to the certification of any elector from any state that refuses to allow a meaningful audit of the November general election for electors to the Presidency, which must include: 1) a re-canvass of the vote that authorizes independent confirmation of a signature match using the same standards the same election officials use for nomination petitions, recall petitions, and initiative petitions; 2) publishing of the ballots for the world to review and observe, as states promised when they wrote large taxpayer checks to election machine companies like Dominion and others; and 3) audited review of the voter rolls to insure only qualified voters cast ballots for electors to the Presidency. If a state refuses to allow an honest audit of the vote, then I request you object to the certification of any electors from that state which has refused such an audit. At present, this includes the electors from Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin.
There are reasons for my concern. The state legislatures in the respective states chose a method for choosing electors to the Presidency that cabined who qualified to vote, constricted the manner in which a vote could be cast, and circumscribed how the vote could be counted. Many of the restrictions and requirements for each of those three were not followed by several of the states in question. President Carter warned in 2005 that absentee ballots posed the greatest risk of fraud. The New York Times agreed in 2012 that absentee ballots posed the greatest risk of fraud. Jurists, experts, and election officials all concurred that mass mail-in balloting posed the greatest risk of fraud. We just had the biggest absentee-ballot driven election in American history. Yet, the very safety guardrails of this election were systemically and systematically removed, often without the assent or consent of the state legislatures, despite the express promise and explicit protection of the Electors Clause to the Constitution. Midnight counts outside the meaningful observation of poll-watchers. 11% signature mismatches according to the Democratic expert in the election contest in Arizona. Votes from dead people, non-citizens, and non-residents found in the research of Matt Braynard and Richard Baris. Inherently high error rates using Dominion software that allowed for thousands of ballots to be adjudicated unfairly in Michigan. Is it really too much to ask that states publish the ballots they promised to publish? Is it really too much to ask that states allow an independently confirmed signature match, at least to a statistically significant sample, of the absentee ballots? Is it really too much to ask for the states to affirm that only those qualified to vote cast ballots for the Presidency?
The Supreme Court directed any remedy to you, and Congress, when it declined to hear the case brought by the state of Texas, a suit joined by the Attorneys General for 18 states representing more than 100 million Americans, 126 members of Congress, high ranking state legislators from the objectionable elections of the states at issue, and public interest advocacy groups representing millions of Americans. I ask that you please support honesty, fairness, and the Constitution by objecting to electors under the circumstances herein described. My family and I are very concerned about the fight we see against transparency, and the fact that evidence and illegitimate actions that could affect the election outcome are not being given a chance to be heard in the courts. It would restore confidence to me, my family, and more than 74 million Americans who voted for President Trump, that our concerns about this election are meaningfully addressed in the only place the courts have directed remedy can occur: the halls of Congress.
The Constitutional conscience of the country depends upon the choices you make. Many thanks for your kind attention to these critical concerns.
Thank You, XXX An American Citizen
Video explanation: https://banned.video/watch?id=5fda54cf5b426104ced66be7
Senator Letter Draft: No Copyright Claimed
Dear Senator,
I request you exercise your Constitutional and statutory authority to object to the certification of any elector from any state that refuses to allow a meaningful audit of the November general election for electors to the Presidency, which must include: 1) a re-canvass of the vote that authorizes independent confirmation of a signature match using the same standards the same election officials use for nomination petitions, recall petitions, and initiative petitions; 2) publishing of the ballots for the world to review and observe, as states promised when they wrote large taxpayer checks to election machine companies like Dominion and others; and 3) audited review of the voter rolls to insure only qualified voters cast ballots for electors to the Presidency. If a state refuses to allow an honest audit of the vote, then I request you object to the certification of any electors from that state which has refused such an audit. At present, this includes the electors from Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.
There is reason for my concern. The state legislatures in the respective states chose a method for choosing electors to the Presidency that cabined who qualified to vote, constricted the manner in which a vote could be cast, and circumscribed how the vote could be counted. Many of the restrictions and requirements for each of those three were not followed by several of the states in question. President Carter warned in 2005 that absentee ballots posed the greatest risk of fraud. The New York Times agreed in 2012 that absentee ballots posed the greatest risk of fraud. Jurists, experts, and election officials all concurred that mass mail-in balloting posed the greatest risk of fraud. We just had the biggest absentee-ballot driven election in American history. Yet, the very safety guardrails of this election were systemically and systematically removed, often without the assent or consent of the state legislatures, despite the express promise and explicit protection of the Electors Clause to the Constitution. Midnight counts outside the meaningful observation of poll-watchers. 11% signature mismatches according to the Democratic expert in the election contest in Arizona. Votes from dead people, non-citizens, and non-residents found in the research of Matt Braynard and Richard Baris. Is it really too much to ask that states publish the ballots they promised to publish? Is it really too much to ask that states allow an independently confirmed signature match, at least to a statistically significant sample, of the absentee ballots? Is it really too much to ask for the states to affirm that only those qualified to vote cast ballots for the Presidency?
The Supreme Court directed any remedy to you, and Congress, when it declined to hear the case brought by the state of Texas, a suit joined by the Attorneys General for 18 states representing more than 100 million Americans, 126 members of Congress, high ranking state legislators from the objectionable elections of the states at issue, and public interest advocacy groups representing millions of Americans. I ask that you do me the small favor of simply objecting to electors under the circumstances herein described. At a minimum, it can give confidence to me, and more than 74 million Americans who voted for President Trump, that our concerns about this election were taken seriously and meaningfully addressed in the only place the courts have directed remedy can occur: the halls of Congress.
The Constitutional conscience of the country depends upon the choices you make. Many thanks for your kind attention to these critical concerns.
Thank You,
XXX A Simple American
Pretty much all of the brainwashing news sites have removed their comment sections, so you can't try to reach out to anyone to challenge the brainwashing. Facebook banned my account in 2017. YouTube shadowbans every comment I make. I've tried posting comments on Reddit only for them to be instantly removed. Twitter censors everything too.
It's fucking suffocating. I want to be able to talk to people who disagree with me without being censored! Authoritarian cunts have taken over the world it seems.
This was a vote that truly revealed the authoritarians who hate both us and the Constitution; take note of it; KNOW YOUR ENEMIES BY THEIR VOTES!
Senate: https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/116-2020/s264
House: https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/116-2020/h238
They ignored Trump's call to end 230 protection! They then voted for this law that makes it legal to propagandize you with a supermajority so Trump won't be able to veto it. If you don't like it, this law always gives them the option to detain you indefinitely without a trial!