He lives in PA and he knows about the legislature argument. The Republican Legislature in PA passed the laws allowing mail-in ballots in 2019. They later claimed it was unconstitutional (at the state level) but the constitution doesn't actually prohibit it. It's frustrating. I've tried to read the US Supreme Court briefs related to the case and it's too complicated for me to understand.
Thanks. I've tried to use that federalist article to convince him but the reasoning is too weak. It asks why was were there so many more voters than normal? Why did Biden get so many votes? It's too easy for someone to say... simple, "Trump was a crap President and everyone came out to be sure he was not elected". Of course, it also means there was many more Trump supporters too, just not enough to win. In any case, none of it is strong enough evidence to convince someone of fraud, unless they already want to believe it.
Good luck with the mobile phone part. iOS and Android have about 99.7% combined market share in the USA. I wonder what FL will use instead? Windows 10 Mobile? kek
My brother-in-law says the fraud was negligible and the "statistical impossibilities" claims are based on incorrect data. Do you have references to some of the impossibilities that hasn't been deboonked? I'd like to show it to him.
What we call DS is hidden/secret and is a conspiracy (against DJT and others). If you read his book, he's not just opposed to the DS term, but to the very concept of the DS. However, who knows what he really believes. He's all about creating conflict though culture/info wars.
You still listen to Bannon after he denied the existence of the DS? https://trofire.com/2019/10/04/steve-bannon-admits-theres-no-truth-to-deep-state-conspiracy-theories/
Sorry if this is a silly question, but is this related to https://patriotparty.info/ at all? Or is it a different take on a Patriot Party?
ok, I'll stop asking so many questions, but I really do want to know. I think for myself and try to make objective, evidence-based decisions. However, my brother-in-law is making some good counter-arguments and I'm starting to have some doubts. At least in PA, it was the Republican Legislature that passed the laws allowing mail-in ballots, not the Democrats. No courts were involved in that specific action (they were in others). Thanks for all the info.