ban assault weapons

today my 8 year old told me

Straight men's physiological stress response to seeing two men kissing is the same as seeing a bottle of tequila while hung over.

he wouldn't have been shot if those pigs hadn't been there to arrest him.

no, they don't, and no, it doesn't. (moron)

literally gave you 8 examples.

taking time to make a comment doesn't mean that you care about or have interest in the subject of the comment.

you saw the topic and then engaged in the process of both thought and physical activity based upon you seeing the topic

perhaps it was a pavlovian response, perhaps i was trolling, perhaps i saw an opportunity to make an offensive joke (that's the one that actually happened). none of these behaviors require interest in this subject. maybe i'm just an asshole, maybe i'm bored, maybe i was scrolling through the rising posts and wanted to run my mouth to engage some retard like you into a drawn out conversation. none of these things require interest in stephen crowder.

you can pick up a product in the store without expressing interest. it's called picking up a product. you can pick up the product from the floor to replace it, you can pick it up to move it to the side. there are many reasons you can pick up a product at a store that require no interest.

the state of wanting to know or learn about something or someone.

1a : a feeling that accompanies or causes special attention to something or someone : concern. b : something or someone that arouses such attention. c : a quality in a thing or person arousing interest.

you can comment on any subject disinterestedly. the expression of disinterest is not tantamount to the expression of interest.

you're just dumb, bro.

choosing to make a comment is not tantamount to interest in a subject.

lots of people like and respect obama, dumbass.

it doesn't matter whether it was compelled, coerced, or voluntary. an expression of disinterest is not tantamount to interest. an expression of disinterest is not tantamount to care. it does not clearly indicate interest in the topic, it clearly indicates disinterest in the topic. that's also not "virtue signaling".

i don't know about crowder or whatever. i don't care about crowder. i'm not interested in crowder. crowder has nothing to do with the fact that an expression of disinterest is not tantamount to interest. an expression of interest is not tantamount to care, regardless of whether time and work were invested in committing that expression, voluntarily or otherwise.

no, it doesn't.

a person voluntarily taking the time to come into a thread about a topic in order to claim disinterest does not indicate interest, nor does it indicate care. that's not an expression of interest, it's an expression of disinterest. you may find, if you search within yourself (or perhaps are reborn with a greater intellectual capacity), that some people are interested in aspects of communication tangential to the subjects of a given forum, and your dogmatic adherence to the "not x means x" position is blatantly retarded.

the fact remains, after all of your delusional inventions about my behaviors, that expressing disinterest in something is not tantamount to caring about or being interested in something. saying you don't care about something is not tantamount to caring about it. anything you glean further from those sorts of proclamations is just you making stuff up and believing it. because you're a moron. idiot.

no, it doesn't illustrate that i cared enough about the subject matter to take the time to come into a topic. whether i was forced or compelled is irrelevant. it illustrates that i didn't want to watch the video, and made a joke about crowder dying from the demonstration.

there's nothing to cover up. even if i expressed disinterest, it doesn't change my position and reason for responding in this particular thread of comments.

i'm not desperately trying to change anything. the fact remains that expressing disinterest in something is not tantamount to caring about it or being interested in it. spending time to participate in a given action does not indicate care or interest. my interest in this particular comment thread is expressing a position that expressing disinterest in something is not tantamount to caring about it. that argument is isolated from any specific subject matter, including somebody saying they don't care about this fag, or me saying i don't want to watch a video.

you cling to tangential red herrings, because you want a gotcha moment to shore up your feelings based on your stupid position that saying you're not interested in something is tantamount to caring about something in actuality, and that spending time doing something implies care or interest. that's just not true.

even granting that you're correct for the sake of getting back to the substance of the discussion, that my original post was "purely" to express disinterest in watching the video (my post wasn't to express disinterest, the expression of disinterest was a setup for a joke about crowder ironically dying), it doesn't change the fact that an expression of disinterest is not an expression of interest. an expression of lack of care is not an expression of care. saying "i do not x" does not mean that "i do x". an expression of disinterest does not imply caring. spending time to make an expression about a subject does not mean you care about something. that's just some shit delusional retards like you believe when it's convenient for expressing your stupidity.

because somebody uses time expressing themselves, does not mean that they care about what they're expressing themselves about. i'll demonstrate:

1. stephen crowder fucks an animal in a youtube video

2. i say "i don't want to watch this fag fuck an animal"

3. you say "lol you spent time saying you're not interested, that means you care about stephen crowder"

4. stephen crowder scratches his arm in a youtube video

5. i say "i don't want to watch this fag scratch his arm"

6. you say "lol you spent time saying you're not interested, that means you care about stephen crowder"

how is that the 'biggest redpill'? both teams are playing the same game is your #1 revelation in life? really? this guy's such an insufferable faggot.

i didn't take time to express disinterest, moron. once again, you're conflating me for somebody else (or some delusion spawned from the mental bloodfarts you experience as "imagination"). "an interest in expressing disinterest" is definitively not an interest in something other than "an interest in expressing disinterest". that's literally "an interest in expressing disinterest". an interest in, for example, stephen crowder, would be "an interest in stephen crowder", not "an interest in expressing disinterest", nor "an interest in expressing disinterest about stephen crowder". "an interest in stephen crowder", "an interest in expressing disinterest", and "an interest in expressing disinterest about stephen crowder" are different interests. you're so stupid that you cannot conceive of this difference. you are a victim of your own moronic conflation, and i equate the level of cringe pain i feel at your stupidity to something like forcing a dry, rusted screwdriver fully into my urethra. you're that painfully stupid, moron.

i didn't claim not to care (though i don't). you keep confusing me with the other guy, and you keep talking to me as though i am him, even though i've repeatedly stated that i am not him, and i did not say what he did. you are actually retarded. it's amazing that technology has come so far so as to allow people of such limited intellectual faculties as yourself to communicate, albeit very poorly, on the internet.

you can imagine whatever you like, that doesn't make it true, and even if it is true, doesn't make it relevant, idiot. your proclivity for violent fantasy is more an expression of your sub-hundred iq than any valid opposition to my point that an expression of lack of care about a subject is not an expression of care about that subject.

placing care or value in my actions is not tantamount to placing care or value in whatever tangential subject you insist i place care or value in, moron.

you're a smug dumbfuck attempting to deride somebody's offhand statement of valuation by delusionally ascribing motive or valuation that suits your preconceived notions.

you don't have to care about something to express a sentiment about it, idiot.

#1 i'm not the original guy who commented about not giving a fuck about this fag (althought i second his pronouncement)

#2 expressing disinterest in something is not an expression of interest, expressing hate for something is not an expression of love, expressing lack of care for something is not an expression of care. it's an observational sentiment intended to convey a critical perspective of a person as superfluous.

#3 you're a fag if you're the kind of guy who says "you obviously care because you said you don't care" (fag)

#4 fag

this isn't about hiring pilots, it's about training pilots. whether or not a trainee becomes a pilot is secondary. there's also nothing wrong with a company setting a quota to draft trainees from underprivileged segments of society.

the act of voicing a lack of care for a subject is not tantamount to care for that subject. you're a moron.

i don't want to watch this annoying fag. is the result as obvious as i expect? (crowder is now dead?)

i think this chick would be surprised to learn just how much effort white people have to put into not provoking black rage.

thanks for being a creepy weirdo and giving me your unsolicited opinion

absolutely retarded.