1
reasonablydisturbed 1 point ago +1 / -0

Violence is not the answer my friend. I know everyone is emotional but that type of rhetoric is playing into the left's hands and does nothing more than fuel their campaign against the right. Where we utterly fail is on the culture war and the technological front. We are all being silenced and cancelled. The left holds all the cards and if you take notice, no matter how bat shit insane the left's ideas are, they are always united. The right takes a more balanced approach and tries to objectively argue points which causes fractures in our armor. The left really has none. If we want to win, truly win, we have to unite and start make our voices heard. Parler tried and was immediately killed. I don't know the whole story on it, but that was a conservative site and they ripped it down in fear that it was competing with Facebook/Twitter. Youtube is purging conservative voices as well and don't get me started on the news channels/sites. We have to concentrate our efforts there first to get our voices heard.

2
reasonablydisturbed 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah it's not a complex document and not a long read even with the amendments. I still to this day believe that a test on the Constitution must be administered to anyone seeking to be a representative, senator or President. You want to swear to uphold and defend it, imma need you to read it and take this comprehensive test on it first before you can throw your hat in the ring.

39
reasonablydisturbed 39 points ago +39 / -0

If you ever wondered why people have such a jacked up understanding of the constitution, look no further than constitutional professor Raskin. His twisting of the constitution is almost criminal and it physically pains me knowing this guy supposedly taught constitutional law but it does make sense. He must have been the professor for all those quality criminal and law analysts on mainstream media.

6
reasonablydisturbed 6 points ago +6 / -0

Maybe someone should investigate whether or not there was a recent deposit in his checking account or if he received and shares of a company or a deal on a transaction.

2
reasonablydisturbed 2 points ago +2 / -0

How does this not cut against the Civil Rights Act in every fashion? Does it not state explicitly that employers will not discriminate based on race, color, sex, etc? So, if these clowns are saying "we are not hiring you unless you are a certain color or race" how in the hell are they not being dragged into court?

1
reasonablydisturbed 1 point ago +1 / -0

Honest question. Knowing this is a farce and 100% unconstitutional, is there a remedy for President Trump to sue the federal government, particularly the members of the house and senate who pushed for this, into oblivion for shredding the constitution and trying to unlawfully prosecute him?

1
reasonablydisturbed 1 point ago +1 / -0

Who is going to vote to limit their strangle hold on the country? Have you been watching this shit show? They are trying to unconstitutionally use a political tool to remove someone from office that is already gone. Hey the Chief Justice says he wants no part in this so let's make something up that the sheep will willingly accept. Cruz knows he would never receive the two-thirds votes in each house for this and we don't have control of two-thirds of the state legislatures. Just more political theatre.

3
reasonablydisturbed 3 points ago +3 / -0

Why are they both not in handcuffs right now? They seem like the types that would rat out everyone up the chain to stay out of prison.

2
reasonablydisturbed 2 points ago +2 / -0

Translation: Pelosi and McConnell knew, did nothing, and release of such information would be too embarrassing and would cut against the incitement narrative they pushed against the President.

1
reasonablydisturbed 1 point ago +1 / -0

If so, maybe that should be a wake up call that you are not doing freedom right, failing miserable as a representative of the people, and your outlook on life is an absolute dumpster fire but hey, blame it on the boogey man in the red hat.

2
reasonablydisturbed 2 points ago +2 / -0

While I applaud her for doing this and think it would be epic to drop impeachment charges day 1, sadly it won't go anywhere. Demonrats are nothing if not unitary. They hold the majority of the house and you can damn well see the same RINOs that voted yes for POTUS's impeachment voting no for Biden.

2
reasonablydisturbed 2 points ago +2 / -0

Don't give them any ideas Mark.......when Biden gets 25th'd on 21 January and then you impeach heels up Harris, that leaves us with the crypt keeper as President.

1
reasonablydisturbed 1 point ago +1 / -0

That dude probably fought in WWII. He has seen hell and defended against it in some of the most gruesome fighting this world has ever seen. Now he gets hauled off because of a flu. Every cop that laid a hand on that man should be fired.

6
reasonablydisturbed 6 points ago +6 / -0

Operation CLEAN SLATE. Fire everyone and begin anew. No career bureaucrats, no lobbyists. Just a bunch of regular people that support his administration. Not yes men, but people that will guide him through and provide meaningful and constructive criticisms, feedback, and advice.

1
reasonablydisturbed 1 point ago +1 / -0

Won't matter even if he wins. The ballots will be "lost, stolen, or destroyed" before his team gets their hands on them. Oh, the supposed images on the USPS network, yeah those will be "corrupted" too. It's the Democrat way. Unless everything is taken and held by force, mark my words this is exactly how it will all play out.

2
reasonablydisturbed 2 points ago +2 / -0

Correct. So assuming the GOP loses both, my issue is that it still wont be 50/50 or rather, it would but it would be 50/50 in name only. Murkowski is a coward and Romney is a worthless douche that masquerades as a republican. A true RINO.

13
reasonablydisturbed 13 points ago +13 / -0

I love Mark but he is not seeing this correctly. He is incorrectly assuming it will be a 50/50 split......he must have forgotten about Murkowski and that cum rag RINO Mittens

11
reasonablydisturbed 11 points ago +11 / -0

Their committee knows that all of 5 people will show up to the parade so to keep the charade of "most votes ever" they will do it over skype or zoom or some shit and blame the chicom virus. That's the only explanation.

1
reasonablydisturbed 1 point ago +1 / -0

McShitcain can fuck right the hell off. Her and her entire corrupt family.

2
reasonablydisturbed 2 points ago +2 / -0

New York is gone......expel them from the Union, designate them as a failed state, invade them, hold military tribunals for all in power, hang, rinse, repeat in California.

view more: Next ›