3
redmoose 3 points ago +3 / -0

Seems like it. Too bad... Plenty of great evidence of trouble without having to lie. I'd hope we'd invite criticism at least about fact claims.

3
redmoose 3 points ago +3 / -0

Can someone who down voted explain why? Seen this rebuttal a few times and it seems right. Down vote without rebuttal is a tantrum.

2
redmoose 2 points ago +2 / -0

I believe it's an equal application of tos thing. This site has unambiguous rules applied consistently.

2
redmoose 2 points ago +2 / -0

Are they warning about a.. deep state??

1
redmoose 1 point ago +1 / -0

Bongino ftw. There are others, but I'm always very impressed with how careful and responsible bongino is with how he makes claims and characterizes news.

1
redmoose 1 point ago +1 / -0

By this logic, we should be suspicious of the impossibly few votes that went to 3rd parties. It's suspicious given other occurrences by comparison but the odds conclusion as stated seems like a false premise.

1
redmoose 1 point ago +1 / -0

To what end? Attacking politicians? Insurrection act. Attacking citizens? If you show up on racist.watch... I mean donor.watch they are calling it now, yes, make sure you are armed.

4
redmoose 4 points ago +4 / -0

Well ya. What do you think I'm doing right now? Haven't even gotten out of bed yet lol

1
redmoose 1 point ago +1 / -0

Been really impressed with crowder. Always well sourced. Always measured when making actual claims. Excellent analysis and coverage.

4
redmoose 4 points ago +4 / -0

You don't. Donations are public information.

1
redmoose 1 point ago +1 / -0

Too easy to tease as "the lyin' party". Lion graphic is good for memes though. Should go with "the American party" or something with the lion as logo. Though don't split up gop. Maybe good to treat like "the tea party" where it's more of a movement.

2
redmoose 2 points ago +2 / -0

I just click hold > open new tab. Great advice ty! Though I also disabled endless scrolling to eliminate losing my place.

-1
redmoose -1 points ago +1 / -2

I found a few studies cautioning the application of Benfords law to elections. I think it's fair to be cautious with claims based on it's use.

1
redmoose 1 point ago +1 / -0

He claims it is simple to make many copies of the program serving the website which can respond to more visits but that it is likely that single data source the application relies on that is slow to fulfill the many requests being made.

1
redmoose 1 point ago +1 / -0

Shit is going to get insanely hairy early November. Might be worth refactoring to an S3 static frontend with a varnish middle layer so you can at least read recent posts. I trust the team will make it work but please PM me know if you have any interest in an infra performance dialogue.

Edit: I see the front end server points now. Will dial back my infra offer. Thank you for this website.

1
redmoose 1 point ago +1 / -0

Didn't know this, thanks. Maybe it is a fair tweet afterall.

2
redmoose 2 points ago +2 / -0

The west has always burned seasonally. The claim is the already drier west was drier for longer now and is thus at more fire risk. The climate claim is about weather being more extreme. This is like saying: Florida got more hurricanes but why not Canada.

Not saying climate claims have no problems just that the original comment fairly criticizes this one week gotcha.

1
redmoose 1 point ago +2 / -1

Glad to see this rebuttal in comments. There are plenty of better challenges to be made about the nature of fires in the west. "Same global climate" seems a shallow jab.

1
redmoose 1 point ago +1 / -0

First sentence: "the coronavirus is not under control".

2
redmoose 2 points ago +2 / -0

I've got a DevOps background. Is it possible to talk to sysadmins somehow in case I'm able to contribute to improving caching or something?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›