5
redpillsrus 5 points ago +5 / -0

I wouldn't say I know for a fact they- or somebody- did not hack machines. That definitely could have happened, and the Antrim report is good evidence. I'm just saying this Mary Fanning report is not good evidence, and I have reason to believe it is a scam that could hurt our credibility (or pocket books!).

11
redpillsrus 11 points ago +11 / -0

No. Not what this spreadsheet is claiming. I've been on here since reddit. I've seen lots of theories, data, etc. The "true" data we have that shows fraud is: mail in ballot data from PA, voter records compared to death records, video and affidavits of shipped in fake ballots, the antrim report showing deleted logs, and statistical evidence based on election tallies (ie "the spike"). There is plenty of reason to doubt the election. But I have not seen real packet captures of the actual fraud traffic, which is what this video-of-a-spreadsheet claims to summarize.

5
redpillsrus 5 points ago +5 / -0

I have checked the IP addresses. They are IP addresses associated with the names they say in the spreadsheet. However, ANYBODY could take those IP addresses and put them in a spreadsheet. I could literally make the same spreadsheet and replace the name Trump with Biden to show the opposite.

For the spreadsheet to mean anything, we need more information about the data used to create it. Add to that that the guy showing it to us (Dennis Montgomery) has several scams under his belt, the correct thing to do is be skeptical of the Mary Fanning claim. The other claims seem more legit both technically and in who is producing them.

21
redpillsrus 21 points ago +23 / -2

Read the posts from a couple days ago. I say the same thing. I think Mike is being fooled by blxware.org. Now I'm saying either Mary is fooled as well or is doing the fooling, and providing additional info.

6
redpillsrus 6 points ago +6 / -0

Same here. This would have to be wireshark or similar packet capture at either end of the traffic, OR packet capture at ISPs in between by nation-state level monitoring. Regardless, I need some more info about this data before I believe it.

Without more explanation, I have to think that particular claim is a larp meant to discredit the other more credible claims he brings up.

4
redpillsrus 4 points ago +4 / -0

That’s funny and all, but next time use Hunter Crack photos

4
redpillsrus 4 points ago +4 / -0

We need a public database of these arrests, FBI reports, etc. So far, they seem to fall into a few categories: Agent Provoceurs (James Sullivan) Antifa or Dem (these two) Maybe-MAGA-but-a-little-crazy attention-seekers (Viking dude) Mostly harmless MAGA (little old lady, stay between the rope people)

17
redpillsrus 17 points ago +17 / -0

The is beautiful. More of this please. Then build your own presidential library before Obama gets his.

3
redpillsrus 3 points ago +3 / -0

I've read this a couple times, and am not sure what it's trying to say. Is there some specific action we're supposed to be taking? ELI5?

2
redpillsrus 2 points ago +2 / -0

I really like this idea and I've been thinking the same thing. Memes, shitposts, etc have their place, but I also think there is a market for a low-key, facts-only site. www.hereistheevidence.com and c19study.com are sort of what I have in mind, but they let a little shouting creep in. We need something to hand normies on any given topic and say "look, there are a lot of opinions on X issue, but at least step back and see the main-stream media narrative for what it is: one very skewed narrative from the far left.

I'm a web dev and really may build something like this.

60
redpillsrus 60 points ago +60 / -0

I still worry this guy is well meaning, but being fooled by some fraudsters. Blxware referenced on his site is just shady as hell. I’ll watch the doc, but it shouldnt take 3 hours- it’s plain as day. Go over the low-hanging fruit of dead voters, mail in fraud, and rule changes without legislators. Then, show the spikes, the GA hidden box video that correlates with a spike, and affidavits of people saying they saw boxes of fake ballots being brought in. Make clear this is all proven beyond what most courts would require, but most courts only rejected on standing. Show cases. That’s enough to show the steal.

THEN if you really feel the need, mention hacking of election machines, Dominion manipulation, and present any evidence you may have of that. But it had better be really good evidence. Wireshark captures or screen grabs of the machines running the fraud or a Dominion employee spilling the beans. A sketchy website with a donate now button is not evidence.

6
redpillsrus 6 points ago +6 / -0

India.win - get on it mods!

11
redpillsrus 11 points ago +11 / -0

That’s a good step, but what I want to see happen is the whole lot of them go down with police and physically take the machines into custody. Except it should have happened in November because now the machines have likely been wiped.

3
redpillsrus 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's probably also hard for them to work alongside people whose operatives were caught on video ballot harvesting. I fear no accountability for this fraud will turn this toxic election into a worse situation.

2
redpillsrus 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't know. I wouldn't say only "fools" fall for larps though. He strikes me as a typical CEO type. Knows enough to be dangerous, but not an IT expert by a long shot. If my theory is correct, the IT people he's consulting with (blxware) are the larpers.

4
redpillsrus 4 points ago +4 / -0

I agree it was stolen. I just think there is a chance this blxware site could be an effort to distract, and not actual evidence.

4
redpillsrus 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yes. As I said, I do think fraud happened, and it’s possible remote entities hacked machines. I just am not convinced this blxware site is legit.

24
redpillsrus 24 points ago +24 / -0

Fun to see this on here. I actually think that space - and especially private sector space can be a big factor in conservative politics moving forward.

First, SpaceX is clearly a Trump era win, and private sector is here to stay. His policies for moon-then-mars and funding for space, and reduction of red tape at FAA, EPA, and NASA paved the way for this progress. SpaceX shows how lean private industry is better than entrenched bureaucracy at developing rockets. There's a place for NASA, but SLS is Apollo tech and moving sooo much slower than SpaceX.

Second, almost everybody can get behind the idea of space. It's a populist platform agenda. Sure, some object on grounds that funding may be better spent on XYZ, but that's where conservatives have an edge: public funds are limited, but that's why we want to incentivize private sector space initiatives and build a marketplace. Space tourism, commercial launch, and even mining are now on our horizon and if government facilitates when appropriate and then stays out of the way, we will launch whole new industries.

Third, America is first in this area. Russia is flying old rockets, and everybody is way behind our tech. If Biden doesn't screw it up or sell it to China, we're set to return to the moon, send men to mars, and start up several industries around space.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›