1
redsanta 1 point ago +1 / -0

Listen you child molester. The article states preferred candidates will be felons. That is what it states and is what I'm opposed to. This thread had brought out all the kiddie diddlers.

1
redsanta 1 point ago +1 / -0

You are a clown. This is quoted directly from the article

"But applicants with clean criminal histories should be wary before applying. DOC says the “ideal” candidate is a felon, offering extra points to lawbreakers."

1
redsanta 1 point ago +1 / -0

People arent supporting russia so much as wanting to stop US ridiculousness

2
redsanta 2 points ago +2 / -0

The USA will blow up vital infrastructure. Nord stream proves this.

1
redsanta 1 point ago +1 / -0

Are Russian reserves depleting? Seems they have huge amounts of oil. The USA is buying it right now via India. Oil is the second most abundant liquid on earth (and is found elsewhere in the universe). It doesnt come from algae no matter what your second grade teacher told you.

2
redsanta 2 points ago +3 / -1

Lol. Clown. USA did that too. You havent been paying attention.

-1
redsanta -1 points ago +1 / -2

Really? You can't even rebut these simple points. You are a clown....lol

  1. Virtually all of the largest oil fields are located near major deep fault zones – the Persian Gulf, East Texas/Mexico, Southern California, the Caucasus/Donets Basin and the Caspian Basin). (Did you ever wonder why most of the dinosaurs retired to deep fault zones before they passed away?)

  2. Since 1955, the Soviets and ex-Soviets modified their exploration practices based on the abyssal abiotic theory. They have found 90 new oil fields (not 90 wells, but 90 regions rich in oil), of which 80 obtain part or all their oil from crystalline basement rock. This made the Soviet Union the largest oil-producing country in the world, rivaled only by Saudi Arabia.

  3. As of the 1990s, the largest wells in the Persian Gulf had been producing oil under pressure at rates of roughly 100,000 barrels per day for 70 years. Neither the pressure nor the daily output declined substantially during that period. This supports the theory that the oil comes from huge reservoirs that are indigenous parts of the earth, and not from remains of biotic matter (remains of living things).

  4. Chemical thermodynamics decisively supports the abyssal abiotic theory.

Thermodynamic calculations show that petroleum chain molecules (except methane) can form only at pressures and temperatures reached at depths greater than 100 kilometers (60 miles) below the surface of the earth. The calculations also show that petroleum chain molecules (except methane) cannot form from biotic chemicals like proteins and carbohydrates, even at a depth of 100 kilometers.

There are no biotic remains (remains of formerly living matter) at depths of 100 kilometers.

  1. Experiments conducted at very high pressures in the former Soviet Union confirm the theoretical results; that is, you can form long-chain petroleum molecules in roughly the proportions found in crude oil from methane at the stated pressures and temperatures; and you cannot form long-chain petroleum molecules from abiotic matter at less extreme pressures and temperatures.

  2. The leading argument in support of the biotic theory does not stand up. This argument claims that only biotic molecules exhibit “optical activity” (i.e. they react differently to light of different polarizations), and petroleum exhibits optical activity, so petroleum must originate from biotic matter [Kenney 2000].

view more: Next ›