I want to watch but crowder, and much as I love him, never can stfu for 5 minutes.
From her dissent - Kanter vs. Barr https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca7/18-1478/18-1478-2019-03-15.html
page 27 (I think)
Neither felons nor the mentally ill are categorically excluded from our national community. That does not mean that the government cannot prevent them from possessing guns. Instead, it means that the question is whether the government has the power to disable the exercise of a right that they otherwise possess, rather than whether they possess the right at all.
page 33
historical evidence does, however, support [this] proposition: that the legislature may disarm those who have demonstrated a proclivity for violence or whose possession of guns would otherwise threaten the public safety. This is a category simultaneously broader and narrower than “felons”—it includes dangerous people who have not been convicted of felonies but not felons lacking indicia of dangerousness.
Page 55
History does not support the proposition that felons lose their Second Amendment rights solely because of their status as felons. But it does support the proposition that the state can take the right to bear arms away from a category of people that it deems dangerous. Our precedent is consistent with this principle: we have held that “Congress is not limited to case-by-case exclusions of persons who have been shown to be [. . .] untrustworthy with weapons, nor need these limits be established by evidence presented in court [. . .] Instead, the legislature can make that judgment on a class-wide basis.
pages 62-63
This does not mean that Wisconsin and the United States cannot disarm Kanter. Even though the mail-fraud conviction, standing alone, is not enough, they might still be able to show that Kanter’s history or characteristics make him likely to misuse firearms. And if banning Kanter, in particular, from possessing a gun is substantially related to the governments’ goal of “preventing armed mayhem,” then the statutes could be constitutionally applied to him.
This is a Blue Print for how ACB will vote, given the right "argument" and is literally the argument for gun control, universal background checks, limited gun ownership scope that liberals use in CA, NY, etc.
DON'T BELIEVE THAT JUST BECAUSE SHE DISSENTED THAT SHE'S SUPPORTING THE 2A, she didn't say the government can't take your guns, she said just said they didn't have enough evidence to suggest to take them from Kanter.
To anybody subscribed to Blaze TV, Crowder is live there now talking about the COVID-19 death rates. Not going to be on YouTube live because likely it will be banned immediately for "false information"
We need to get these clips published on separate channels and out there. Steven's hands are tied, but we can get the word out.
Record.clip.post.reshare.
and btw. . . .
OPENtheUSANOW
