6
rob9 6 points ago +6 / -0

why the Trump Organization considers him radioactive

Because he is quite radical and Trump, especially once you factor in his advisors, is not?

why he thinks he speaks for MAGA too.

I don't think that he thinks that.

He voices his opinions which resonate with a significant part of the right/MAGA movement and tries to further spread his views/the truth. Nothing more, nothing less.

2
rob9 2 points ago +2 / -0

The guy killed was the cashier.

1
rob9 1 point ago +1 / -0

It'd be much simpler for germany to do it on their end. Just have the ISPs point their DNS at some government controlled server and hey presto.

Yeah but then the government would have to admit that they want to censor the whole platform. But see, they only want to ban the evil illegal content. winkwink

It makes neither technical nor logical sense for gab to lift a finger here

But from a legal perspective it does. At least a lot of lawyers from a lot of online platforms seem to think that it does.

(see a lot of US online services either complying to EU privacy laws if they have a lot of visitors from there or banning visitors from the IP ranges if they don't)

1
rob9 1 point ago +1 / -0

No option 3 would make the whole platform not available. (without a VPN)

Option 1 would entail deleting or blocking specific posts/content that are deemed likely to be illegal in Germany. Which would be quite a lot.

0
rob9 0 points ago +1 / -1

orba owns all his own servers, and unless their in Germany, it should not be his concern

He is offering the service in Germany, which means their laws apply as well. Even if they are incredibly stupid laws.

8
rob9 8 points ago +8 / -0

My friend, the Federal republic of Germany did not have free speech since it's founding after WW2. It has a "freedom of opinion", which excludes:

  • insults
  • blasphemy
  • doubting the holocaust
  • saying anything positive about the Third Reich/national socialism or using their symbols, phrases, etc.
  • 'hate speech'
  • saying negative facts about someone that aren't proven to be right, even if it isn't said in public
  • and probably a million things more I'm currently forgetting
4
rob9 4 points ago +4 / -0

Well every German (and everybody else) should use services like Gab only through VPN anyways, so who cares about an IP ban.

Of course disobedience would be the best option from a fighting perspective, but I'm not sure it's worth it in this case.

2
rob9 2 points ago +2 / -0
  1. Which poor excuse of a parent or church or youth camp would accept that thing/vermin as a camp counselor
  2. Also this is likely his sick/dumb fantasy and didn't happen
2
rob9 2 points ago +2 / -0

She is right. Homeschool your kids people!

7
rob9 7 points ago +7 / -0

That's great to see!

But, the problem is that this kind of stuff doesn't achieve much, because it isn't organized and targeted. (like the reporter said, similar images to a month before, which resulted in not much)

Organization is by far the most important task.

3
rob9 3 points ago +3 / -0

I hate when those faggots/traitors/demons use the Bible for their personal agenda and nothing else. And then not even correctly.

The letter to the Ephesians is a letter to the Ephesian Christian congregation. So this verse talks to Christians of another congregation being no longer strangers because they are united as Christians and in their acceptance of Jesus Christ as the Son of God.

The relevance of this verse to flying in muslims in bulk has to be explained to me.

6
rob9 6 points ago +6 / -0

Sadly president can’t fire senators & congress.

Not with that attitude.

6
rob9 6 points ago +6 / -0

Trump negotiated with the Taliban as well to secure our interests? Why wouldn't the chinese do the same?

0
rob9 0 points ago +4 / -4

makes it even more interesting that critical race theory identifies Jews as the apex oppressor.

Since when? I have literally never heard anyone in the mainstream call out jewish overrepresentation.

Even if it is mentioned somewhere in passing, then suddenly ethnic IQ differences and cultural differences exist and are responsible for it, definitely not discrimination. (in contrast to White people, who are apparently only good at oppressing)

1
rob9 1 point ago +1 / -0

but now that the truth is getting out there,

But what is that referring to? Did the MSM report on it or did something specific happen?

Or is this just referencing the general collapse of the narrative in court, which will never be reported outside of our bubble?

1
rob9 1 point ago +2 / -1

Saudis, probably in conjunction with the right guy?

1
rob9 1 point ago +1 / -0

What situation is he referring to with the "just like that"?

2
rob9 2 points ago +2 / -0

An important point is that those are "voluntary" vaccinations. So their parents actually made an appointment and deliver them to the proverbial slaughter house.

2
rob9 2 points ago +2 / -0

The problem you name is correct, but your solution is horrible.

Planned Parenthood is like the lesser of two evils.

In what way is killing babies the lesser of two evils? There literally isn't a greater evil than killing the most innocent of human life.

Every other solution would be preferable.

2
rob9 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think one huge part is that here they'd only have the stick, not the carrot.

Australia can get near "Zero-Covid", because it's a completely isolated island nation. That is the carrot for a lot of the sheep which in turn "justifies" the restrictions.

In the US, a conglomeration of states with different covid regulations, with two huge borders, anything resembling "Zero-Covid" is simply not possible. So you couldn't justify it.


Other big parts include of course a different legal framework and different cultures regarding government, which in the USA could in the worst case result in a primary loss for Uniparty-Guy1 and the election of Uniparty-Guy2. shudder

But I seriously doubt that the guns specifically or fear of violence generally play any significant roll in it. When that hasn't happened yet, it wouldn't happen then.

2
rob9 2 points ago +2 / -0

Compared to what the founding fathers envisioned this point has probably been reached since the civil war at the latest.

And I'm not sure that censorship of "fake news" would be the straw that breaks the camels back.

2
rob9 2 points ago +2 / -0

It doesn't matter what people think. Unless you amend the Constitution the government cannot police speech that doesn't violate the law

So the piece of paper will magically stop them?

3
rob9 3 points ago +3 / -0

They literally stole an election in the most blatant fashion possible, they're holding our people as political prisoners, etc.

But sure only being allowed to have one person of contact would have people suddenly spring into action.

view more: Next ›