I'm starting to see a pattern of fails with Streamable.

Amazing, isn’t it: all of the other observations were gathered without special access to experts, except the most disturbing and damnable one.

That and their tacit approval of fascism in the last paragraph.

https://archive.is/0pRmv

“...BOTH...”

“ALL THREE”

FTFY

Which grandmother?

Hillary’s, Bill’s, or Hubble’s?

Sounds like something else was living in their bodies and was about to get kicked out.

Liberalism wants no consequences for their actions, to have their cake and to eat it too.

Yup.

He goes on to condemn himself as an infiltrator.

It’s the appeal to authority fallacy at play, perhaps with the authority being an abstraction of the scientific process or unnamed practitioners thereof.

Notice the appeal to authority when they demand an ‘empirical article’ (ostensibly made by “experts”) supporting the logical conclusion from freely available information.

Which means a bunch of ugly people are now going to be cocky about having their pictures taken.

Why are you saying she was in on the plan?

https://patriots.win/p/12hRZiBnoC/x/c/4Dx5ab0aPjj

The only thing more awful than this scum is that he’s one of many.

Even Wikipedia gets the genre correct:

Dystopian, political fiction, social science fiction

Link: https://archive.is/GZXA5

ERCOT complied.

They put lives at risk (or to death) because they didn't want to deal with the fallout of breaking oppressive federal laws.

They deserve the AG investigating them.

Do they at least have to prove their intentions?

That way they can arrest them for conspiring and then not pay them for committing a crime.

I knew Reagan was much, much better than Carter.

I remember when riding the bus home in a very blue city and a neighbor who knew/talked to the bus driver came up to his window and said, “Well, they shot him.” It was clearly out of pleasure.

Here’s a nice write up on bills of attainder:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/article-1/section-9/clause-3/bills-of-attainder

Sheesh, the irony.

This is equivalent to a bill of attainder as it, at the minimum, violates the separation of powers in assuming President Trump’s guilt:

The phrase “bill of attainder,” as used in this clause and in clause 1 of § 10, applies to bills of pains and penalties as well as to the traditional bills of attainder.

The prohibition embodied in this clause is not to be narrowly construed in the context of traditional forms but is to be interpreted in accordance with the designs of the framers so as to preclude trial by legislature, which would violate the separation of powers.

I’d watch a highlight announcing the freak show, which is more than I have ever watched of the WNBA.

Oh, I’d probably also watch highlights of crushed hearts from this injustice and then the reactions FW hen it’s reversal.

I know people don’t mean to give liberals a pass by calling them illiterate or ignorant; they’re worse.

They hate truth.

‘Science’ is only as good to them as far as they can use it to manipulate you and I.

Anchorman comes to mind… but that would be a compliment.

You have to look her in the eyes, not the not-eyes.