So that's from a couple weeks ago. But that same Ware County Elections Director said 2 days ago that this is all a lie and Trump's team never got their hands on a Dominion machine to begin with?
But the lawsuit was disputing the duplicated ballots only, of which there are about 50k. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong, and maybe getting a victory here and overturning a few hundred votes will benefit other cases somehow, but I don't think this particular case will amount to much.
It's a meaningless gesture, if you believe the virus acts the way the CDC says it does then eating in a restaurant is inherently risky. Like you say you obviously don't wear a mask at the table while eating, so I think this is just a measure so the local governments can say "look, we did what we could" when the left starts to whine that numbers are rising.
Do we have a case here? There are a lot of moving parts with these lawsuits so maybe I'm not following the right one, but I thought once we got the larger, ~1600 ballot sample only 9 instances of fraudulent ballots were found?
I'm sure Trump got over 50% and won, but you're kidding yourself if you think it was anywhere close to 70%, let alone 90%. Look at historical election splits, the last time either side got over 60% was in the early 1970s, and that was only 60.7%.
Is this that nuts? Tbh it seems entirely expected, and I doubt CNN even cares that much about it being made public - all they're saying is they're not going to give much coverage to POTUS, which seems to be par for the course for them no?
When even Faux News was cutting away from Trump's post-election briefing for fact checks, it's pretty obvious what the mainstream media is up to.
Yeah something about the y axis being (a - x), so the further you go on the x axis naturally the y value will be lower.
That part is a little above my grasp, it sort of makes sense... but he also didn't show the opposite, what happens if you map Bidens results in the same way, which seems lazy at best and manipulative at worst.
This specific point about Biden doing poorly in big cities (except those 4) is pretty easily debooonked, just look up the results in any city that you'd expect to go dem. Pretty sure Trump knows this and is just trolling the libs.
Yes, he does. Maybe u/take-no-part can check his data to verify because he seems to be way more organized/better at this than me, but at 11:49pm, Trump seems to get between 92% - 325% of a batch.
This is probably close to the most legitimate answer. But this Edison data keeps coming up again and again, and honestly I'm starting to feel like an NPC repeating this the last 2 or 3 weeks: it's garbage data, it can't be trusted to give accurate results if you're looking at individual batches, and it's worthless in court.
10 days ago this pede made a really good website that analyzes the database, and points out times where there are mathematical impossibilites:
https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8XO1jLE/help-me-get-attention-on-this-re/
What you'll notice if you flip through a few states - multiple times where the total number of votes decreases. Multiple times where Biden seems to gain more votes than mathematically possible, but also multiple times where Trump does the same.
To call this "official timestamped election night data from Edison Research" is... technically correct I suppose, but Edison is a consumer research firm, and there's nothing really "official" about this data as far as an state or court is concerned.
Reddit is a big offender, you're right, but how are we different in this way. Popular opinions get upvoted, are more easily seen, dissenting opinions downvoted or deported.
It's fine though, all social media is an echo chamber, and like rule #1 says we're a community based on our love/support for GEOTUS - this isn't supposed to be a balanced forum open to debate. I think as long as you're not just getting your news from only one source, you can avoid the "safe space" effect.
That'd be weird if true, Maricopa county even released this video (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aNhCcimt6No) before the election talking about sharpies and how bleed-through isn't an issue due to the off-set ballots.
And when we're talking about someone like Trump, who has a 95% approval rating among Democrats.
lol what
spez: I guess I'm mostly interested in knowing why, if we're using the Trump graphs to indicate fraud, why the Biden graphs look the same. I'm sure Dr Shiva mentioned it but tbh the video was a little dry and my brain is a little fried today so it probably went in one ear and out the other.
double spez: also if he ever explained the wonky math on the Wayne county graph, which I haven't seen a lot of people bring up but really confuses me.
Do we have any info on how he's doing besides this tweet? His son says he's feeling well so I'll believe that. Hopefully he can rest a couple days, and recharge for a big full court press in the SC.