There'd be a huge scandal if they did that, polls didn't even close till 8 so basically none of the vote would have been counted. I mean, legally they had to separate them from the start. If they didn't, there'd be fines, arrests, but probably wouldn't change the final tally as (like I said) I don't think these votes will get overturned anyway.
Who knows, maybe the USPS can track the late arriving ballots. Either way, I wouldn't worry about this - that other plan I linked, that people seem to like more, has nothing to do with keeping the ballots separate.
Maybe, maybe not. The votes are being separated just in case, because who knows, better safe than sorry. Trump's lawyers will surely try to challenge their validity and bring it to court, I personally think it'll be an uphill battle - the Supreme court already said the late-arriving ballots would be valid in October. I've heard people talking about this other possible way to challenge them (ex: https://thedonald.win/p/11PpPMFUBD/trumps-path-in-penn-its-not-abou/c/) but that also seems like a tough sell.
But I'm not a lawyer, so that's just my uniformed take.
Maybe I don't understand the situation/your question, but - PA state guidelines say that ballots arriving after Nov 3 have to be kept separate. Alito just ruled to say - yes, do that. So presumably after they counted them they just kept them in a separate place, apart from the earlier ballots (and know how many there are in case they have to remove them from the count later).
more like 30,000. Despite the title this isn't mostly Trump voters, Clark County is the leftist stronghold in LV and in person voting was roughly 50/50 this year.
So at least that's good. But obviously the 30k libs aren't going to testify.
It's a federal law, has been since 2002. it's for people whose voting eligibility is unclear (like they don't have proper ID or aren't on the voting list, or this year perhaps asked for a mail in but then showed up in person). They cast a provisional ballot that gets set aside until the eligibility can be verified.
Yeah, that's from the original, but most people these days cover John Cale's cover of the song. Cohen actually wrote a ton of verses that never got used, so when Cale asked to cover it (in the early 90s), Cohen sent him some 15 pages/80 verses to choose from.
It's confusing the way it's stated in the tweet, but if it was talking about underperformed Clinton in general then it's just not true (for example, just pick a random liberal city like Portland - Biden surpassed Clinton's vote, by total number and percentage). A few of the responses were saying it's the minority vote, taken from exit polling, so I'm assuming that's what he meant
Why do you think "drain the swamp" was such a powerful message? Democrats and swampy Republicans too, hopefully he make a dent in his second term.