0
russianbot4673 0 points ago +1 / -1

look i understand what everyone means by 'pureblood', you're not getting the vaccine. neither am i.

but we are not purebloods, or at least, we're not going to be.

everyone on our side only focuses on the vax now, and i understand why. it's the only thing we have any control over. they can try to force us, but we can just refuse. possibly lose a job over it. ok.

but the fact of the matter is, that it seems beyond certain all of us are going to get omicron, or some strain, eventually. and you might say 'well so what? it's weak as fuck.' and ok, yeah the symptom are pretty weak. but what if the symptoms were never the actual point of the virus, in terms of killing power?

here's what you people aren't thinking about: a) the whole reason you don't want the vax is a fear that it has something in it. a lot of people have now fallen back on 'no its just because it's experimental'. ok, but the truth is the first and still main reason we don't want it is because the people pushing it also want depopulation, and we don't trust them. don't deny it.

but b) the vaccine isn't killing everyone who takes it, or even the majority of them. it doesn't even seem to kill that many, percentage wise.

but c) if the vaccine WERE designed to kill people, they would be smart enough to make it have a delayed effect. of course you wouldn't want to have it kill everyone right away. nobody else would get it after the first wave of shots were given.

but d) if they could make a vaccine do that, so could they too make the virus (covid) do that.

do we forget that we all believe covid itself was MADE IN A LAB? if 'they' can engineer a vaccine with some kind of delayed killing effect, or infertility, or whatever you think is in it, then why the fuck couldn't they have also just put that same shit in the virus itself?

so, e) you and i are NOT 'pure bloods'. they're saying someone who catches omicron infects something like 7-10 other people. even dr malone who everyone loves now, said that on joe rogan. they're saying it WILL eventually get everyone, at that rate.

so that means ALL OF US are going to have genetic material that has WHO FUCKING KNOWS WHAT IN IT, that was made in some chinese lab.

not exactly sure how in the fuck that makes us purebloods. but if you wanna forget all about the virus that was MADE IN A LAB, and could be genetically engineered to have some time bomb that kills us with cancer or makes us infertile a generation or 10yrs in the future, fine go ahead. pretend like the vaccine is the only fucked up thing going on. because the truth is, if 'they' wanted to, and have the capability to engineer some shit that can kill us on some kind of delay, they could have just as easily put it in the virus. and the virus mutating and becoming weaker but more transmissible could've been factored in. it could be exactly what they wanted in the first place, because this strain makes sure EVERYONE gets it. it could be there's some bit of code in the virus that lays dormant and fucks us down the road, and that could be the real purpose. the symptoms are just a method to make sure everyone spreads it and gets the poison pill that become activated and kills us all later.

but keep telling yourselves you're 'pure bloods'. if you truly believe that the vaccine was somehow engineered to fuck us over down the road, you're pretty stupid for completely forgetting about the LAB MAD VIRUS that goes right along with that vaccine.

my only solace is that if either or both of these things are going to kill us all, at least i'm not stupid enough to go around bragging about being 'pure blood' when i either do or will have man-made genetic material in my body that was made in a fucking lab in china, one way or the other. even if i do refuse the vax. it's not much but at least i use my brain.

3
russianbot4673 3 points ago +3 / -0

gateway pundit's personal interpretation/take on anything is worth jack and shit to me personally.

1
deleted 1 point ago +4 / -3
5
russianbot4673 5 points ago +5 / -0

the funny thing is that when someone posts this here and we look at it, at least i pretty much assumed at first that it's someone who made this, making fun of trannies.

then i noticed it was created by a woman, and thought about it, and thought it might be that it's actually done out of sympathy for 'gender dysphoria' and people who 'experience' it. as if it's a real thing.

looked the artist up to see if there's more of these comics and to try to figure out if she's making fun of liberalism, or if she is one. no other comics, but she was an artist for disney for 20yrs. so do the math.

this comic isn't making fun of trannies, even though out of context it can appear that way. it's sympathizing with them.

maybe that itself is funny too.

4
russianbot4673 4 points ago +4 / -0

the reason that wouldn't get made is because the woman who made this comic didn't make it to make fun of trannies, but to sympathize with them. it just so happens that we can look at it as if it's making fun of them. but it's supposed to make you feel sorry for them because of how they see themselves not matching up with reality.

4
russianbot4673 4 points ago +6 / -2

really kind of doubting that ghislaine would've had to or would've taken the risk of abducting children herself. same with the podestas. they'd probably have people paid to do that sort of thing, just like a mob godfather has paid assassins to kill people for them.

1
russianbot4673 1 point ago +1 / -0

how the fuck are they supposed to get 2/3rds of each house to vote republicans out of congress? the idea doesn't even make sense. they don't have 2/3rds of either, let alone both houses.

1
russianbot4673 1 point ago +4 / -3

yeah what you're saying makes more sense. the head of the WHO just went on a fucking press conference and openly, i guess, talked about the secrete conspiracy to kill children. and also said it's wrong to do that.

makes perfect sense doesn't it, you fucking retard?

1
russianbot4673 1 point ago +1 / -0

so what? dogs are only what their owner makes them. they're basically nothing except what a person makes them into. and guess what? people are that way too, to an extent. parenting dictates how a child turns out and what kind of an adult they become.

1
russianbot4673 1 point ago +1 / -0

you're fucking sick.

1
russianbot4673 1 point ago +1 / -0

so you're suggesting we somehow make people more like dogs.

dogs are basically slaves. they can't do whatever they want. their owner is the center of their entire life and world, and they are dependent on them for basic needs like food, water, shelter, and even to be allowed to breed.

you're saying we need humans to all be enslaved and controlled by some.. owner. makes a lot of sense!

1
russianbot4673 1 point ago +1 / -0

this is just stupid logic. of course there are more evil humans than dogs. dogs don't have free agency to do whatever they want, they have to obey their owner.

Dogs are loyal because they HAVE to be. so it's not some saintly fucking virtue. they know they depend on their owner or they'll starve. you people who think the loyalty of pets means they are somehow these saintly beings are just fucking retards, i'm sorry.

and when people act like the life of a dog is comparable in value to the life of any random human being, guess what shithead? you ARE one of those evil people.

but actually you're not, because most of you people who talk like that, don't actually think that way. it's just some weird virtue signalling bullshit.

1
russianbot4673 1 point ago +1 / -0

ok dum dum.

1
russianbot4673 1 point ago +1 / -0

was it even sold to them? why is everyone saying that? i thought someone found it in a hotel room and just gave it to them.

and i don't see how it's a con. it turned out that the diary must've been legit, because otherwise the FBI wouldn't be raiding veritas over it. in doing that, they themselves attracted attention back this thing that was already going around a year ago, and had been largely forgotten about. and at the same time, they basically verified its authenticity. not sure how that's a 'con'.

it's not the person who found it's fault that veritas couldn't verify it to their personal standards.

-13
russianbot4673 -13 points ago +5 / -18

somewhat agree? you people who act like fucking pets and animals are somehow more sacred or important than people make me sick. you 'somewhat' agree that a fucking dog is maybe not as important as the cop who had 3 kids and a wife? ok. get the fuck outta here with that retardation.

yes pets and animals and especially dogs are great, and yes people love them. they're not even close to being as important as a person though. and they're only loyal because you fucking feed them and own them and dominate them mentally, because they're like retarded children. they know they depend on you 100% and that you're the alpha. that's about all they can understand, so of course they're loyal. you said it yourself 'well trained'. humans actually have some degree of free will once they become adults, which makes them infinitely more important.

5
russianbot4673 5 points ago +5 / -0

they couldn't verify it. they made a video where they addressed the FBI raiding them, and how after not being able to verify it, they just gave it to the FBI because they didn't know what else to do with it.

OK?

3
russianbot4673 3 points ago +12 / -9

i think humans are more important than dogs, but that's just me being crazy i guess.

2
russianbot4673 2 points ago +2 / -0

contacts. so not only people who tested positive, but with the contact tracing, apparently they can come and 'remove' someone who just had contact with someone who has tested positive, after they contact trace everyone they had contact with.

fucking amazing.

2
russianbot4673 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not sure how antifa is a solution to anything, ever. And yes I know you were joking, but it's never funny to joke about being a Soros stooge.

1
russianbot4673 1 point ago +1 / -0

Anyone who holds this bitch up on a pedestal simply because she's a 7 out of 10 is a pathetic moron, and a danger to themselves and to society. If you think this bitch is super cool, please do everyone a favor and never vote again.

9
russianbot4673 9 points ago +9 / -0

but comirnaty doesn't really factor into anything because it's not the one anyone was getting anyway. comirnaty being approved was just a bait and switch smoke screen. the one we can actually get isn't comirnaty, and isn't FDA approved.

11
russianbot4673 11 points ago +12 / -1

hydroxychloroquine and ivermectine are ALREADY FDA approved. the use for them against covid would be 'off label', but they were already FDA approved which means something like the FDA vouched for them as being safe. they already have a track record going back decades, of use in treatment for other ailments, the side effects are already known, and not very bad.

if either of THOSE two drugs were allowed to be used to treat covid, by doctors, widespread, THAT would disallow them to also push vaccines under an EUA only approval. because if it were shown that two drugs already known to be safe could efficiently treat covid, there's no emergency, and no grounds for emergency authorization.

monoclonal antibodies ALSO being approved under emergency authorization doesn't in any way conflict with vaccines being approved for use in the same kind of category.

it's only if there's an already known, existing, proven safe thing that is also shown to effectively treat something. of course common sense would dictate that there is then, no emergency.

0
russianbot4673 0 points ago +1 / -1

to be fair- Qanon is actually retarded, if not a CIA op. and was the guy 'trying to start a child sex trafficking ring' ?

what i read looked like it was just him diddling kids. there's kind of a difference between a lone guy diddling kids, and a child sex trafficking ring.

view more: Next ›