but giving up the word 'straight' to allow them to redefine "straight" as including men who fuck trannies, isn't "turning the tables on them".
abandoning "straight", giving up on straight, and leaving it to them to redefine however they want, and running to a new, stupider label for ourselves, is not turning the tables on them. it's helping them win.
none of this actually addresses anything i said.
i said we shouldn't give up on the word straight.
they can say whatever they want about what straight is or isn't. we shouldn't let them get away with that. we should not let them get away with redefining straight to include people who fuck trannies. it's fucking stupid.
this is what they do, they use language as a weapon against us. they sit around all day inventing new words or co-opting existing words and pushing their new language onto us, like they saw 1984 as an instruction manual.
for example they have tricked a huge % of the population to actually go along with the idea that the word "gender" somehow means something separate and different from the word "sex". so now we live in a world where "sex" means biological sex (your chromosomes) and "gender" means "how you feel". which is complete fucking bullshit. and people just casually accepted that one.
but if you go to google or wherever and type in "etymology" (the history of words" and "gender" you will quickly see that the word gender was 100% interchangeable with the word sex, for hundreds of years. they meant exactly the same thing, and it was always tied in with biology.
and common sense would tell you that that is the case. why would anyone 100yrs ago have had any need for a special word that is all to do with "how you feel with regards to your sex"? go back in time and ask any average random person if they feel like a boy or a girl, separate from what they actually are, and they'll look at you like you're a fucking weirdo. that whole concept didn't even exist back then, at least not in any socially accepted way. there was no need for a word meaning anything like what they tell us "gender" means now. and it never did mean that. they stole the fucking word, and we let them.
the thing that burns me up the worst is when i see normal, non-freako people actually using the "word" "cisgender". so, some lgbt/femenist freako just decides that NORMAL PEOPLE need a label, and THEY should be the ones allowed to invent it. to decide what WE get to be called. and how convenient, that their word for normal people also sounds like "sissy". i'm sure that was pure coincidence and not at all intentional. and sometimes non-freakos actually use that fucking word, playing right into the left's hands, helping them redefine our society by taking control of language itself.
STRAIGHT means and always has meant the same thing- fucking STRAIGHT.
it's really fucking stupid, is what it is.
i get that it's being done to piss off libs by being confrontational, but the stupid irony of it is that it's actually playing right into the left's hands.
we don't need some new label to describe not wanting to fuck a fake woman who has a dick or a big gash wound where a dick used to be. we already have a label for that.
it's just called being straight.
a) it would've pissed off the left MORE, had people just make a point of saying something like "i'm straight and straight men don't fuck chicks with or who ever had dicks".
b) by instead picking a new label, in essence what you are doing is abandoning the label of 'straight' to the left, and thus making it easier for them to get away with spreading the notion that "straight" people can in fact fuck trannies.
c) you should've picked simply the word "straight" as the "hill to die on", not gave it up, not went for some new hill to call your own, some new, much smaller, stupider hill of "super straight". why the fuck should we admit defeat over what "straight" means? fight for simply being straight and insisting that trannies are not part of what it means to be straight.
in short, this whole thing is fucking gay. and counterproductive. it helps accomplish the goals of the left.
sorry but this whole "super straight" thing is actually kind of stupid. i get that it's being done to piss off libs by being confrontational, but the stupid irony of it is that it's actually playing right into the left's hands.
we don't need some new label to describe not wanting to fuck a fake woman who has a dick or a big gash wound where a dick used to be. we already have a label for that.
it's just called being straight.
a) it would've pissed off the left MORE, had people just make a point of saying something like "i'm straight and straight men don't fuck chicks with or who ever had dicks".
b) by instead picking a new label, in essence what you are doing is abandoning the label of 'straight' to the left, and thus making it easier for them to get away with spreading the notion that "straight" people can in fact fuck trannies.
c) you should've picked simply the word "straight" as the "hill to die on", not gave it up, not went for some new hill to call your own, some new, much smaller, stupider hill of "super straight". why the fuck should we admit defeat over what "straight" means? fight for simply being straight and insisting that trannies are not part of what it means to be straight.
in short, this whole thing is fucking gay. and counterproductive. it helps accomplish the goals of the left.
sorry but this whole "super straight" thing is actually kind of stupid. i get that it's being done to piss off libs by being confrontational, but the stupid irony of it is that it's actually playing right into the left's hands.
we don't need some new label to describe not wanting to fuck a fake woman who has a dick or a big gash wound where a dick used to be. we already have a label for that.
it's just called being straight.
a) it would've pissed off the left MORE, had people just make a point of saying something like "i'm straight and straight men don't fuck chicks with or who ever had dicks".
b) by instead picking a new label, in essence what you are doing is abandoning the label of 'straight' to the left, and thus making it easier for them to get away with spreading the notion that "straight" people can in fact fuck trannies.
c) you should've picked simply the word "straight" as the "hill to die on", not gave it up, not went for some new hill to call your own, some new, much smaller, stupider hill of "super straight". why the fuck should we admit defeat over what "straight" means? fight for simply being straight and insisting that trannies are not part of what it means to be straight.
in short, this whole thing is fucking gay. and counterproductive. it helps accomplish the goals of the left.
sorry but this whole "super straight" thing is actually kind of stupid. i get that it's being done to piss off libs by being confrontational, but the stupid irony of it is that it's actually playing right into the left's hands.
we don't need some new label to describe not wanting to fuck a fake woman who has a dick or a big gash wound where a dick used to be. we already have a label for that.
it's just called being straight.
a) it would've pissed off the left MORE, had people just make a point of saying something like "i'm straight and straight men don't fuck chicks with or who ever had dicks".
b) by instead picking a new label, in essence what you are doing is abandoning the label of 'straight' to the left, and thus making it easier for them to get away with spreading the notion that "straight" people can in fact fuck trannies.
c) you should've picked simply the word "straight" as the "hill to die on", not gave it up, not went for some new hill to call your own, some new, much smaller, stupider hill of "super straight". why the fuck should we admit defeat over what "straight" means? fight for simply being straight and insisting that trannies are not part of what it means to be straight.
in short, this whole thing is fucking gay. and counterproductive. it helps accomplish the goals of the left.
simply using the word 'cisgender' is fucking stupid and plays right into the left's hands. i get that you're just trying to be cute here. but we shouldn't play along with their whole strategy of coming up with new bullshit words to describe simply being normal. there's a reason why 'normal person' didn't need a label, it's because normal people are the metric against which abnormal people should be measured. not the other way around. not being a freak doesn't need a special word. and the fact that the word the radical lefty feminists came up with to describe straight people, sounds like 'sissy' is no fucking coincidence either.
sorry because again i can see that you're just being cute here but it's one of my biggest peeves when i see non-freakos actually using the word 'cisgender' unironically or in seriousness (which again you're not doing here, but i think even using it as a joke is wrong. we should just completely ignore their attempts at redefining language imo, or double down on our own, proper use of it)
sorry but this whole "super straight" thing is actually kind of stupid. i get that it's being done to piss off libs by being confrontational, but the stupid irony of it is that it's actually playing right into the left's hands.
we don't need some new label to describe not wanting to fuck a fake woman who has a dick or a big gash wound where a dick used to be. we already have a label for that.
it's just called being straight.
a) it would've pissed off the left MORE, had people just make a point of saying something like "i'm straight and straight men don't fuck chicks with or who ever had dicks".
b) by instead picking a new label, in essence what you are doing is abandoning the label of 'straight' to the left, and thus making it easier for them to get away with spreading the notion that "straight" people can in fact fuck trannies.
c) you should've picked simply the word "straight" as the "hill to die on", not gave it up, not went for some new hill to call your own, some new, much smaller, stupider hill of "super straight". why the fuck should we admit defeat over what "straight" means? fight for simply being straight and insisting that trannies are not part of what it means to be straight.
in short, this whole thing is fucking gay. and counterproductive. it helps accomplish the goals of the left.
sorry but this whole "super straight" thing is actually kind of stupid. i get that it's being done to piss off libs by being confrontational, but the stupid irony of it is that it's actually playing right into the left's hands.
we don't need some new label to describe not wanting to fuck a fake woman who has a dick or a big gash wound where a dick used to be. we already have a label for that.
it's just called being straight.
a) it would've pissed off the left MORE, had people just make a point of saying something like "i'm straight and straight men don't fuck chicks with or who ever had dicks".
b) by instead picking a new label, in essence what you are doing is abandoning the label of 'straight' to the left, and thus making it easier for them to get away with spreading the notion that "straight" people can in fact fuck trannies.
c) you should've picked simply the word "straight" as the "hill to die on", not gave it up, not went for some new hill to call your own, some new, much smaller, stupider hill of "super straight". why the fuck should we admit defeat over what "straight" means? fight for simply being straight and insisting that trannies are not part of what it means to be straight.
in short, this whole thing is fucking gay. and counterproductive. it helps accomplish the goals of the left.
sorry but this whole "super straight" thing is actually kind of stupid. i get that it's being done to piss off libs by being confrontational, but the stupid irony of it is that it's actually playing right into the left's hands.
we don't need some new label to describe not wanting to fuck a fake woman who has a dick or a big gash wound where a dick used to be. we already have a label for that.
it's just called being straight.
a) it would've pissed off the left MORE, had people just make a point of saying something like "i'm straight and straight men don't fuck chicks with or who ever had dicks".
b) by instead picking a new label, in essence what you are doing is abandoning the label of 'straight' to the left, and thus making it easier for them to get away with spreading the notion that "straight" people can in fact fuck trannies.
c) you should've picked simply the word "straight" as the "hill to die on", not gave it up, not went for some new hill to call your own, some new, much smaller, stupider hill of "super straight". why the fuck should we admit defeat over what "straight" means? fight for simply being straight and insisting that trannies are not part of what it means to be straight.
in short, this whole thing is fucking gay. and counterproductive. it helps accomplish the goals of the left.
sorry but this whole "super straight" thing is actually kind of stupid. i get that it's being done to piss off libs by being confrontational, but the stupid irony of it is that it's actually playing right into the left's hands.
we don't need some new label to describe not wanting to fuck a fake woman who has a dick or a big gash wound where a dick used to be. we already have a label for that.
it's just called being straight.
a) it would've pissed off the left MORE, had people just make a point of saying something like "i'm straight and straight men don't fuck chicks with or who ever had dicks".
b) by instead picking a new label, in essence what you are doing is abandoning the label of 'straight' to the left, and thus making it easier for them to get away with spreading the notion that "straight" people can in fact fuck trannies.
c) you should've picked simply the word "straight" as the "hill to die on", not gave it up, not went for some new hill to call your own, some new, much smaller, stupider hill of "super straight". why the fuck should we admit defeat over what "straight" means? fight for simply being straight and insisting that trannies are not part of what it means to be straight.
in short, this whole thing is fucking gay. and counterproductive. it helps accomplish the goals of the left.
sorry but this whole "super straight" thing is actually kind of stupid. i get that it's being done to piss off libs by being confrontational, but the stupid irony of it is that it's actually playing right into the left's hands.
we don't need some new label to describe not wanting to fuck a fake woman who has a dick or a big gash wound where a dick used to be. we already have a label for that.
it's just called being straight.
a) it would've pissed off the left MORE, had people just make a point of saying something like "i'm straight and straight men don't fuck chicks with or who ever had dicks".
b) by instead picking a new label, in essence what you are doing is abandoning the label of 'straight' to the left, and thus making it easier for them to get away with spreading the notion that "straight" people can in fact fuck trannies.
c) you should've picked simply the word "straight" as the "hill to die on", not gave it up, not went for some new hill to call your own, some new, much smaller, stupider hill of "super straight". why the fuck should we admit defeat over what "straight" means? fight for simply being straight and insisting that trannies are not part of what it means to be straight.
in short, this whole thing is fucking gay. and counterproductive. it helps accomplish the goals of the left.
sorry but this whole "super straight" thing is actually kind of stupid. i get that it's being done to piss off libs by being confrontational, but the stupid irony of it is that it's actually playing right into the left's hands.
we don't need some new label to describe not wanting to fuck a fake woman who has a dick or a big gash wound where a dick used to be. we already have a label for that.
it's just called being straight.
a) it would've pissed off the left MORE, had people just make a point of saying something like "i'm straight and straight men don't fuck chicks with or who ever had dicks".
b) by instead picking a new label, in essence what you are doing is abandoning the label of 'straight' to the left, and thus making it easier for them to get away with spreading the notion that "straight" people can in fact fuck trannies.
c) you should've picked simply the word "straight" as the "hill to die on", not gave it up, not went for some new hill to call your own, some new, much smaller, stupider hill of "super straight". why the fuck should we admit defeat over what "straight" means? fight for simply being straight and insisting that trannies are not part of what it means to be straight.
in short, this whole thing is fucking gay. and counterproductive. it helps accomplish the goals of the left.
sorry but this whole "super straight" thing is actually kind of stupid. i get that it's being done to piss off libs by being confrontational, but the stupid irony of it is that it's actually playing right into the left's hands.
we don't need some new label to describe not wanting to fuck a fake woman who has a dick or a big gash wound where a dick used to be. we already have a label for that.
it's just called being straight.
a) it would've pissed off the left MORE, had people just make a point of saying something like "i'm straight and straight men don't fuck chicks with or who ever had dicks".
b) by instead picking a new label, in essence what you are doing is abandoning the label of 'straight' to the left, and thus making it easier for them to get away with spreading the notion that "straight" people can in fact fuck trannies.
c) you should've picked simply the word "straight" as the "hill to die on", not gave it up, not went for some new hill to call your own, some new, much smaller, stupider hill of "super straight". why the fuck should we admit defeat over what "straight" means? fight for simply being straight and insisting that trannies are not part of what it means to be straight.
in short, this whole thing is fucking gay. and counterproductive. it helps accomplish the goals of the left.
look i know this whole super straight thing is the cool meme of the day to brainlessly parrot and go along with, but sorry but this whole "super straight" thing is actually kind of really fucking stupid. i get that it's being done to piss off libs by being confrontational, but the stupid irony of it is that it's actually playing right into the left's hands.
we don't need some new label to describe not wanting to fuck a fake woman who has a dick or a big gash wound where a dick used to be. we already have a label for that.
it's just called being straight.
a) it would've pissed off the left MORE, had people just make a point of saying something like "i'm straight and straight men don't fuck chicks with or who ever had dicks".
b) by instead picking a new label, in essence what you are doing is abandoning the label of 'straight' to the left, and thus making it easier for them to get away with spreading the notion that "straight" people can in fact fuck trannies.
c) you should've picked simply the word "straight" as the "hill to die on", not gave it up, not went for some new hill to call your own, some new, much smaller, stupider hill of "super straight". why the fuck should we admit defeat over what "straight" means? fight for simply being straight and insisting that trannies are not part of what it means to be straight.
in short, this whole thing is fucking gay. and counterproductive. it helps accomplish the goals of the left.
sorry but this whole "super straight" thing is actually kind of stupid. i get that it's being done to piss off libs by being confrontational, but the stupid irony of it is that it's actually playing right into the left's hands.
we don't need some new label to describe not wanting to fuck a fake woman who has a dick or a big gash wound where a dick used to be. we already have a label for that.
it's just called being straight.
a) it would've pissed off the left MORE, had people just make a point of saying something like "i'm straight and straight men don't fuck chicks with or who ever had dicks".
b) by instead picking a new label, in essence what you are doing is abandoning the label of 'straight' to the left, and thus making it easier for them to get away with spreading the notion that "straight" people can in fact fuck trannies.
c) you should've picked simply the word "straight" as the "hill to die on", not gave it up, not went for some new hill to call your own, some new, much smaller, stupider hill of "super straight". why the fuck should we admit defeat over what "straight" means? fight for simply being straight and insisting that trannies are not part of what it means to be straight.
in short, this whole thing is fucking gay. and counterproductive. it helps accomplish the goals of the left.
are you saying that you're gay? or just that you're really stupid
this is all the same shit the new york post reported like a week ago
are you some kind of retarded mutant or something?
enjoy being a retard who can't actually respond to someone's post or any of the content in it and instead has to resort to just calling names like a bitch, making it obvious you lack the intelligence to actually come up with any counter points. posts like yours there are so common, and you low IQ fucks making them should just simply say 'i can't think of anything to say in response so instead i'm gonna call you a doo doo'
the media are firmly in democrats pockets and they're not going to go after cuomo for the nursing home thing, after the spent a fucking whole year praising him over his handling of it, and using him as a metric to compare trump's 'terrible' handling of the virus against. you don't understand much of anything when it comes to the media. if it wasn't for the media barely any democrats would have a chance in hell of being elected. if they actually told the truth, and were fair and even in their reporting, the world would be so radically different it'd be mind blowing. and all that would require is them telling the truth. and yet, here we are in this topsy turvy world where even the 'boldest' republicans can't just call a tranny a man. even trump had to play it somewhat safe and say 'born biologically a male'. that's the fucking world we live in, and it's media lies that allowed it to be this messed up. and you think that there are 'honest journalists' who would go out of their way to 'dig in' to the cuomo nursing home thing? what a joke.
this is the stupidest thing i've ever heard.
so you think: a) the media couldn't just ignore the year old nursing home thing, if they wanted to? like they did with a much bigger scandal: the FBI spying on trump. so they could ignore that one, but not this one? this time they for some reason, NEED something else to talk about, because otherwise they simply couldn't just ignore the nursing home issue like they have countless times in the past with even bigger scandals. ok.
b) the FBI are ever going to conduct a real investigation into a democrat? that their 'investigation' isn't just a cover-up operation? what a fucking joke. where have you been these past several years?
c) that people 'asking questions' somehow has any impact on what the FBI does. again, what a fucking joke. the FBI doesn't need people to stop asking questions. all they need to do is drag their 'investigation' into cuomo out for a year, and then quietly close the case with no indictments.
if 'we the people' had half as much power as you think we do, if all it took was us 'asking questions', then why the fuck did they just get away with stealing an election. jesus christ i can't even believe the stupidity and naivety in this. especially after what just happened with the election.
antifa has leaders. even national and international.
they're just not on paper.
so uh, we can't emulate their model unless we can somehow come up with our own shadow world government, like the left already has.
no, i have been paying attention. i was aware of both of those points. i read the articles about them. the aide talking to democrat state legislators.
it doesn't mean anything. which i know, because i've paid attention to what's going on since long before that 'revelation'. i've noticed over the years how democrats always get away with everything.
so who, exactly, is going to 'lock him up'? the FBI? the FBI?
is it the FBI? get fucking real.
no, it's not any of that.
if we abandon simply calling ourselves "straight" and call ourselves by some new, stupider label from now on, then the left get to completely claim the term "straight" and define it however the want.
which is exactly the fuck what they want to do. and you're helping them do it. now, because of people like you, opting to abandon calling yourselves "straight", giving up on the word straight, and instead calling yourselves by some new label, now the left can, with no opposition, just decree that "straight men can fuck trannies".
and that's exactly what they've been trying to do for years. the super straight meme just helps them win one of their current language goals. the super straight people are in essence saying "ok libs, you can have straight. i don't care about it. i'll just call myself some other stupid fake label."
we should actually fight for something for one. instead of letting them win. we should stand up and insist that words have meaning, and straight men don't fuck trannies.