Do you know of a chemical that's an exact match to this? Lithium and magnesium don't seem to match, and the main thing that comes to mind for "burns, don't add water" is reactive metals.

I checked lithium. It has similar MSDS info for health and instability, but not flammability. A flammability above 2 probably wouldn't be approved for battery usage.

Flammable 4, explosive 3. This would blow up if refrigeration turned off.

Edit: nope, explosive 1. It would just burn. This makes sense with some batteries like Lithium.

Really interesting...

Seems like there's not one deep state as I thought earlier, but a lot of separate deep states fighting for power.

Interesting thing about the letter, but I couldn't see Pence's response, and the TPP didn't include China, and I found this on the wiki page: "Many observers have argued the trade deal would have served a geopolitical purpose, namely to reduce the signatories' dependence on Chinese trade and bring the signatories closer to the United States"

Interesting stuff going on... Hard to make definite heads or tails of it all.

Got a link? I can't seem to search this site.

Absolute power corrupts absolutely.

Nice sounding quote, but quotes are often bs.

Your personality doesn't change the instance you get power. However, people born in power and peace will not know all the problems that come if they use it incorrectly. Also, people may steal or kill for power, then rule from the shadows, and that's high risk high reward, but less risk in peaceful times.

Suspected for what exactly?

Could be a disinformation play, could be pride and derangement, could be controlled opposition. Not sure which one yet.

• Disinformation Play - Cast doubt on Pence so that Democrats won't attack him before the 6th. Make a bunch of noise about the cases to bring the evidence out and show courts as corrupt.
• Pride and Derangement - This is the first time Lin is really in the public eye, so unfortunately he's making his cases overly public, and letting it go to his head
• Controlled Opposition - Lin has been purposefully riling up the base while bringing up lawsuits that are hard to believe from the average person and will be thrown out and hurt Trump's credibility. Then he attacks Pence who could ensure Trump's victory on the 6th.

Anyone high up would only used a bomb to grab attention.

If they needed facilities shut down, they would send people in instead, because a bomb likely wouldn't do the job unless the whole building was destroyed. Data centers can be pretty redundant and secure.

Where's the law for that deadline? I believe it's made up.

Still exists in Congo, Peru, and Madagascar, and can be treated with antibiotics.

Unfortunately they'd get banned instantly.

Maybe if you used accounts that mildly mimicked lefties for a bit, then came out and redpilled at key moments.

...I might want to build those bots if I could get the chance.

It's not supposed to be faint at all, or barely visible. It's supposed to be as pronounced as the line below it. It'd be a pretty terrible test otherwise.

Ah. I don't think the paper tests have been approved by the CDC. It was most likely the PCR tests then, which are more expensive and could be configured to give more False positives.

I believe the paper tests are from here: https://www.rapidtests.org/

I think that guy's more trustworthy than a lot of the "doctors" in the media I've been hearing from.

Which test are they using though? Some are definitely faulty.

They are questioning this test, but not the faulty PCR test. Because this test has fewer false positives.

Including this case shown in the video, which is a negative result.

I agree.

I think this test may be purposefully being debunked in favor of the faulty PCRs. If followed, this test should end the coronavirus pandemic, and there's a lot of money in not doing that.

So it's just an argument from authority?

No it doesn't. Fauci is also a doctor.

Do you have a vid? If there are two lines, that's proof the test isn't working right.

Can't see the test in there. Is there a minute and second mark where both lines would be visible?

There aren't. I watched the video.

This is a case where I could actually see adding extra context about the tweet. Like how to correctly read the test 🤦‍♂️. Looks like someone replied with that though.

Two lines is positive. Not one.

The test came out negative anyway. Two lines means positive on that specific test.

These might be the doctors that would cut off the wrong leg.