1
sacrebleu 1 point ago +1 / -0

What is her definition of "beautiful"? If two sides do not have an agreed definition, exchanging ideas is meaningless.

3
sacrebleu 3 points ago +3 / -0

The dilemma of feminists... They want people to believe that females are just as strong and capable as males, but they also want special protections for females against males in competition.

1
sacrebleu 1 point ago +1 / -0

God, I suspected that it might be a joke, but it was a real article. So, does he think that his penis is now a vagina, because he feels like he is a woman? How does that work? Gynaecologists are those who studied vaginas/wombs and have equipments for examining/treating those organs. What did he expect?

I wonder if he knows that, but just posting these anyway to get attentions, because otherwise he would be a nobody.

3
sacrebleu 3 points ago +3 / -0

I read here that the Biden administration also cancelled the 1776 initiative. That's destroying the Independence Day.

1
sacrebleu 1 point ago +1 / -0

I did not watch the ceremony. I guess Trump should not have been there, but what about Pence? Did he join the ceremony?

79
sacrebleu 79 points ago +79 / -0

"A cause of death has not yet been release for Aaron"

Probably another "COVID-19 death"... By the way, it should have been "released", not "release", right?

1
sacrebleu 1 point ago +1 / -0

And mask is their cross. WHO is like the Vatican.

1
sacrebleu 1 point ago +2 / -1

Eh... Let's be precise. It was a sexual assault. I don't know about the US laws, but where I live, rape is defined as inserting the rapist's genitalia into the woman's genitalia without consent. Biden put his fingers into her. I am not saying that what Biden did was not a crime, but not a rape.

1
sacrebleu 1 point ago +2 / -1

Is it real or a so-called "meme"?

How can one hack something like that. Is it connected to the Internet?

1
sacrebleu 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, that kind of things will happen more and more, and soon the sexual division will be de-facto meaningless, because now that sex(I use it as the same meaning as "gender") is something that one can change on a whim without any further proof.

I think that sexual division was invented on an assumption that women are fundamentally weaker than men, and that that fact cannot be changed in anyway, therefore it is unfair to let women compete with men. Now that that kind of assumption would be a horrible "alt-right" misogyny, what are the rationales for the existence of the division? I would really like to ask feminists....

3
sacrebleu 3 points ago +3 / -0

Why is it a "glass ceiling"? Isn't that used for situations where a woman is equally or more qualified but does not get a job only because she is a woman? In women's supports, women and those men who claim to be women will be competing equally, and if women lose, it will be because of their own inferiority.

Also, abolish sexual divisions in sports, now that we all must agree that women are just as strong as men.

3
sacrebleu 3 points ago +4 / -1

Includes comments from our traitor mod, Jody

"The Daily Dot was unable to reach Jody Williams, whom the Wall Street Journal reports owns thedonald.win, for comment."

So... what comments are you talking about?

1
sacrebleu 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah. I just checked it ( https://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/ ) and it really did have the pronoun drop-down. But it also had a prefix drop-down that included "Mx.". What the heck is Mx, mixter?

Also, what happens if I choose Mr and she/her? All these pronouns would completely lose their meanings, if it is not tied to the actual gender.

1
sacrebleu 1 point ago +1 / -0

And who are these two persons and their relationship?

1
sacrebleu 1 point ago +1 / -0

I can already see the results. SCOTUS: "No standing." Mainstream media: "Debunked." Democrats: "Threat to our democracy." Prove me wrong.

3
sacrebleu 3 points ago +3 / -0

Is it common or accepted in the US to kiss one's own grandchild of the opposite sex on the lips? No one kisses a family member on the lips where I live.

3
sacrebleu 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah, the authors could start the practice by keeping their house doors open 24/7, and not not placing any guarding system there, like a dog or a security camera. Let's see how long it takes until their homes get robbed.

1
sacrebleu 1 point ago +1 / -0

If the OP had not altered the image, they are still do it. The 20th Psaki had 5.8K likes and 31K dislikes in the image above, but when I checked it moments ago ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N4WMxMJ-J3Y ), it had 5.9K likes and 30K dislikes.

Technically, it is possible that 1K people withdrew their dislikes, but Occam's razor says YouTube removed 1K dislikes.

1
sacrebleu 1 point ago +1 / -0

I asked here about a week ago if they can retroactively impeach Trump AFTER Biden became the president, and someone replied no. So, why is Trump hiring a lawyer? Was the person wrong and can the Senate impeach Trump now?

3
sacrebleu 3 points ago +3 / -0

But in that Simpsons episode, Lisa became the PRESIDENT, not VP, right after the "Trump administration". And wearing the same clothe is an easy self-fulfilling prophecy. Probably someone watched that famous clip (because it "predicted" Trump administration) and told Harris about it.

Rather than a prophecy, maybe Harris is implicitly showing her ambition to became the President before the end of Biden's first term? I mean, if she becomes the President after Biden's full term, that episode's prediction becomes wrong.

19
sacrebleu 19 points ago +19 / -0

So, it is not the "embassy" but NEAR the "embassy". Then, it is an internal matter of Iraq. Why should the US send more troops to prevent that? Let the Iraqi people handle their own nation; they are not children.

4
sacrebleu 4 points ago +4 / -0

Of course not, the head seems to have been added by an image editor. The big Chinese letters below is "愛父", which, if read left-to-right, would mean "loving father", and if read right-to-left, "father's love". Traditionally Chinese was written right to left, but I am not sure if they now write it in which direction. My guess is that that statue is some sort of an exemplary father and son.

view more: Next ›