3
sacrebleu 3 points ago +3 / -0

he'd have to pay trillions in damages.

Too bad that it will not be his money but your money that he pays.

1
sacrebleu 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't understand. If women are just as strong as or only better than (as Obama once said) men, why are their sexual divisions in sports, in the first place? Let's abolish the divisions and make all sports unisex. Yeah, let all genders compete equally in one league. Make a movement that requests for this ultimate gender equality!

1
sacrebleu 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't get it. It seems that the td.w's certificate is changed to a self-created certificate (named Vmware or something). What's the purpose of that action? What does he (the owner) gain?

1
sacrebleu 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, mostly. Except for some tiny percentage of birth defects whose chromosomes are abnormal.

2
sacrebleu 2 points ago +2 / -0

What the... Doesn't Joe Biden hate Lincoln? Didn't he say something about Lincoln and Trump during the presidential debate? Also, Lincoln was a Republican.

5
sacrebleu 5 points ago +5 / -0

I think it is "cisgender women" who got angry, not transgenders. Funny how no one on Twitter seems be angry for the same reason but for men's rights. I mean, unless Biden's order applies to only transgender women, not to transgender men, the same accusations should be applied to the rights of "cisgender" men, right?

7
sacrebleu 7 points ago +7 / -0

I checked it, and it really was disabled: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N4WMxMJ-J3Y That's not good for a "press secretary". Her job is to communicate with the public. For that, I clicked "dislike".

0
sacrebleu 0 points ago +1 / -1

Haha, I just tested Google and DDG and it was true. In DDK, just typing "biden pl" shows "Biden plagiarism scandal" at the top.

1
sacrebleu 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think that instead of redirecting TDW to PW, the moderators could just make those two domains point to the same server. That is, whichever domain you type, you see the same contents.

And on the top banner, they could show the addresses with equally big fonts. Over time, users will remember both addresses, and in case the TDW domain owner tries to take away that domain, moderators then can cut the link to that domain from the server and make it accessible only by the PW domain.

1
sacrebleu 1 point ago +1 / -0

I am not a native English speaker, so I am actually asking. Is "Salute the marines." a correct sentence, if he wanted to salute the marines? Shouldn't it have been either "I salute (verb) the marines." or "Salute (noun) to the marines."?

1
sacrebleu 1 point ago +1 / -0

"Fossil fuels for me, but not for thee."

... unless that private jet is solar-powered or electric or something. Then I will sincerely apologise to George, uh George... Joe Biden.

2
sacrebleu 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't see the problem. I think it is very unlikely but even if it were a "takeover", what is the difference? All the data are the same, and I don't see any policy changes like banning rules, etc. As long as I can see/write the same things I want, I don't care who run the site or what the URL is.

If it really turns out to be a "takeover" in the near future, we can just move to another site that the real moderates create.

2
sacrebleu 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't understand the owner of the "donald.win" domain, who left this site "out of fear". Why can't he just transfer the domain to the remaining moderators? If he really feared that some left-wing mob/FBI/CIA would target him for running this site, wouldn't it make him a lot safer not to own the domain?

Is there any good reason for that, other than something like "someday I may be able to sell this domain for a big money" or something?

1
sacrebleu 1 point ago +1 / -0

Is there some sort of independent website that monitors and logs changes of the view/like/dislike counts of YouTube videos, like the site that shows price changes of Amazon products?

1
sacrebleu 1 point ago +1 / -0

same URL

Is that possible? The title could be the same, but I think URL's are decided when you upload videos, and as far as I know, you cannot modify the video itself, only things like the title, description or annotations. Otherwise, a lot of people would have edited their videos instead of reuploading for a mistake they made in that video.

3
sacrebleu 3 points ago +3 / -0

Other things are at least theoretically doable, but what the heck is 9? How could a government do that, unless, they abandon capitalism and adopt communism?

17
sacrebleu 17 points ago +17 / -0

Remember when YouTube had the "video response" feature? Imagine how glorious that would have been, if it still existed today.

9
sacrebleu 9 points ago +9 / -0

It was now even fewer. 2.3K dislikes when I first opened the page (after this post), then 2.6K a few minutes later.

4
sacrebleu 4 points ago +4 / -0

Hey... what are those brown bottles that were still unsold, despite the devastating food shortages? Must something really untasty...

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›