5
sacredheart 5 points ago +5 / -0

This is the demographic that will never ever feel stupid and regret their past actions.

0
sacredheart 0 points ago +1 / -1

Yeah, it's odd why just saying 'I don't care about new wars if you will not support the President' has become such a scary and terrifying statement.

If they don't care about the President, why should we care if they have to go fight in new wars?

Weird that asking such a simple question, even as it supports the President, is just so wrong and bad.

-1
sacredheart -1 points ago +1 / -2

Who is we? You sound exactly like the left now. Why are yoo so reluctant to acknowledge what is blindingly obvious to anyone? The military and Trump are at odds with each other and if the military will not support Trump, we are not obligated to rush to protect them from any new wars being declared.

Why does this frighten you so much?

-1
sacredheart -1 points ago +1 / -2

Why am I the one looking ridiculous when you're the one who has refused to address or refute a single legitimate point I made?

You sound frightened and upset. Your military has changed. Why don't you admit that?

Do you support the President? Or not?

-2
sacredheart -2 points ago +1 / -3

What incitement exactly? What "Boogaloo"

If you're literate and you have reading capacity, you will see that my post says just the opposite about any "incitement" and what not.

There is no incitement. Just the opposite.

And if this military called Trump to right the ship, where the fuck are they now? Where the fuck were they in June?

What happened with Mattis, Kelly, Milley et al?

You are wrong and you don't want to admit that. The military from just 4 years ago is not the same military as it is today. You're a veteran. The current military is not your wheelhouse. You're speaking from a time that is long gone and does not exist any more.

New wars don't have to be our problem any more if the current/active military does nothing to support the President.

6
sacredheart 6 points ago +6 / -0

They're not done with you though. Not even close.

0
sacredheart 0 points ago +1 / -1

It'll be a woman who puts it in your head:

"Minister of Justice and Public Security Monica Maeland declared victory because speech regulation must be “adapted to the practical situations that arise.” The “practical situation” includes speaking to your own spouse or family."

1
sacredheart 1 point ago +2 / -1

Stop shielding women from criticism:

"Minister of Justice and Public Security Monica Maeland declared victory because speech regulation must be “adapted to the practical situations that arise.” The “practical situation” includes speaking to your own spouse or family."