Why are there still cases in the shithole middle eastern countries? Surely the burkas protect them
I'm a resident physician, I was in a required conference and listened to the Dr. That's the head of refugee care. He lasted about 15 minutes before mentioning GEOTUS then he couldn't help himself and started with the "since trump became president the number of refugees is a small percentage of what it used to be" as I'm thinking to myself good. Then he mentions the muslim ban. I'm trying not laugh as he gets triggered about it all. Then he starts talking about the barriers to treating refugees, someone mentions language barrier and he got a little flustered, then he said cultural norms is a big one and how people from this region prefer if you only speak to the eldest male, people from this region get offended if you look directly at them, women from this region wont let you do a physical exam if the husband is not present etc. I raised my hand and asked if they're coming here because their country was so bad, why do we have to conform to their norms? Shouldn't they assimilate? I literally saw him do the NPC eyebrow drop lol he didn't answer and kept going I think I broke him. Pretty sure I'm going to get written up and have to meet with the head honchos. Hope I dont get kicked out, but was worth it lol
"The purpose of a facemask, when worn by a patient suspected or confirmed with an illness such as influenza or tuberculosis, is to reduce the amount of large infectious particles released as the patient talks, sneezes, or coughs; this limits their concentration in the room air and reduces the infection risk to others who are present. However, facemasks by design do not seal tightly to the wearer’s face. Therefore, they allow unfiltered air to easily flow around the sides of the facemask into the breathing zone and respiratory tract of the wearer. In addition, the materials used for facemasks are not regulated for their ability to filter particles and are known to vary greatly between models. This makes it possible for small particles to pass through or around the facemask and be inhaled by the wearer. This is why they are not considered respiratory protection— facemasks do NOT provide the wearer with a reliable level of protection from inhaling smaller particles, including those emitted into the room air by a patient who is exhaling or coughing, or generated during certain medical procedures. The purpose of a respirator when worn by healthcare personnel, for example a N95 filtering facepiece respirator, is typically to protect the wearer by reducing the concentration of infectious particles in the air inhaled by the wearer. These particles may come from infectious patients who are exhaling, talking, sneezing, or coughing in the rooms in which healthcare personnel are working; from medical procedures performed on infectious patients (e.g., using bone saws or performing bronchoscopies); or from laboratory procedures (e.g., operating centrifuges, blenders, or aspiration equipment) that may aerosolize pathogens. Respirators are designed and regulated to provide a known level of protection when used within the context of a comprehensive and effective respiratory protection program (see the “Types of Respiratory Protection” section on page 15). For example, filtering facepiece respirators are designed to seal tightly to the face when the proper model and size is selected for the individual by using a fit test procedure. The wearer can then be assured that inhaled air is forced through the filtering material, which allows contaminants to be captured and reduces exposure to both large droplets and small infectious particles."
https://www.osha.gov/SLTC/respiratoryprotection/index.html
See: NIOSH/OSHA/CDC Toolkit
Edit: direct link to pdf https://www.osha.gov/Publications/OSHA3767.pdf
"The purpose of a facemask, when worn by a patient suspected or confirmed with an illness such as influenza or tuberculosis, is to reduce the amount of large infectious particles released as the patient talks, sneezes, or coughs; this limits their concentration in the room air and reduces the infection risk to others who are present. However, facemasks by design do not seal tightly to the wearer’s face. Therefore, they allow unfiltered air to easily flow around the sides of the facemask into the breathing zone and respiratory tract of the wearer. In addition, the materials used for facemasks are not regulated for their ability to filter particles and are known to vary greatly between models. This makes it possible for small particles to pass through or around the facemask and be inhaled by the wearer. This is why they are not considered respiratory protection— facemasks do NOT provide the wearer with a reliable level of protection from inhaling smaller particles, including those emitted into the room air by a patient who is exhaling or coughing, or generated during certain medical procedures. The purpose of a respirator when worn by healthcare personnel, for example a N95 filtering facepiece respirator, is typically to protect the wearer by reducing the concentration of infectious particles in the air inhaled by the wearer. These particles may come from infectious patients who are exhaling, talking, sneezing, or coughing in the rooms in which healthcare personnel are working; from medical procedures performed on infectious patients (e.g., using bone saws or performing bronchoscopies); or from laboratory procedures (e.g., operating centrifuges, blenders, or aspiration equipment) that may aerosolize pathogens. Respirators are designed and regulated to provide a known level of protection when used within the context of a comprehensive and effective respiratory protection program (see the “Types of Respiratory Protection” section on page 15). For example, filtering facepiece respirators are designed to seal tightly to the face when the proper model and size is selected for the individual by using a fit test procedure. The wearer can then be assured that inhaled air is forced through the filtering material, which allows contaminants to be captured and reduces exposure to both large droplets and small infectious particles."
https://www.osha.gov/SLTC/respiratoryprotection/index.html
See: NIOSH/OSHA/CDC Toolkit
Edit: direct link to pdf https://www.osha.gov/Publications/OSHA3767.pdf
I've had a few dem friends (that have been friends since we were kids - well before they were dem idiots) text me throughout GEOTUS's presidency. The conversations have gone from full on REEEEEE 4 years ago with them questioning every policy and decision expecting an explanation with articles, research etc only to move the goal post when I decimate their arguement to now genuine questions.
Yes, they still pull their old tactics and move the goal post and want evidence but it all started with one friend about 4 months ago who texted me the following: "you're the smartest person I know, I don't understand how you can support trump". I'm a newly graduated doctor, my friend is an aerospace engineer who has worked with one of the black budget programs (I cant say which but rhymes with punk works) that I was a reference for him on. I've been friends with him since idk probably 3rd grade.
But long story short, I think I successfully redpilled him. We have had numerous debates since that time about BLM, racism in America etc hes black and is from England originally. He tried to tell me America isn't a developed nation because of race relations. He seems to forget that although I look super white, I'm also almost half Puerto Rican. Anyhow I pointed out growing antisemitism in France, how Denmark is rated as one of the most racist countries in europe and that the royal family is literally the epitome of white privilege if we are using his playbook. He of course said that articles from harvard and pew research were not sufficient evidence, but I think I broke him. He has been asking pro trump questions since that time.
This is one of so many friends that have acted similarly to me and have since changed their tune. I think the tides are changing, pedes. Hang in there and keep spreading the truth! We will not allow this country to fall
I don't want security cameras, I have guns which is the best security but my wife really wants exterior cameras. I won't buy ring as they're amazon owned, made in china and hacked all the time easily. I don't like having cameras connected to the internet on my property but my wife wants them. Any recommendations of cameras with IR capability? Thanks guys. I know this has nothing to do with GETOUS I just love my fellow pedes and trust them and their opinion.
All cops are racists and are corrupt, also only cops should have guns.
All white people are racist, also black people should get preference for jobs.
Black people are held back and murdered by white people, also black on black violence has no effect on the black community.
The democrats are the party for black people, also if you don't vote blue no matter who - you ain't black