A very, very likely excuse. You either have that impulse or you don't. There's nothing that would make me want to rape someone, kill, yeah sure but not rape... She might have a case to able to sue mainstream media over this. Because their narrative is patently, provably false, which according to this spastic, lead to the attack. I would be suing if I was her.
Well, according to their experts, there's no evidence he died of a heart attack, that issue is pretty much out the window. I'd be arguing the "boy who cried wolf" defense. They didn't believe him, when he was in that position that he couldn't breathe, as he was saying that prior. Then there's the fentanyl and the meth issue, that issue is out for me, comparing how much was in his system to the DUI's. The bad heart is more compelling. It'll be interesting to see the witnesses the defense calls. I'd say, so far it's 60/40 he gets manslaughter. Which considering his charges, is a win in my opinion. But yeah, anyway, as I said, I really don't care either way, but so far I'm okay with manslaughter. I won't be discussing this further, I really don't care, I don't want to be spending more time on this. Have a good one.
I watched the whole 3 hours of testimony, those doctors watched the body cams, medical records, everything. Watch that video I linked for ten seconds, at the time stamp, if you think me thinking that Tempa involved officer should rot in prison, is me hating all cops, I don't know what to tell you...I'm more pro cop than pro criminal, but criminal cops are worse than just criminals in my opinion, not that, that's the argument I'm making in this case. That being said, your argument works both ways, Chauvin didn't have access to his medical records, so assuming he's in peak physical condition is kind of a stupid thing to do, right? Not to mention assuming he's high as balls on drugs, you won't convince me otherwise on that, we all have eyes. I do agree that the 1st degree murder charge is the "lynching", probably 2nd degree, But they're making a solid case for manslaughter, in my opinion. Can you respond to the fentanyl overdose and the heart attack issue though? Cause, we've been told that for months now, I was saying that myself, if you go through my comments long enough, you'll find that. With the SOP issue, yeah, if that's their defense, then so be it, I do take your point, which is why I would find him guilty of a lesser charge. The issue for me, is why didn't he take pressure from his back and neck after he was no threat, and unconscious, and how much of a role that played in his death. And he knew he was unconscious, you also won't convince me otherwise of that, whether he knew he wasn't breathing is more difficult to prove. I think he would have at least suspected that he wasn't. The SOP doesn't say to remain on them when they're unconscious, I'm assuming it doesn't say not to, which is what your argument is. One thing I'm curious about though, is in that testimony the prosecution asked whether there was any evidence of a heart attack, the Doctor said absolutely not. I don't know the answer to this, but is there always going to be evidence of a heart attack? Anyway, this is genuinely in good faith, so I do appreciate that. I'm open to new factoids presented, but if I'm one of those Jurors, I wouldn't be fighting too hard against manslaughter charges.
Because of how long he did it, after he lost consciousness and stopped breathing. Pretty simple. He posed no threat to them at that time. He was handcuffed. It was excessive force in my opinion. Common sense dictates you stop at a certain point. I agree that the Timpa case and this isn't that similar, and that was far worse than this. The look on that CUNT PIG face when he's being put into the ambulance, dead...It's literally second degree murder, obvious lack of concern for human life, yep...If Chauvin gets manslaughter, I'm not going to care, if he doesn't, I won't care either. But I think one thing we have to acknowledge is that the drug overdose, and the heart attack issue, is probably inaccurate. That doctor can't go up there, under oath and say there was no evidence of a heart attack. The toxicologist can't go up there and show a slideshow showing that the vast majority of DUI arrests who have fentanyl in their system was higher than Floyd's. Up until two days ago, I thought he died of a heart attack brought on by a drug overdose...My mind has been changed at this point, if I was one of those Jurors, I would be saying yes to manslaughter, I wouldn't entertain murder 1 and 90 percent no on murder 2. I do take your point about the approved restraint issue, to me that just means someone else is liable also.
You're not watching the trial are you? That whole fentanyl overdose thing, was almost just thrown out, as a defense. The vast majority of people pulled over for a DUI, for the people that have fentanyl in their system, have more of it in their system than Floyd did. The fucking heart attack thing, was bullshit, the Doctor, under oath just stated there was absolutely no evidence of a heart attack.
He was intoxicated, I'm not saying he wasn't. I said that. The prosecution and the last Doctor said something like that. Floyd posed no threat, for at least half the time he was on his back and neck. We were all told that Floyd died of a heart attack, brought on by an overdose. We were all told that he had enough fentanyl in his system to kill your average person several times over. Most people who are pulled over in a DUI with fentanyl in their system, had more of it in their system than Floyd did...I no longer think that was the cause of death, it might and probably was a contributing factor. As I said though, I'm okay with him getting Manslaughter at this point, meaning either way is fine for me. But I would absolutely find him guilty of a lesser charge than that, it was excessive force which I believe either caused or contributed to his death. If you can't admit there's alot of misinformation going on about this, on both sides, and can't change your mind when new information is presented, I don't know what to tell you. Now do Tony Timpa, similar circumstances, except the the cops are laughing half the time. Watch this cop for ten seconds, look at his face dude, after Tony's lifeless, breathless, dead body is being put in to the ambulance, just ten seconds. This was so much worse than what happened with Floyd, they thought it was fucking funny...https://youtu.be/6X4PUwrq8tA?t=974
Guilty of what? Murder 1 and 2, no. So they will riot. Overcharged, almost by design. But, manslaughter, I'm watching this trial, and I'm pretty okay with him getting manslaughter, and definitely lesser charges than that. I think it was excessive use of force, and it contributed to his death. I just finished watching the toxicology expert and the other doctor, convincing testimony. The last bit when they say he wasn't intoxicated at the time of his arrest though, or rather there's no evidence of that, yeah no.
I see this in South Korean variety shows all the time, if it's not sponsored, they will usually censor. Considering China is communist and state owned, everything that is Chinese is sponsored. I'm sure they're doing this to Japanese and Korean brands aswell. China is asshoe though.
I don't think so, I think it's more of just going after everyone who is vocal with their support of Trump. But to your point about future stars, my money is on MTG. I think she's genuine, MAGA and they can't pull shit like this with her. The most they have on her is some Q posts from several years ago. I didn't like she handled that though. She could have doubled down on some things, at least point out that NONE of those claims have been investigated or debunked. Mention Tom Hanks, the people accusing him of child molestation, him not suing them for defamation, and moving to Greece, one of very few countries that has no extradition for child molesters. Isaac Kappy's allegations he made days before his "suicide". The list goes on. None of this has been investigated or debunked.
Okay boomer. I've been looking at your account for awhile by the way, I know what you're doing...Anyway, the reason they're "invisible" is because they don't exist for the most part. If they're not committing serious crimes, which would be in the news, what's the issue exactly? I haven't seen one news story of an asian gang in the US in like 10 - 15 years. But to your point, if it's war, then it's going to be a very short war...
So odysee can livestream now?