lmao didn’t the president of CNN apologize for airing trump’s speeches unfiltered? as if the american people shouldn’t be able to hear exactly what their presidential candidates are saying without it being distorted with heavily biased commentary and misrepresentation.
I remember an article or headline the other day that said something along the lines of “there is no significant evidence of widespread voter fraud” and I thought wow that’s a really deceptive way to phrase that. They’re not denying that there’s no evidence of WIDESPREAD voter fraud and they’re not denying that there’s no SIGNIFICANT evidence of voter fraud. But they put both of the qualifiers in the statement as if to say “yeah there’s no proof that this happens across the country” well yeah no shit it would be darn near impossible to prove it because of the private, confidential nature of voting. But it’s pretty obvious that the radicals who are willing to do anything for their ideology (burn cities, commit politically motivated acts of violence) and are hell bent on destroying the current government and economic system don’t give a shit about the law that says it’s illegal to vote more than once. They are desperate to win because they haven’t won in so long.
And even if it’s a relatively small number of radicals relative to Biden’s entire voting base attempting voter fraud, it’s still enough to swing an election. If 10,000 Antifa vote an average of 100 times each then that’s a million fraudulent votes for Biden. Democrats know this and that’s why they resist election security so fiercely. The idea that voter ID laws are racist because black people have higher rates of poverty and poor people don’t have access to the internet or basic government services has been debunked. If you live in a city you have access to all of these things. The only people who I can think of in this country who would maybe not have internet or access to a nearby DPS or DMV are those in rural impoverished places like Appalachia or in the Alaskan frontier. And those people probably won’t be voting Democrat. So if anything it would lose a small amount of Republican votes (but lose a vast amount of potential fake Democrat votes so that’s why they oppose it so much).
Everyone in India has voter ID. India, a country with a population of over a BILLION people and a very large segment of the population living in poorer circumstances than anybody in the urban US. If India can have universal voter ID, there is no reason that one of the most advanced and wealthy countries in the world should not be able to. The idea that something as important and controversial as the presidential election should be left without security is completely insane. The American people have a right to know who won the election. Because a contested election will mean chaos on an unimaginable scale.
it's probably the glasses beanie and long hair that make him look so different. in some of these photos you can definitely see that it's the same guy. the people in the timcast irl superchat used to call him sexy soy jesus
I seem to recall hearing even before the riots kicked in that the pandemic drove up gun sales as well. People realized how quickly things can devolve into chaos and that Big Daddy Government doesn’t have the ability to protect you from everything. Or even that they can’t rely on the government to protect your rights.
Ultimately personal ownership of firearms are the last line of defense against violent mobs, a tyrannical government, or rogue marauders. Fortunately it wasn’t some kind of apocalyptic plague that destroyed civilization as we know it, but at the very beginning lots of folks started hoarding supplies and preparing for the worst.
his son, a minneapolis council member, publicly declared support of antifa on twitter about two months ago. he claims that the people burning down buildings are not antifa, but actually white supremacist groups.....
There are certain people who don't want the country to be united. They feed on the partisan and social divide between liberal and conservative, urban and rural, white and black, etc. I hate how it makes me sound like some kinda conspiracy theorist but it's true. The mainstream news networks and social media companies are doing their best to highlight protests so that they can stoke the flames as much as possible and paint a picture of a fractured nation.
his skin color is relevant because the rioters and looters who claim to champion oppressed black people have ironically destroyed the livelihood of an innocent black man. sure it would have been just as tragic if the man was white, but the fact that he's black adds a layer of irony and demonstrates that the mob carrying out these horrible acts don't care about justice.
and they can’t fudge our numbers and/or shadowban us anymore