See how Mike Kelly's case is DOCKETED on December 3rd. Doesn't mean that it was heard. Again, I hope, and honestly, expect, that SCOTUS will hear the TX case, but doesn't mean that SCOTUS will.
I'm sorry, but you are incorrect here.
The only thing that was docketed in regards to the PA case was an application for emergency injunction (https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/20a98.html) with the petition for a writ of cert pending. The case was not docketed since it has not been filed yet.
In regards to the Texas case, not only was a motion for an injunction and temporary restraining order added to the docket, the case itself was added to the docket as well.> (https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/22o155.html)
When a case is added to the docket, it will be heard by SCOTUS:
If the Justices decide to accept a case (grant a petition for certiorari), the case is placed on the docket
See how Mike Kelly's case is DOCKETED on December 3rd. Doesn't mean that it was heard. Again, I hope, and honestly, expect, that SCOTUS will hear the TX case, but doesn't mean that SCOTUS will.
I'm sorry, but you are incorrect here.
The only thing that was docketed in regards to the PA case was an application for emergency injunction (https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/20a98.html) with the petition for a write of cert pending. The case was not docketed since it has not been filed yet.
In regards to the Texas case, not only was a motion for an injunction and temporary restraining order added to the docket, the case itself was added to the docket as well.> (https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/22o155.html)
When a case is added to the docket, it will be heard by SCOTUS:
If the Justices decide to accept a case (grant a petition for certiorari), the case is placed on the docket
"Oh maybe if I say the word fag they'll think I'm a Trump supporter!" - Liberal mind
An application for injunction (PA case) does not need oral arguments to be accepted or rejected.
The TX case is a motion for a preliminary injunction along with a motion for complaint. Preliminary means BEFORE the trial so even if that is rejected, arguments will still be heard.
There is more than one way to petition SCOTUS.
Most cases never make it to the docket. Once on the docket, a case can have one of two statuses: Pending or Decided.
Yes, that was an application for injunctive relief. It was docketed, the defendants responded, and SCOTUS denied the application.
The Texas case is different in that it is a MOTION for preliminary injunctive relief as well as a MOTION for leave to file a bill of complaint. They are responded to differently and have different processes. The PA Kelly application was docketed and dealt with, it was not ignored like you are suggesting the Texas case may be.
There is a term for people who attempt to speak authoritatively on topics they know nothing about - that term is "leftist". It may work for you in your liberal circles where everyone around you knows nothing and is pretending to not be as retarded as they are, but on a conservative forum you stick out like a sore thumb.
I shouldn't even be wasting time responding to an obvious troll with a 1 day old account, but for the sake of others that may be reading this and not sure what the correct answer is:
The Supreme Court has its own set of rules. According to these rules, four of the nine Justices must vote to accept a case.
...
If the Justices decide to accept a case (grant a petition for certiorari), the case is placed on the docket.
Yes the PA case was docketed (https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/20a98.html).
I’m just a little confused about this whole process.
It can def get confusing. The PA Kelly case was as an application for an injunction (basically asking the court to do take a specific action) and they wanted SCOTUS to de-certify the PA election results. The application was docketed, the defendants made their response, and the application for injunction was denied.
But the fact the case is in the docket does not mean it’s gonna be heard.
I have no clue where you are getting this information or why you think that. This is a time sensitive case that requires immediate attention if it's going to be heard. They would not add it to the docket just for kicks and then never hear it - that's not something that happens.
Not yet, the next update we will get is on Dec. 10th which is the deadline for a response from defendants.
SCOTUS doesn't start hearing cases until October and they usually close up shop around June. A case sitting on the docket for months is normal, please stop spreading misinformation on a topic you aren't familiar with.
That's exactly what docketed means. If a case goes on the docket, it is added to the SCOTUS calendar that tracks cases they will be hearing.
The Texas case is already docketed and will be heard by SCOTUS. This PA case raises the same issues as the Texas case, except the Texas case goes further by including more states than just PA.
There is no reason for SCOTUS to hear two cases that are about the exact same thing, they chose to hear the one with broader implications (multiple states instead of just PA).
Fuck the vaccine, untested RNA technology for a disease with symptoms that can be confused with the common cold?
Never.
Sorry Trump, can't bring myself to watch that faggot for one more second.
I've been fighting the mask bullshit from day 1, and until there's more of us it will never end.
Because there's nothing to validate this random social media post.
Now that you know it's fake news, you should delete it.
We are few, but we are powerful.
This man has never skipped leg day
If Ted Cruz presents the oral argument and they win the case, he also wins the 2024 presidential election at the same time.
Registered 6 days ago.
The shills couldn't even be bothered to make accounts months ago and start posting normally before trying to subvert 😂
Here's a video that's still up https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=biFgJhuDXzs
Edit: It's down now
Exactly this. I'm all for 110 but this isn't the place for that topic. It's scares the normies too much and will stunt this sites growth.
What is with all these new accounts saying stupid shit nonstop?
Look at the documents in the Kelly docket, there is no case filed. When you file a case with SCOTUS, you can also request preliminary injunction - the TX case filed both their case & their request for injunction relief at the same time.
SCOTUS can reject prelim injunctive relief and still hear the case - they are just declining to take action before hearing the case.
With the Kelly PA case, they applied for emergency prelim injunctive relief which was docketed, but their filing of a petition of writ for cert (the actual case) was pending submission - you can look at the third paragraph here on the document itself - https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/20/20A98/162573/20201203162739451_Final_Emergency%20Application%20for%20Writ%20of%20Injunction.pdf
Just because SCOTUS denied the application for prelim injunctive relief doesn't mean they are declining to hear the case. Once something is docketed, it is reviewed by SCOTUS. Applications for prelim injunctive relief don't require oral arguments to be decided, they can be approved or rejected before oral arguments (hence the term 'preliminary').
The case was docketed, that means it will be heard. PA never had a docketed case, just a docketed request for prelim injunctive relief. It's difficult with all of the fake news flying around, but it will all be cleared up in a few days when people see the TX case moving along.