I get that he needs to say that, but with all due respect, sir -- no.
AZ pede here from Biggs' district. He's not a fierce warrior or an inspiring orator, but he's been one of the most consistent Trump supporters in congress and so should be lauded.
The main issue is that this particular dataset (voting results from precincts of very similar size) is not a valid candidate for BL analysis. Financial data, which will have values over multiple orders of magnitude, is an excellent candidate. But even so, it's not proof. However, it can be a powerful indicator to justify a deeper dive.
Continuing to promote BL for precinct-level data just makes us look dumb and provides clickbait to the left.
Plot twist: it's estrogen.
Jesus H...
Can we just bomb them back to the stone age already and be done with it?
Better hope you never need an organ transplant then.
Oh shit. I’m 100% MAGA from AZ and that’s actually a demotivator. She gave up before the ink on the fake ballots was even dry. She’s no ally.
If memory serves a hospital is intended to run at about 85% full.
If you’re talking about deliberately performing the test incorrectly nationwide to skew the results, this seems like it would require a huge amount of coordination and complicity (unless the testing is highly centralized). It’s not like the election, where a relatively small number of people in specific targeted locations can have a huge impact.
We know the hospitals had a definite financial incentive to treat every patient as COVID.
Plus, if the test is just inherently prone to false positives, then you could simply exploit that fact. Plus then test everybody under the sun multiple times and just report total cases rather than percent positive.
A wouldn’t it be way easier to just report fake test results?
Kidney transplant April 2019. Hope all is well with you. FYI, I'm on Myfortic and Tacrolimus. CMV that came w the organ still won't completely go away, so I'm also on and off Valcyte depending on lab results.
I got the flu early this year as well despite the shot, but it was mild. The tricky and often unanswerable question is how bad would it have been without the shot?
My reading of the report is that among their participants, half got the vaccine and half a placebo.
If 100 people on the placebo ending up testing positive, then only 5 on the vaccine did. I'm assuming infection it was just by luck -- they didn't spray the participants in the face with coof water.
Kidney transplant April 2019.
The meds turn your immune system down, not off. They're not switches, they're dimmers. It's a delicate balance.
The moronic whores not only kept me alive for several years with a machine while waiting for transplant, they also managed to stick another person's kidney, with totally different DNA, inside me and have it actually function without either killing me or having my body try to spit it out.
Seinfeld: I can't believe they could land a man on the moon…and taste my coffee!
100 ballots was a dangerously small sample when looking for such a small shift. We should be thankful it showed enough problems to justify a larger one.
I've not seen any info on how those ballots were actually selected. Proper randomization is obviously essential for sampling statistics to work. But even if they were "properly randomized," actual % of irregular ballots could easily be twice as high.
A lot of them are, to be sure. But there are also some that are just in it for the graft.
I'm from AZ and yes, she's worthless.
Truly Jeb-level energy.
That's preferable. At least she'll wait until the end of the dog's life to euthanize it.
“I have examined the entirety of my cavernous belly button several times, and have found no convincing evidence. Just lint mixed with Cheeto crumbs.”
I just thought they were spelling it like Biden would pronounce it...
Stakes are higher here though, right? I mean, honestly, how different would a Gore administration have been from a Bush one, as far as the deep state was concerned? This one is literally good vs. evil.
Plus, by comparison, that was a very simple case. Interesting times ahead.
Lately I've been seeing him referred to on the left as a "wannabe dictator."
So like "well, he's not a dictator NOW, but he sure would like to be! Just you wait! If he gets re-elected, THEN you're going to see it, FOR SURE! He's just been holding back on the REAL tyranny until he didn't have to face re-election!"
Kinda like how climate change predictions are made.
Can't really blame us though, can you? We've been through the tough talk, stern warnings, threatening letters, "tick tock" routine more times than I care to remember the last four years (is today's hearing w/ Dorsey et al going to play out any differently?)
Everyone here REALLY REALLY wants this time to different, and so far it's looking good. We just can't help hearing that little nagging "oh man, here we go again..." voice in our heads.
What we've got going for us re the election issue is we're hearing it from people other than slimy equivocating RINO DS scum.
Honestly, by now isn't that the very first thing that should pop into a rational cop's head? "This is obviously bullshit."
If there was no fraud, seems to me the Dems would WANT the signatures to be verified just so they could rub Orange Man's nose in it. Wouldn't that be the ultimate BTFO for them? Every TDS sufferer would quickly resemble Randy Marsh after his encounter with ectoplasm.
Jesus Christ.
Maybe we should just ask "pretty please" if they could restore our first amendment, some resemblance of fair elections, and an impartial justice system.
There is no law. This is a knife fight.