To be clear, even the evidence in the Evidence/Counter-evidence forum dedicated to each article will also have their own thread for disputes. So someone can't just come in and say, "I disagree" and get a million upvotes. There will also be the ability to refute the evidence/counter-evidence. Each post will basically be treated like its own article.
I have way more information on my website idea that isn't stated here, just wanted to give an overview.
It's not a "someone do something" thing, necessarily. It's an "Everybody get hyped up, and EVERYBODY do something".
I think they are disappointed in the amount of dooming and quitting, in what seemed like a hyped go-getter website.
I do NOT advocate for violence.
So you oppose our 1776 Revolution, along with our civil war over slavery.
Millions of people don't need someone to lead the charge, they simply need to mobilize. If there were 10 million people descending upon DC, I'm sure your reluctance to "lead the charge" would disappear.
You are trying to make it look like there are only a few people willing to go there to fight them. You're severely underestimating how many people across the country are willing to fight for our freedom.
You mean someone who believes the same things that Hitler purportedly believed, that Jews diluted white people's perfection, their superiority, their god-like status, wouldn't be considered a nazi?
That is literally the significance of his Norse tattoos. He hangs out with nazis, he has norse tattoos signifying an adherence to Norse mythology.
Not something Antifa would do in their private time.
He's not an Antifa/BLM supporter. He literally runs in circles with National Socialists (Nazis). His tattoos are of the Norse Religion, because he believes in Norse Giants. He's a nazi. The fat bearded guy with him, and the other guy that runs around with the fat bearded guy, are all people who run in circles with nazis.
Viking Dude is a neo-nazi. He believes in the Superior Norse Race theory, where white people were superior giants until they mixed with Jews.
People don't always agree with their parents, sometimes it actually makes them act out stronger in opposition. Children of alcoholics sometimes turn into drug counselors. Children of psychos sometimes become prosecutors/investigators. Children of BLM activists are sometimes Trump Supporters.
Well there shouldn't be anything about this website that is "conservative" or "liberal". It's non-partisan, expresses no beliefs itself.
I would actually expect the left to value such an idea, as it would allow all "right wing conspiracy theories" to be "checked" by their fact-checking. They can send entire mobs of people to ridicule and mock, if they so choose.
It's not a "free speech platform", not a chat site or social media site. It's simply a website that allows ALL publishers to participate. CNN can post articles on it, and so too can their counterparts on the right like Next News Network.
It would basically be a compilation of news media, and then a forum to discuss said news media.
Again, it would be like YELP, which allows customers to rate and review restaurants and businesses, except this is geared more toward news media.
Funding, I believe, would be crowdsourced. I expect there to be many donors to such a website. And there could even be a type of subscription fee to be able to post or create editorial accounts.
A bank would be hesitant to give a loan to a Social media website upstart, but not a News Media Yelp/Review website. I suspect it would look promising to investors.