3
shaven_llama 3 points ago +3 / -0

What does that change? Deliberately abuse the shit out of the 1887 Act, let the Dems challenge it and SCOTUS can then rule the law unconstitutional.

1
shaven_llama 1 point ago +1 / -0

SCOTUS would issue an injunction ordering Pence to count the certified electors, no "hearing of evidence" necessary. At this point, Pence could get next-level ballsy and defy the court (that should set up a fun time on the 6th). The PA SoS got away with laughing in Alito's face, so there's precedent there.

1
shaven_llama 1 point ago +2 / -1

Yep, too much evidence of fraud has been made public. Even if Trump were to suddenly decide to concede and try to calm his supporters - it wouldn't work.

1
shaven_llama 1 point ago +2 / -1

Trump’s hands may be tied on this if he needs congressional support on Jan 6.

48
shaven_llama 48 points ago +48 / -0

Just call a session and certify the GOP slate of electors. They’re screwing with you, just stop playing games with them and do the one thing you know they don’t want.

39
shaven_llama 39 points ago +39 / -0

Where’s my $600 man, I’m watching a marathon of Ow my balls and can’t be assed to read a tweet that long.

2
shaven_llama 2 points ago +2 / -0

It starts in Oregon? Whooda thunkit.

1
shaven_llama 1 point ago +1 / -0

What does he gain by waiting until after the 6th? I think he should have done it immediately after the Texas suit was dismissed.

1
shaven_llama 1 point ago +1 / -0

Appointing Powell as a special prosecutor would be pointless if he leaves office. Biden will fire her immediately.

1
shaven_llama 1 point ago +1 / -0

If I had to bet, I'd bet on Dec 23/24. And you're right - by the time we hear about it, it will be over with.

1
shaven_llama 1 point ago +1 / -0

No idea. We'll know soon enough. If he doesn't use it before Jan 6th, he won't.

160
shaven_llama 160 points ago +161 / -1

The police are going to end up with absolutely no allies and they will have only themselves to blame.

1
shaven_llama 1 point ago +1 / -0

These intimidation tactics wouldn't work if law enforcement actually did their job.

1
shaven_llama 1 point ago +1 / -0

Read "The Naked Communist" by Clean Skousen.

Basically, at the root of Marxism is a belief that Humans are simple animals who are 100% a product of their environment. So, if you believe that, then it follows you can change human behavior into whatever you want if you can exert total control over their environment.

They want the population to whole-heartedly embrace communism. Should just take a few generations of misery and the slaughter of millions who can't be "corrected." I guess the USSR just wasn't committed enough.

16
shaven_llama 16 points ago +16 / -0

Hidden amongst the "non-believers" are the number of Dems who believe it was stolen, and are ok with it.

2
shaven_llama 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's what I thought, but I keep seeing posts like this that I can't find anywhere in my layman's reading of the law. I just don't know what to believe anymore.

11
shaven_llama 11 points ago +11 / -0

Arrested by whom and cooperating with whom? No federal agencies are even looking into election fraud.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›